You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@drill.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/03/30 20:36:38 UTC

[GitHub] [drill] cgivre commented on pull request #2508: DRILL-8176: minor issue in previous jackson bom

cgivre commented on pull request #2508:
URL: https://github.com/apache/drill/pull/2508#issuecomment-1083600516


   > @cgivre I'm not really sure what's going on with the travis-ci tests - I reran them a few times but with no luck - my experience with travis over recent years is bad - so I tend to be reluctant to investigate because the issues usually appear to be with travis as opposed to the code
   
   @pjfanning Would you mind rebasing on current master?  I know @vdiravka did some work on the TravisCI and i'm wondering if your PR just doesn't have that incorporated.  In any event, I'm kind of thinking that the Travis CI is something we may want to drop from Drill.  It seems to be really flaky and wasting a lot of people's time. 


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@drill.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org