You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by "Daniel M. Drucker" <dm...@3e.org> on 2004/09/28 04:43:56 UTC
SARE: What is safe for 3.0.0?
A simple question:
Are all the rules on http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm safe for
use with 3.0.0, other than the ones specifically labeled "pre3.0.0" or
"x30"?
Are any of said rules now unneccessary, even if they're safe?
--
Daniel Drucker / dmd@3e.org
Re: SARE: What is safe for 3.0.0?
Posted by Robert Menschel <Ro...@Menschel.net>.
Hello Daniel,
Monday, September 27, 2004, 7:43:56 PM, you wrote:
DMD> A simple question:
DMD> Are all the rules on http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm safe for
DMD> use with 3.0.0, other than the ones specifically labeled "pre3.0.0" or
DMD> "x30"?
DMD> Are any of said rules now unneccessary, even if they're safe?
Define "safe". They work. Some are less safe than others.
And then there's http://www.rulesemporium.com/rules.htm#highrisk ...
On that page, with 3.0, do not use bigevil or sc_top200 -- those are
superceded by SURBL.
On that page, ratware has been obsoleted and will be deleted shortly.
Maybe someone with a little more time on their hands than I have
should update that page with these 3.0.0 recommendations...
Bob Menschel