You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by Andre Fischer <aw...@gmail.com> on 2012/10/10 11:12:37 UTC
Cleaning up ext_sources/
Hi,
I was reminded by posts in another thread that we still have the
category-B tarballs in SVN. I have created bug 121191 [1] for their
removal. Please see that issue for a complete list of files.
I checked that
1. all of the files that are to be removed are present on apache-extras,
2. the main/external_deps.lst file in our current source release has
references to apache-extras for all the files that are to be removed.
If anybody knows a reason not to delete the category-B tarballs from
SVN, please speak up, otherwise I will remove them at the end of the week.
Best regards,
Andre
[1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121191
Re: Cleaning up ext_sources/
Posted by Dave Fisher <da...@comcast.net>.
On Oct 15, 2012, at 8:55 PM, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Andre Fischer
>
> ...
>>> One thing to think about is if we should remove the category A tarballs
>> too.
>>
>> I thought about that, too, and I think we should.
>>
>>> At least when updating boost I decided not to upload it because it's
>>> rather big. Plus I think infra would appreciate us using mirrors for that.
>>
>> As far as I know codespot.com, on which ooo-extras.apache-extras
>> resides, is a Google service. I don't know how much their infra people
>> like the idea.
>>
>
> FWIW, I think the load for source tarballs is much less, and likely
> to be manageable, than the interest for windows binaries.
Certainly this is true. But then this is an open source project.
Regards,
Dave
>
> Pedro.
>
Re: Cleaning up ext_sources/
Posted by Pedro Giffuni <pf...@apache.org>.
----- Original Message -----
> From: Andre Fischer
...
>> One thing to think about is if we should remove the category A tarballs
> too.
>
> I thought about that, too, and I think we should.
>
>> At least when updating boost I decided not to upload it because it's
>> rather big. Plus I think infra would appreciate us using mirrors for that.
>
> As far as I know codespot.com, on which ooo-extras.apache-extras
> resides, is a Google service. I don't know how much their infra people
> like the idea.
>
FWIW, I think the load for source tarballs is much less, and likely
to be manageable, than the interest for windows binaries.
Pedro.
Re: Cleaning up ext_sources/
Posted by Andre Fischer <aw...@gmail.com>.
On 12.10.2012 17:38, Pedro Giffuni wrote:
> Thank you Andre!
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: Andre Fischer <aw...@gmail.com>
>> To: Andre Fischer <aw...@gmail.com>
>> Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 10:25 AM
>> Subject: Re: Cleaning up ext_sources/
>>
>> On 10.10.2012 11:12, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I was reminded by posts in another thread that we still have the category-B
>> tarballs in SVN. I have created bug 121191 [1] for their removal. Please see
>> that issue for a complete list of files.
>>> I checked that
>>> 1. all of the files that are to be removed are present on apache-extras,
>>> 2. the main/external_deps.lst file in our current source release has
>> references to apache-extras for all the files that are to be removed.
>>> If anybody knows a reason not to delete the category-B tarballs from SVN,
>> please speak up, otherwise I will remove them at the end of the week.
>>
>> Done.
>>
> One thing to think about is if we should remove the category A tarballs too.
I thought about that, too, and I think we should.
> At least when updating boost I decided not to upload it because it's
> rather big. Plus I think infra would appreciate us using mirrors for that.
As far as I know codespot.com, on which ooo-extras.apache-extras
resides, is a Google service. I don't know how much their infra people
like the idea.
-Andre
>
> Pedro.
Re: Cleaning up ext_sources/
Posted by Pedro Giffuni <pf...@apache.org>.
Thank you Andre!
----- Original Message -----
> From: Andre Fischer <aw...@gmail.com>
> To: Andre Fischer <aw...@gmail.com>
> Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Friday, October 12, 2012 10:25 AM
> Subject: Re: Cleaning up ext_sources/
>
> On 10.10.2012 11:12, Andre Fischer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was reminded by posts in another thread that we still have the category-B
> tarballs in SVN. I have created bug 121191 [1] for their removal. Please see
> that issue for a complete list of files.
>>
>> I checked that
>> 1. all of the files that are to be removed are present on apache-extras,
>> 2. the main/external_deps.lst file in our current source release has
> references to apache-extras for all the files that are to be removed.
>>
>> If anybody knows a reason not to delete the category-B tarballs from SVN,
> please speak up, otherwise I will remove them at the end of the week.
>
> Done.
>
One thing to think about is if we should remove the category A tarballs too.
At least when updating boost I decided not to upload it because it's
rather big. Plus I think infra would appreciate us using mirrors for that.
Pedro.
Re: Cleaning up ext_sources/
Posted by Andre Fischer <aw...@gmail.com>.
On 10.10.2012 11:12, Andre Fischer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was reminded by posts in another thread that we still have the
> category-B tarballs in SVN. I have created bug 121191 [1] for their
> removal. Please see that issue for a complete list of files.
>
> I checked that
> 1. all of the files that are to be removed are present on apache-extras,
> 2. the main/external_deps.lst file in our current source release has
> references to apache-extras for all the files that are to be removed.
>
> If anybody knows a reason not to delete the category-B tarballs from
> SVN, please speak up, otherwise I will remove them at the end of the
> week.
Done.
-Andre
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121191