You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@jclouds.apache.org by Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> on 2017/01/26 16:33:22 UTC
Removing the Azure classic provider
Hi!
The Azure ARM provider has been around for a while, and now it will
have support for all the compute extensions (security groups and
images). It is the recommended API to use, so I wanted to start a
discussion about removing the old "azurecompute" provider.
It is still in labs, all the recent contributions have gone to the ARM
one, and I don't know if anyone is using the old one, so:
What about deleting the provider and just keeping the ARM one?
Regards,
I.
Re: Removing the Azure classic provider
Posted by Andrea Turli <an...@gmail.com>.
I think it would be good to deprecate it now and keep it for the next
couple of releases and finally remove it.
Andrea
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The Azure ARM provider has been around for a while, and now it will
> have support for all the compute extensions (security groups and
> images). It is the recommended API to use, so I wanted to start a
> discussion about removing the old "azurecompute" provider.
>
> It is still in labs, all the recent contributions have gone to the ARM
> one, and I don't know if anyone is using the old one, so:
>
> What about deleting the provider and just keeping the ARM one?
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> I.
>
Re: Removing the Azure classic provider
Posted by Andrea Turli <an...@gmail.com>.
I think it would be good to deprecate it now and keep it for the next
couple of releases and finally remove it.
Andrea
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 5:33 PM, Ignasi Barrera <na...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The Azure ARM provider has been around for a while, and now it will
> have support for all the compute extensions (security groups and
> images). It is the recommended API to use, so I wanted to start a
> discussion about removing the old "azurecompute" provider.
>
> It is still in labs, all the recent contributions have gone to the ARM
> one, and I don't know if anyone is using the old one, so:
>
> What about deleting the provider and just keeping the ARM one?
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> I.
>