You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues-all@impala.apache.org by "ASF subversion and git services (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/06/27 11:53:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (IMPALA-8341) Data cache for remote reads
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-8341?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16874036#comment-16874036 ]
ASF subversion and git services commented on IMPALA-8341:
---------------------------------------------------------
Commit e29b387ea10739e78075bac8170e45722d4b9940 in impala's branch refs/heads/master from Alex Rodoni
[ https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf?p=impala.git;h=e29b387 ]
IMPALA-8341: [DOCS] Describe the setting for remote data caching
Change-Id: I7dd958e4de109b46eaf906fe93145799af123b3f
Reviewed-on: http://gerrit.cloudera.org:8080/13724
Tested-by: Impala Public Jenkins <im...@cloudera.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Ho <kw...@cloudera.com>
> Data cache for remote reads
> ---------------------------
>
> Key: IMPALA-8341
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IMPALA-8341
> Project: IMPALA
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Backend
> Affects Versions: Impala 3.2.0
> Reporter: Michael Ho
> Assignee: Michael Ho
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: Impala 3.3.0
>
>
> When running in public cloud (e.g. AWS with S3) or in certain private cloud settings (e.g. data stored in object store), the computation and storage are no longer co-located. This breaks the typical pattern in which Impala query fragment instances are scheduled at where the data is located. In this setting, the network bandwidth requirement of both the nics and the top of rack switches will go up quite a lot as the network traffic includes the data fetch in addition to the shuffling exchange traffic of intermediate results.
> To mitigate the pressure on the network, one can build a storage backed cache at the compute nodes to cache the working set. With deterministic scan range scheduling, each compute node should hold non-overlapping partitions of the data set.
> An initial prototype of the cache was posted here: [https://gerrit.cloudera.org/#/c/12683/] but it probably can benefit from a better eviction algorithm (e.g. LRU instead of FIFO) and better locking (e.g. not holding the lock while doing IO).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-all-unsubscribe@impala.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-all-help@impala.apache.org