You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tamaya.apache.org by Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com> on 2016/04/05 21:49:01 UTC
[VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.2-incubating (vote 02)
Hi,
I was running the needed tasks to get the "0.2-incubating" release
of Apache Tamaya out.
The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]) and on [5].
The tag is available at [3].
Please take a look at the artifacts and vote!
Please note:
This vote is a "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1
votes (see [4]).
------------------------------------------------
[ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
released, and why..............
------------------------------------------------
Thanks,
Anatole
[1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1018
[2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1018/org/apache/tamaya/tamaya-distribution/0.2-incubating/tamaya-distribution-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1018/org/apache/tamaya/tamaya-distribution/0.2-incubating/tamaya-distribution-0.2-incubating-distribution-bin.tar.gz
[3] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tamaya.git;a=commit;h=e684d7e3d8ee3185fd872f55dbd5ace125eeb3c5
[4] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
[5] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tamaya/0.2-incubating
--
*Anatole Tresch*
Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead
Glärnischweg 10
CH - 8620 Wetzikon
*Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
*Twitter: @atsticks*
*Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/
<http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>*
*Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79*
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.2-incubating (vote 02)
Posted by Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>.
Thanks, Oliver😊
Am 05.04.2016 23:32 schrieb "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net>:
> +1 from my side and thanks to Anatole for all your hard work
>
> Am 05.04.16 um 21:49 schrieb Anatole Tresch:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I was running the needed tasks to get the "0.2-incubating" release
>> of Apache Tamaya out.
>> The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]) and on [5].
>>
>> The tag is available at [3].
>>
>> Please take a look at the artifacts and vote!
>>
>> Please note:
>> This vote is a "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1
>> votes (see [4]).
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------
>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>> released, and why..............
>> ------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Anatole
>>
>> [1]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1018
>> [2]
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1018/org/apache/tamaya/tamaya-distribution/0.2-incubating/tamaya-distribution-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1018/org/apache/tamaya/tamaya-distribution/0.2-incubating/tamaya-distribution-0.2-incubating-distribution-bin.tar.gz
>> [3]
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tamaya.git;a=commit;h=e684d7e3d8ee3185fd872f55dbd5ace125eeb3c5
>> [4] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
>> [5]
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tamaya/0.2-incubating
>>
>>
>>
> --
> N Oliver B. Fischer
> A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
> P +49 30 44793251
> M +49 178 7903538
> E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
> S oliver.b.fischer
> J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
> X http://xing.to/obf
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.2-incubating (vote 02)
Posted by "Oliver B. Fischer" <o....@swe-blog.net>.
+1 from my side and thanks to Anatole for all your hard work
Am 05.04.16 um 21:49 schrieb Anatole Tresch:
> Hi,
>
> I was running the needed tasks to get the "0.2-incubating" release
> of Apache Tamaya out.
> The artifacts are deployed to Nexus [1] (and [2]) and on [5].
>
> The tag is available at [3].
>
> Please take a look at the artifacts and vote!
>
> Please note:
> This vote is a "majority approval" with a minimum of three +1
> votes (see [4]).
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> released, and why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Anatole
>
> [1] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1018
> [2] https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1018/org/apache/tamaya/tamaya-distribution/0.2-incubating/tamaya-distribution-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetamaya-1018/org/apache/tamaya/tamaya-distribution/0.2-incubating/tamaya-distribution-0.2-incubating-distribution-bin.tar.gz
> [3] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-tamaya.git;a=commit;h=e684d7e3d8ee3185fd872f55dbd5ace125eeb3c5
> [4] http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html#ReleaseVotes
> [5] https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tamaya/0.2-incubating
>
>
--
N Oliver B. Fischer
A Schönhauser Allee 64, 10437 Berlin, Deutschland/Germany
P +49 30 44793251
M +49 178 7903538
E o.b.fischer@swe-blog.net
S oliver.b.fischer
J oliver.b.fischer@jabber.org
X http://xing.to/obf
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.2-incubating (vote 02)
Posted by Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>.
Easy. It just will take some days more... Keeping my head up ;)
2016-04-06 1:33 GMT+02:00 John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>:
> I have to agree with Phil on this. If the source release contains files
> that shouldn't be there, it's a -1. Sorry Anatole :-(
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:10 PM Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > 1) The files are generated as part of the distribution module. The maven
> > GPG plugin calculates the hashes. I will check the sums (they should
> match
> > the ones cheked by nexus)...
> > 2) I have seen the issue with the backup poms. I added an exclusion rule
> to
> > the dist. Background was, that I had issues with the release plugin and
> > checked out, tagged and deployed the release part manually. Obviously the
> > source distribution has taken up these backup files ;(
> > 3) The release guide is somehow work in progress. I would not rebuild
> > anything just to update the release guide. This can be done at any time
> as
> > well and updates on the site using site:deploy...
> >
> > 2016-04-05 23:58 GMT+02:00 P. Ottlinger <po...@apache.org>:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Anataloe thanks for your steady work!
> > >
> > > Am 05.04.2016 um 21:49 schrieb Anatole Tresch:
> > > >
> > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > > [ ] +0
> > > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> > > > released, and why..............
> > > > ------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > > MD5HASHES
> > > While clicking through the artifacts I wasn't able to verify the
> md5sums:
> > >
> > > $ md5sum apache-tamaya-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz
> > > 3d6f68a118d792bd4fbbcbb5af7893bb
> > > apache-tamaya-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz
> > >
> > > $ wget
> > >
> > >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tamaya/0.2-incubating/apache-tamaya-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz.md5
> > >
> > > $ cat apache-tamaya-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz.md5
> > > a6d1ec4ae240f963c6f68e20e8385675
> > >
> > > How were these files generated? Am I doing sth. wrong?
> > > Same goes for the binary artifact.
> > >
> > > SRC-ARTIFACT
> > > When I unpacked above artifact I found multiple
> > > pom.xml.releaseBackup - should we remove theses files or add it to
> > > gitignore?
> > >
> > > RELEASE-DOCS
> > > I assume we should use an example key/password in the documentation on
> > > howto perform a release -
> > > /docs/release-guide.html
> > >
> > >
> > > Most probably this would lead to a -1 if I were a member of the PMC.
> > >
> > > I do really like the documentation - in contrast to other projects it
> > > seems really useful to me.
> > >
> > > Cheers & sorry,
> > > Phil
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Anatole Tresch*
> > Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead
> > Glärnischweg 10
> > CH - 8620 Wetzikon
> >
> > *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
> > *Twitter: @atsticks*
> > *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/
> > <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>*
> >
> > *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79*
> >
>
--
*Anatole Tresch*
Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead
Glärnischweg 10
CH - 8620 Wetzikon
*Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
*Twitter: @atsticks*
*Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/
<http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>*
*Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79*
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.2-incubating (vote 02)
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
I have to agree with Phil on this. If the source release contains files
that shouldn't be there, it's a -1. Sorry Anatole :-(
John
On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 7:10 PM Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 1) The files are generated as part of the distribution module. The maven
> GPG plugin calculates the hashes. I will check the sums (they should match
> the ones cheked by nexus)...
> 2) I have seen the issue with the backup poms. I added an exclusion rule to
> the dist. Background was, that I had issues with the release plugin and
> checked out, tagged and deployed the release part manually. Obviously the
> source distribution has taken up these backup files ;(
> 3) The release guide is somehow work in progress. I would not rebuild
> anything just to update the release guide. This can be done at any time as
> well and updates on the site using site:deploy...
>
> 2016-04-05 23:58 GMT+02:00 P. Ottlinger <po...@apache.org>:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Anataloe thanks for your steady work!
> >
> > Am 05.04.2016 um 21:49 schrieb Anatole Tresch:
> > >
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> > > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> > > released, and why..............
> > > ------------------------------------------------
> >
> > MD5HASHES
> > While clicking through the artifacts I wasn't able to verify the md5sums:
> >
> > $ md5sum apache-tamaya-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz
> > 3d6f68a118d792bd4fbbcbb5af7893bb
> > apache-tamaya-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz
> >
> > $ wget
> >
> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tamaya/0.2-incubating/apache-tamaya-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz.md5
> >
> > $ cat apache-tamaya-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz.md5
> > a6d1ec4ae240f963c6f68e20e8385675
> >
> > How were these files generated? Am I doing sth. wrong?
> > Same goes for the binary artifact.
> >
> > SRC-ARTIFACT
> > When I unpacked above artifact I found multiple
> > pom.xml.releaseBackup - should we remove theses files or add it to
> > gitignore?
> >
> > RELEASE-DOCS
> > I assume we should use an example key/password in the documentation on
> > howto perform a release -
> > /docs/release-guide.html
> >
> >
> > Most probably this would lead to a -1 if I were a member of the PMC.
> >
> > I do really like the documentation - in contrast to other projects it
> > seems really useful to me.
> >
> > Cheers & sorry,
> > Phil
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> *Anatole Tresch*
> Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead
> Glärnischweg 10
> CH - 8620 Wetzikon
>
> *Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
> *Twitter: @atsticks*
> *Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/
> <http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>*
>
> *Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79*
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.2-incubating (vote 02)
Posted by Anatole Tresch <at...@gmail.com>.
1) The files are generated as part of the distribution module. The maven
GPG plugin calculates the hashes. I will check the sums (they should match
the ones cheked by nexus)...
2) I have seen the issue with the backup poms. I added an exclusion rule to
the dist. Background was, that I had issues with the release plugin and
checked out, tagged and deployed the release part manually. Obviously the
source distribution has taken up these backup files ;(
3) The release guide is somehow work in progress. I would not rebuild
anything just to update the release guide. This can be done at any time as
well and updates on the site using site:deploy...
2016-04-05 23:58 GMT+02:00 P. Ottlinger <po...@apache.org>:
> Hi,
>
> Anataloe thanks for your steady work!
>
> Am 05.04.2016 um 21:49 schrieb Anatole Tresch:
> >
> > ------------------------------------------------
> > [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> > released, and why..............
> > ------------------------------------------------
>
> MD5HASHES
> While clicking through the artifacts I wasn't able to verify the md5sums:
>
> $ md5sum apache-tamaya-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz
> 3d6f68a118d792bd4fbbcbb5af7893bb
> apache-tamaya-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz
>
> $ wget
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tamaya/0.2-incubating/apache-tamaya-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz.md5
>
> $ cat apache-tamaya-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz.md5
> a6d1ec4ae240f963c6f68e20e8385675
>
> How were these files generated? Am I doing sth. wrong?
> Same goes for the binary artifact.
>
> SRC-ARTIFACT
> When I unpacked above artifact I found multiple
> pom.xml.releaseBackup - should we remove theses files or add it to
> gitignore?
>
> RELEASE-DOCS
> I assume we should use an example key/password in the documentation on
> howto perform a release -
> /docs/release-guide.html
>
>
> Most probably this would lead to a -1 if I were a member of the PMC.
>
> I do really like the documentation - in contrast to other projects it
> seems really useful to me.
>
> Cheers & sorry,
> Phil
>
>
--
*Anatole Tresch*
Java Engineer & Architect, JSR Spec Lead
Glärnischweg 10
CH - 8620 Wetzikon
*Switzerland, Europe Zurich, GMT+1*
*Twitter: @atsticks*
*Blogs: **http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/
<http://javaremarkables.blogspot.ch/>*
*Google: atsticksMobile +41-76 344 62 79*
Re: [VOTE] Release of Apache Tamaya 0.2-incubating (vote 02)
Posted by "P. Ottlinger" <po...@apache.org>.
Hi,
Anataloe thanks for your steady work!
Am 05.04.2016 um 21:49 schrieb Anatole Tresch:
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
> released, and why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
MD5HASHES
While clicking through the artifacts I wasn't able to verify the md5sums:
$ md5sum apache-tamaya-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz
3d6f68a118d792bd4fbbcbb5af7893bb
apache-tamaya-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz
$ wget
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/tamaya/0.2-incubating/apache-tamaya-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz.md5
$ cat apache-tamaya-0.2-incubating-distribution-src.tar.gz.md5
a6d1ec4ae240f963c6f68e20e8385675
How were these files generated? Am I doing sth. wrong?
Same goes for the binary artifact.
SRC-ARTIFACT
When I unpacked above artifact I found multiple
pom.xml.releaseBackup - should we remove theses files or add it to
gitignore?
RELEASE-DOCS
I assume we should use an example key/password in the documentation on
howto perform a release -
/docs/release-guide.html
Most probably this would lead to a -1 if I were a member of the PMC.
I do really like the documentation - in contrast to other projects it
seems really useful to me.
Cheers & sorry,
Phil