You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "godfrey he (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/05/26 10:26:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (FLINK-17751) proctime defined in ddl can't work
with over window in Table api
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17751?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
godfrey he updated FLINK-17751:
-------------------------------
Priority: Blocker (was: Major)
> proctime defined in ddl can't work with over window in Table api
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: FLINK-17751
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-17751
> Project: Flink
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Table SQL / Planner
> Reporter: godfrey he
> Assignee: godfrey he
> Priority: Blocker
> Fix For: 1.11.0
>
>
> the following test will get {{org.apache.flink.table.api.ValidationException: Ordering must be defined on a time attribute.}}
> {code:scala}
> @Test
> def testProcTimeTableSourceOverWindow(): Unit = {
> val ddl =
> s"""
> |CREATE TABLE procTimeT (
> | id int,
> | val bigint,
> | name varchar(32),
> | proctime as PROCTIME()
> |) WITH (
> | 'connector' = 'projectable-values',
> | 'bounded' = 'false'
> |)
> """.stripMargin
> util.tableEnv.executeSql(ddl)
> val t = util.tableEnv.from("procTimeT")
> .window(Over partitionBy 'id orderBy 'proctime preceding 2.hours as 'w)
> .select('id, 'name, 'val.sum over 'w as 'valSum)
> .filter('valSum > 100)
> util.verifyPlan(t)
> }
> {code}
> The reason is: the type of proctime is {{TIMESTAMP(3) NOT null}}, while {{LegacyTypeInfoDataTypeConverter}} does not handle the mapping between {{Types.LOCAL_DATE_TIME}} and {{DataTypes.TIMESTAMP(3)}} with not null.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)