You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@directory.apache.org by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> on 2010/08/05 10:10:08 UTC
What about cleaning the branches ?
Hi guys,
we have many branches we created in the past 3 years. Maybe it's time to
cleanup some of them ?
Here is the list of all the apacheds branches we have :
1.0/ 2 years
1.0-with-dependencies/ 3 years
ads-replication/ 17 months
apacheds-1.5.6/ 4 months
apacheds-1.5.7/ 4 months
apacheds-cache-experiment/ 11 days
apacheds-codec-merge/ 12 hours
apacheds-dnfactory-experiment/ 42 hours
apacheds-kerberos/ 2 years
apacheds-noentryclone-experiment/ 2 weeks
apacheds-replication/ 14 months
apacheds-subtree-with-dependencies/ 2 weeks
cache-experiment-with-dependencies/ 13 days
cidit/ 6 months
cidit-with-dependencies/ 6 months
codec-merge-with-dependencies/ 12 hours
dnfactory-experiment-with-dependencies/ 6 days
ldif-partition/ 12 months
ldif-partition-with-dependencies/ 16 months
noentryclone-experiment-with-dependencies/ 2 weeks
quartz-integration/ 3 years
trunk-wd-kerberos/ 2 years
trunk-with-dependencies-1.5.6/ 5 months
trunk-with-dependencies-1.5.7/ 4 months
I'm quite sure that half of those branches are dead by now ...
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: What about cleaning the branches ?
Posted by Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>.
On 8/5/10 1:31 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> +1 to removing the branches
>
>
> As a thought it might be nice to put a file in the branches directory
> listing the old branches that were removed at which revision so if need be
> their deletes can be reverted. Don't think this will be the case but it's
> always nice to do this because it's not trivial getting SVN to give u this
> info along with what the branch was created for.
Excellent idea
--
Regards,
Cordialement,
Emmanuel Lécharny
www.iktek.com
Re: What about cleaning the branches ?
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
+1 to removing the branches
As a thought it might be nice to put a file in the branches directory
listing the old branches that were removed at which revision so if need be
their deletes can be reverted. Don't think this will be the case but it's
always nice to do this because it's not trivial getting SVN to give u this
info along with what the branch was created for.
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:44 PM, Kiran Ayyagari <ka...@apache.org> wrote:
> have removed some of these now (which were created by me and no longer in
> use).
> Please let me know if anyone wants to keep any of the remaining
> branches, otherwise
> will remove the (unused) branches in two days.
>
> thanks Emmanuel
>
> Kiran Ayyagari
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> >
> > we have many branches we created in the past 3 years. Maybe it's time to
> > cleanup some of them ?
> >
> > Here is the list of all the apacheds branches we have :
> >
> > 1.0/ 2 years
> > 1.0-with-dependencies/ 3 years
> > ads-replication/ 17 months
> > apacheds-1.5.6/ 4 months
> > apacheds-1.5.7/ 4 months
> > apacheds-cache-experiment/ 11 days
> > apacheds-codec-merge/ 12 hours
> > apacheds-dnfactory-experiment/ 42 hours
> > apacheds-kerberos/ 2 years
> > apacheds-noentryclone-experiment/ 2 weeks
> > apacheds-replication/ 14 months
> > apacheds-subtree-with-dependencies/ 2 weeks
> > cache-experiment-with-dependencies/ 13 days
> > cidit/ 6 months
> > cidit-with-dependencies/ 6 months
> > codec-merge-with-dependencies/ 12 hours
> > dnfactory-experiment-with-dependencies/ 6 days
> > ldif-partition/ 12 months
> > ldif-partition-with-dependencies/ 16 months
> > noentryclone-experiment-with-dependencies/ 2 weeks
> > quartz-integration/ 3 years
> > trunk-wd-kerberos/ 2 years
> > trunk-with-dependencies-1.5.6/ 5 months
> > trunk-with-dependencies-1.5.7/ 4 months
> >
> > I'm quite sure that half of those branches are dead by now ...
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Cordialement,
> > Emmanuel Lécharny
> > www.iktek.com
> >
> >
>
--
Alex Karasulu
My Blog :: http://www.jroller.com/akarasulu/
Apache Directory Server :: http://directory.apache.org
Apache MINA :: http://mina.apache.org
To set up a meeting with me: http://tungle.me/AlexKarasulu
Re: What about cleaning the branches ?
Posted by Kiran Ayyagari <ka...@apache.org>.
have removed some of these now (which were created by me and no longer in use).
Please let me know if anyone wants to keep any of the remaining
branches, otherwise
will remove the (unused) branches in two days.
thanks Emmanuel
Kiran Ayyagari
On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <el...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> we have many branches we created in the past 3 years. Maybe it's time to
> cleanup some of them ?
>
> Here is the list of all the apacheds branches we have :
>
> 1.0/ 2 years
> 1.0-with-dependencies/ 3 years
> ads-replication/ 17 months
> apacheds-1.5.6/ 4 months
> apacheds-1.5.7/ 4 months
> apacheds-cache-experiment/ 11 days
> apacheds-codec-merge/ 12 hours
> apacheds-dnfactory-experiment/ 42 hours
> apacheds-kerberos/ 2 years
> apacheds-noentryclone-experiment/ 2 weeks
> apacheds-replication/ 14 months
> apacheds-subtree-with-dependencies/ 2 weeks
> cache-experiment-with-dependencies/ 13 days
> cidit/ 6 months
> cidit-with-dependencies/ 6 months
> codec-merge-with-dependencies/ 12 hours
> dnfactory-experiment-with-dependencies/ 6 days
> ldif-partition/ 12 months
> ldif-partition-with-dependencies/ 16 months
> noentryclone-experiment-with-dependencies/ 2 weeks
> quartz-integration/ 3 years
> trunk-wd-kerberos/ 2 years
> trunk-with-dependencies-1.5.6/ 5 months
> trunk-with-dependencies-1.5.7/ 4 months
>
> I'm quite sure that half of those branches are dead by now ...
>
> --
> Regards,
> Cordialement,
> Emmanuel Lécharny
> www.iktek.com
>
>
Re: What about cleaning the branches ?
Posted by Felix Knecht <fe...@apache.org>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 08/05/10 10:10, Emmanuel Lecharny wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> we have many branches we created in the past 3 years. Maybe it's time to
> cleanup some of them ?
+1
Thanks, Felix
>
> Here is the list of all the apacheds branches we have :
>
> 1.0/ 2 years
> 1.0-with-dependencies/ 3 years
> ads-replication/ 17 months
> apacheds-1.5.6/ 4 months
> apacheds-1.5.7/ 4 months
> apacheds-cache-experiment/ 11 days
> apacheds-codec-merge/ 12 hours
> apacheds-dnfactory-experiment/ 42 hours
> apacheds-kerberos/ 2 years
> apacheds-noentryclone-experiment/ 2 weeks
> apacheds-replication/ 14 months
> apacheds-subtree-with-dependencies/ 2 weeks
> cache-experiment-with-dependencies/ 13 days
> cidit/ 6 months
> cidit-with-dependencies/ 6 months
> codec-merge-with-dependencies/ 12 hours
> dnfactory-experiment-with-dependencies/ 6 days
> ldif-partition/ 12 months
> ldif-partition-with-dependencies/ 16 months
> noentryclone-experiment-with-dependencies/ 2 weeks
> quartz-integration/ 3 years
> trunk-wd-kerberos/ 2 years
> trunk-with-dependencies-1.5.6/ 5 months
> trunk-with-dependencies-1.5.7/ 4 months
>
> I'm quite sure that half of those branches are dead by now ...
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkxag98ACgkQ2lZVCB08qHEd5QCeKTFwVuVhgXBXJmhKG2hfRFTE
f2oAniCPO1QrTm40+lVc+65fkZnlVM76
=hE1u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----