You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to repository@apache.org by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> on 2006/07/15 06:57:48 UTC
CI systems
Cursory glance suggests we have:
Commons nightly scripts deploying to the m1 snapshot repo. I've
modifed things so they get ignored.
ActiveMQ, Geronimo, Maven and Cocoon all autodeploying to the m2
snapshot repo. I'm not sure if I can filter these with a regex as they
look much the same as somebody doing a snapshot deploy from the
command line (I think). Any ideas?
Any CI's I'm missing?
Hen
Re: CI systems
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
even better we can automate the setting of permissions to avoid user
setup or mistakes
On 7/17/06, Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think they deployed to the wrong spot. Someone went to deploy,
> couldn't because of permissions, and so moved the old one out of the
> way.
>
> We should be reporting bad permissions (775 on directories, 775 on
> maven-metadata.xml*, 755 on everything else is appropriate).
>
> - Brett
>
> On 16/07/06, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > For m1 snapshot:
> >
> > commons-[a-z]*-[0-9]*.jar
> > org.apache.xbean.*SNAPSHOT\.
> >
> > For m2 snapshot:
> >
> > org\/apache\/cocoon\/.*SNAPSHOT\/
> > org\/apache\/xbean\/.*SNAPSHOT\/
> > org\/apache\/tapestry\/.*SNAPSHOT\/
> > org\/apache\/maven\/.*SNAPSHOT\/
> > incubator-activemq\/.*SNAPSHOT\/
> >
> > Hopefully that'll cut noise down a bit so we can note some of the
> > oddities. Such as xbean (Geronimo I believe) having deployed to:
> >
> > org/apache/xbean-crap/ in the m2 snapshot
> > and
> > org.apache.xbean-deleteMe in the m1 snapshot.
> >
> > Hen
> >
> > On 7/15/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > If you have the auto deploy you can exclude the whole subdirectory as
> > > I think nobody will then deploy snapshots manually. You can even set
> > > the permissions so nobody can do it manually.
> > >
> > > On 7/15/06, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Cursory glance suggests we have:
> > > >
> > > > Commons nightly scripts deploying to the m1 snapshot repo. I've
> > > > modifed things so they get ignored.
> > > >
> > > > ActiveMQ, Geronimo, Maven and Cocoon all autodeploying to the m2
> > > > snapshot repo. I'm not sure if I can filter these with a regex as they
> > > > look much the same as somebody doing a snapshot deploy from the
> > > > command line (I think). Any ideas?
> > > >
> > > > Any CI's I'm missing?
> > > >
> > > > Hen
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > > -- The Princess Bride
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> Apache Maven - http://maven.apache.org
> "Better Builds with Maven" book - http://library.mergere.com/
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
Re: CI systems
Posted by Brett Porter <br...@gmail.com>.
I don't think they deployed to the wrong spot. Someone went to deploy,
couldn't because of permissions, and so moved the old one out of the
way.
We should be reporting bad permissions (775 on directories, 775 on
maven-metadata.xml*, 755 on everything else is appropriate).
- Brett
On 16/07/06, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> For m1 snapshot:
>
> commons-[a-z]*-[0-9]*.jar
> org.apache.xbean.*SNAPSHOT\.
>
> For m2 snapshot:
>
> org\/apache\/cocoon\/.*SNAPSHOT\/
> org\/apache\/xbean\/.*SNAPSHOT\/
> org\/apache\/tapestry\/.*SNAPSHOT\/
> org\/apache\/maven\/.*SNAPSHOT\/
> incubator-activemq\/.*SNAPSHOT\/
>
> Hopefully that'll cut noise down a bit so we can note some of the
> oddities. Such as xbean (Geronimo I believe) having deployed to:
>
> org/apache/xbean-crap/ in the m2 snapshot
> and
> org.apache.xbean-deleteMe in the m1 snapshot.
>
> Hen
>
> On 7/15/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> > If you have the auto deploy you can exclude the whole subdirectory as
> > I think nobody will then deploy snapshots manually. You can even set
> > the permissions so nobody can do it manually.
> >
> > On 7/15/06, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Cursory glance suggests we have:
> > >
> > > Commons nightly scripts deploying to the m1 snapshot repo. I've
> > > modifed things so they get ignored.
> > >
> > > ActiveMQ, Geronimo, Maven and Cocoon all autodeploying to the m2
> > > snapshot repo. I'm not sure if I can filter these with a regex as they
> > > look much the same as somebody doing a snapshot deploy from the
> > > command line (I think). Any ideas?
> > >
> > > Any CI's I'm missing?
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> > No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> > -- The Princess Bride
> >
>
--
Apache Maven - http://maven.apache.org
"Better Builds with Maven" book - http://library.mergere.com/
Re: CI systems
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
For m1 snapshot:
commons-[a-z]*-[0-9]*.jar
org.apache.xbean.*SNAPSHOT\.
For m2 snapshot:
org\/apache\/cocoon\/.*SNAPSHOT\/
org\/apache\/xbean\/.*SNAPSHOT\/
org\/apache\/tapestry\/.*SNAPSHOT\/
org\/apache\/maven\/.*SNAPSHOT\/
incubator-activemq\/.*SNAPSHOT\/
Hopefully that'll cut noise down a bit so we can note some of the
oddities. Such as xbean (Geronimo I believe) having deployed to:
org/apache/xbean-crap/ in the m2 snapshot
and
org.apache.xbean-deleteMe in the m1 snapshot.
Hen
On 7/15/06, Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org> wrote:
> If you have the auto deploy you can exclude the whole subdirectory as
> I think nobody will then deploy snapshots manually. You can even set
> the permissions so nobody can do it manually.
>
> On 7/15/06, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Cursory glance suggests we have:
> >
> > Commons nightly scripts deploying to the m1 snapshot repo. I've
> > modifed things so they get ignored.
> >
> > ActiveMQ, Geronimo, Maven and Cocoon all autodeploying to the m2
> > snapshot repo. I'm not sure if I can filter these with a regex as they
> > look much the same as somebody doing a snapshot deploy from the
> > command line (I think). Any ideas?
> >
> > Any CI's I'm missing?
> >
> > Hen
> >
>
>
> --
> I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
> No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
> -- The Princess Bride
>
Re: CI systems
Posted by Carlos Sanchez <ca...@apache.org>.
If you have the auto deploy you can exclude the whole subdirectory as
I think nobody will then deploy snapshots manually. You can even set
the permissions so nobody can do it manually.
On 7/15/06, Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Cursory glance suggests we have:
>
> Commons nightly scripts deploying to the m1 snapshot repo. I've
> modifed things so they get ignored.
>
> ActiveMQ, Geronimo, Maven and Cocoon all autodeploying to the m2
> snapshot repo. I'm not sure if I can filter these with a regex as they
> look much the same as somebody doing a snapshot deploy from the
> command line (I think). Any ideas?
>
> Any CI's I'm missing?
>
> Hen
>
--
I could give you my word as a Spaniard.
No good. I've known too many Spaniards.
-- The Princess Bride
Re: CI systems
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@apache.org>.
got it. Thanks
geir
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Sorry, brain wasn't in gear.
>
> Run-up is to improve the signal to noise ratio for the repository
> emails. Current signal to noise is good for the ibiblio rsync
> repositories, but the snapshot repositories are very noisy due to
> nightly/incremental/on-demand builds from the ones below.
>
> I'll try Carlos' suggestion of putting ignores on the groupIds that
> appear to be doing automated builds.
>
> Hen
>
> On 7/15/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I missed the run up to this - what's the goal? Excluding auto-generated
>> stuff?
>>
>> geir
>>
>>
>> Henri Yandell wrote:
>> > Cursory glance suggests we have:
>> >
>> > Commons nightly scripts deploying to the m1 snapshot repo. I've
>> > modifed things so they get ignored.
>> >
>> > ActiveMQ, Geronimo, Maven and Cocoon all autodeploying to the m2
>> > snapshot repo. I'm not sure if I can filter these with a regex as they
>> > look much the same as somebody doing a snapshot deploy from the
>> > command line (I think). Any ideas?
>> >
>> > Any CI's I'm missing?
>> >
>> > Hen
>> >
>> >
>>
>
>
Re: CI systems
Posted by Henri Yandell <fl...@gmail.com>.
Sorry, brain wasn't in gear.
Run-up is to improve the signal to noise ratio for the repository
emails. Current signal to noise is good for the ibiblio rsync
repositories, but the snapshot repositories are very noisy due to
nightly/incremental/on-demand builds from the ones below.
I'll try Carlos' suggestion of putting ignores on the groupIds that
appear to be doing automated builds.
Hen
On 7/15/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@apache.org> wrote:
> I missed the run up to this - what's the goal? Excluding auto-generated
> stuff?
>
> geir
>
>
> Henri Yandell wrote:
> > Cursory glance suggests we have:
> >
> > Commons nightly scripts deploying to the m1 snapshot repo. I've
> > modifed things so they get ignored.
> >
> > ActiveMQ, Geronimo, Maven and Cocoon all autodeploying to the m2
> > snapshot repo. I'm not sure if I can filter these with a regex as they
> > look much the same as somebody doing a snapshot deploy from the
> > command line (I think). Any ideas?
> >
> > Any CI's I'm missing?
> >
> > Hen
> >
> >
>
Re: CI systems
Posted by Geir Magnusson Jr <ge...@apache.org>.
I missed the run up to this - what's the goal? Excluding auto-generated
stuff?
geir
Henri Yandell wrote:
> Cursory glance suggests we have:
>
> Commons nightly scripts deploying to the m1 snapshot repo. I've
> modifed things so they get ignored.
>
> ActiveMQ, Geronimo, Maven and Cocoon all autodeploying to the m2
> snapshot repo. I'm not sure if I can filter these with a regex as they
> look much the same as somebody doing a snapshot deploy from the
> command line (I think). Any ideas?
>
> Any CI's I'm missing?
>
> Hen
>
>