You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bigtop.apache.org by "jay vyas (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/03/27 16:59:16 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (BIGTOP-1261) Smoke tests for the NameNode High Avaibility

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13949474#comment-13949474 ] 

jay vyas edited comment on BIGTOP-1261 at 3/27/14 3:57 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------

good idea, but like you said these would be quite hard to verify that they work without a bigtop supported way to setup an HA cluster.

Is there a way to setup  support HA in the puppet recipes.?


was (Author: jayunit100):
+1 but like you said these would be quite hard to verify that they work without a bigtop supported way to setup an HA cluster.

Is there a way to setup  support HA in the puppet recipes.?

> Smoke tests for the NameNode High Avaibility
> --------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BIGTOP-1261
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1261
>             Project: Bigtop
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Tests
>            Reporter: Adam Kawa
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 0.8.0
>
>
> If it is not considered to risky, it might be useful to prepare smoke tests for testing NameNode High Availability. We use such tests a little in my company (we have already implemented smoke tests that we can happily contribute to)
> We test whether
> * Two NameNodes are running and one is in active state and one is in standby state
> * We can do run a failover command successtully ($  haadmin ­failover <toBe­Standby> <to­Be­Active­>)
> * Whether we can transition the active NN into standby state, and move back to the active state.
>  



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)