You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bigtop.apache.org by "jay vyas (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/03/27 16:59:16 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (BIGTOP-1261) Smoke tests for the NameNode
High Avaibility
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1261?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13949474#comment-13949474 ]
jay vyas edited comment on BIGTOP-1261 at 3/27/14 3:57 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------
good idea, but like you said these would be quite hard to verify that they work without a bigtop supported way to setup an HA cluster.
Is there a way to setup support HA in the puppet recipes.?
was (Author: jayunit100):
+1 but like you said these would be quite hard to verify that they work without a bigtop supported way to setup an HA cluster.
Is there a way to setup support HA in the puppet recipes.?
> Smoke tests for the NameNode High Avaibility
> --------------------------------------------
>
> Key: BIGTOP-1261
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BIGTOP-1261
> Project: Bigtop
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: Tests
> Reporter: Adam Kawa
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 0.8.0
>
>
> If it is not considered to risky, it might be useful to prepare smoke tests for testing NameNode High Availability. We use such tests a little in my company (we have already implemented smoke tests that we can happily contribute to)
> We test whether
> * Two NameNodes are running and one is in active state and one is in standby state
> * We can do run a failover command successtully ($ haadmin failover <toBeStandby> <toBeActive>)
> * Whether we can transition the active NN into standby state, and move back to the active state.
>
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)