You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Rodent of Unusual Size <co...@decus.org> on 1997/06/30 00:18:18 UTC
CVS, SSH, and Apache.Org
I continue to have a perfectly awful time getting CVS commands
through to Taz. I don't know if it's the packet-dropper (can't that
be disabled now, Brian?) or the volume of traffic from Dean's
commits <g>, but I have to repeat operations for *hours* before one
will go through.
If this isn't the packet-dropper - or even if it is - will the
pserver interface work better than the SSH setup I'm currently
using?
#ken :-(}
Re: CVS, SSH, and Apache.Org
Posted by Dean Gaudet <dg...@arctic.org>.
Nope I haven't had troubles... but I suspect that I can lock out other
folks quite easily... I'm working with Ken to figure out what's up with
his setup.
Dean
On Mon, 30 Jun 1997, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> At 06:18 PM 6/29/97 -0400, you wrote:
> > I continue to have a perfectly awful time getting CVS commands
> > through to Taz. I don't know if it's the packet-dropper (can't that
> > be disabled now, Brian?) or the volume of traffic from Dean's
> > commits <g>, but I have to repeat operations for *hours* before one
> > will go through.
>
> Hmm, during the weekend the traffic is lower, so the packet loss should be
> less - yesterday afternoon is was down to around 1%, at least during the
> windows I was trying it. If it doesn't get better next week when bandwidth
> through Wired becomes accessible there's not much more I can do. Dean,
> Mark, did you have trouble this weekend with your commits?
>
> > If this isn't the packet-dropper - or even if it is - will the
> > pserver interface work better than the SSH setup I'm currently
> > using?
>
> I don't know how much more efficient it might be.
>
> Brian
>
>
> --=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
> "Why not?" - TL brian@organic.com - hyperreal.org - apache.org
>
Re: CVS, SSH, and Apache.Org
Posted by Marc Slemko <ma...@worldgate.com>.
On Mon, 30 Jun 1997, Brian Behlendorf wrote:
> At 06:18 PM 6/29/97 -0400, you wrote:
> > I continue to have a perfectly awful time getting CVS commands
> > through to Taz. I don't know if it's the packet-dropper (can't that
> > be disabled now, Brian?) or the volume of traffic from Dean's
> > commits <g>, but I have to repeat operations for *hours* before one
> > will go through.
>
> Hmm, during the weekend the traffic is lower, so the packet loss should be
> less - yesterday afternoon is was down to around 1%, at least during the
> windows I was trying it. If it doesn't get better next week when bandwidth
> through Wired becomes accessible there's not much more I can do. Dean,
> Mark, did you have trouble this weekend with your commits?
Nope, none. I am using compression (default level 6) and idea keys. If
you are using keys that take more bandwidth you may have more issues.
pserver may be a touch better because its authentication really sucks and
I'm not even considering network sniffing, since that is by far the least
of your worries. Believe me, you don't want to use it if you don't have
to. It even stores your password in an unencrypted form on your local
drive.
Re: CVS, SSH, and Apache.Org
Posted by Brian Behlendorf <br...@organic.com>.
At 06:18 PM 6/29/97 -0400, you wrote:
> I continue to have a perfectly awful time getting CVS commands
> through to Taz. I don't know if it's the packet-dropper (can't that
> be disabled now, Brian?) or the volume of traffic from Dean's
> commits <g>, but I have to repeat operations for *hours* before one
> will go through.
Hmm, during the weekend the traffic is lower, so the packet loss should be
less - yesterday afternoon is was down to around 1%, at least during the
windows I was trying it. If it doesn't get better next week when bandwidth
through Wired becomes accessible there's not much more I can do. Dean,
Mark, did you have trouble this weekend with your commits?
> If this isn't the packet-dropper - or even if it is - will the
> pserver interface work better than the SSH setup I'm currently
> using?
I don't know how much more efficient it might be.
Brian
--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
"Why not?" - TL brian@organic.com - hyperreal.org - apache.org