You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@ant.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2019/10/10 07:22:36 UTC
[Bug 63827] New: LegacyXmlResultFormatter of JUnitLauncher Task does
not write StackTrace of failure
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827
Bug ID: 63827
Summary: LegacyXmlResultFormatter of JUnitLauncher Task does
not write StackTrace of failure
Product: Ant
Version: 1.10.7
Hardware: PC
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: Optional Tasks
Assignee: notifications@ant.apache.org
Reporter: mseele@guh-software.de
Target Milestone: ---
Switching from JUnit 4 to JUnit 5 we detected that LegacyXmlResultFormatter
does not write the StackTrace of a failure into the xml. Only the message is
stored.
Which makes troubleshooting very hard on failed tests.
Please see JUnit 5 code here:
https://github.com/apache/ant/blob/26b8a01e6421d22a2ca4393ab1420444b07a0bfd/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junitlauncher/LegacyXmlResultFormatter.java#L279
This is how the JUnit 4 code does it:
https://github.com/apache/ant/blob/3a4980e3c4be56745964442abc01360b618e3a85/src/main/org/apache/tools/ant/taskdefs/optional/junit/XMLJUnitResultFormatter.java#L316
final String strace = JUnitTestRunner.getFilteredTrace(t);
final Text trace = doc.createTextNode(strace);
nested.appendChild(trace);
These tree lines are missing in LegacyXmlResultFormatter for JUnit5.
I can add a patch for this if desired!?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 63827] LegacyXmlResultFormatter of JUnitLauncher Task does not
write StackTrace of failure
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827
--- Comment #3 from mseele@guh-software.de ---
Great :)
Just one question, why using "cause.get()" when "t" is already a final variable
(of "cause.get()")?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 63827] LegacyXmlResultFormatter of JUnitLauncher Task does not
write StackTrace of failure
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827
--- Comment #1 from mseele@guh-software.de ---
Created attachment 36816
--> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36816&action=edit
Patch which adds Stacktrace to failures & abortions (without filtering the
stacktrace)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 63827] LegacyXmlResultFormatter of JUnitLauncher Task does not
write StackTrace of failure
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827
Jaikiran Pai <ja...@apache.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|--- |1.10.8
OS| |All
--- Comment #2 from Jaikiran Pai <ja...@apache.org> ---
Hello mseele, I actually pushed a commit a few minutes before I saw you upload
this patch. I see that I missed the "aborted" section. I have now pushed
another commit to fix that too. Thank you for reporting this issue as well as
taking time to create a patch.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 63827] LegacyXmlResultFormatter of JUnitLauncher Task does not
write StackTrace of failure
Posted by bu...@apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63827
--- Comment #4 from Jaikiran Pai <ja...@apache.org> ---
> Just one question, why using "cause.get()" when "t" is already a final variable (of "cause.get()")?
Because working on too many unrelated things and not focusing enough for a
"simple fix" :) You are right though, we can just use "t" there. I'll probably
get to it later.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.