You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@subversion.apache.org by "Wadsworth, Eric (Contractor)" <WA...@fhu.disa.mil> on 2004/10/04 18:15:19 UTC
RE: Moving to 1.1 (FSFS or not FSFS?)
Is there any reason to use BDB instead of FSFS? In other words, what
disadvantages are there to FSFS (the changes specified the advantage of no
wedged repositories).
****
**** --- Eric Wadsworth, 520-533-2749
****
-----Original Message-----
From: Amir Kolsky [mailto:amir@xpandsoft.com]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 6:45 AM
To: users@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Moving to 1.1
Hi...
We have a 1.05 SVN we've been working with for three months now (with only a
single crash)...
We want to move to 1.1. What is the recommended procedure?
What is the procedure if we want to use FSFS?
Amir Kolsky
XP& Software
Re: Moving to 1.1 (FSFS or not FSFS?)
Posted by Jani Averbach <ja...@jaa.iki.fi>.
On 2004-10-04 11:15-0700, Wadsworth, Eric (Contractor) wrote:
> Is there any reason to use BDB instead of FSFS? In other words, what
> disadvantages are there to FSFS (the changes specified the advantage of no
> wedged repositories).
http://web.mit.edu/ghudson/info/fsfs
BR, Jani
--
Jani Averbach
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@subversion.tigris.org