You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@activemq.apache.org by Brian McCallister <br...@apache.org> on 2007/02/01 01:39:03 UTC
Website Up!
http://activemq.apache.org/ is live :-)
No we need to remove the "Incubator" stuff from it :-)
-Brian
Re: Website Up!
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
YAY! Thanks!
On 2/1/07, Brian McCallister <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> http://activemq.apache.org/ is live :-)
>
> No we need to remove the "Incubator" stuff from it :-)
>
> -Brian
>
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Website Up!
Posted by Brian McCallister <br...@skife.org>.
On Feb 1, 2007, at 7:53 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> Did you set up / modify ant cron job to update the site ?
> We need to replace them with a rsync from
> http://cwiki.apache.org/ACTIVEMQ/
> as desribed at
> http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/
Nope, I have not set up any automated refresh.
-Brian
>
> On 2/1/07, Brian McCallister <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>> http://activemq.apache.org/ is live :-)
>>
>> No we need to remove the "Incubator" stuff from it :-)
>>
>> -Brian
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: Website Up!
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Did you set up / modify ant cron job to update the site ?
We need to replace them with a rsync from
http://cwiki.apache.org/ACTIVEMQ/
as desribed at
http://cwiki.apache.org/CWIKI/
On 2/1/07, Brian McCallister <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> http://activemq.apache.org/ is live :-)
>
> No we need to remove the "Incubator" stuff from it :-)
>
> -Brian
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: Website Up!
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 2/5/07, Dan.Connelly <Da...@state.vt.us> wrote:
>
> Links are broken.
>
> 1) header bar "JavaDoc" href
> 2) http://activemq.apache.org/javadocs.html
Thanks Dan. I've just got those fixed now (it took a while to test as
there's a 1-2 hour lag between changing stuff and the apache caching
stuff reflecting the change)
AFAIK all the images and javadoc links now work - though please let us
know if there's anything else we've missed
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Website Up!
Posted by "Dan.Connelly" <Da...@state.vt.us>.
Links are broken.
1) header bar "JavaDoc" href
2) http://activemq.apache.org/javadocs.html
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Website-Up%21-tf3152341.html#a8811041
Sent from the ActiveMQ - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: Website Up!
Posted by Rob Davies <ra...@gmail.com>.
yay!
On 1 Feb 2007, at 23:12, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
> The web site is now an rsync from the cwiki ACTIVEMQ space.
> It is updated daily with a rsync + svn up.
>
> ... and I have removed the incubator logo ;-)
>
> On 2/1/07, Brian McCallister <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>> http://activemq.apache.org/ is live :-)
>>
>> No we need to remove the "Incubator" stuff from it :-)
>>
>> -Brian
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: Website Up!
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 2/5/07, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> What I have set up for servicemix is exactly that.
> The location for the site deployment contains the
> version number, so that you keep all versions.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/dist/servicemix-3.1-incubating/site/
> http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/dist/servicemix-3.0-incubating/site/
>
> So I actually only launch the "mvn site:deploy" to deploy
> all the maven site to its own location.
> Is that what you meant ?
Perfect! :)
(note to self, always check ServiceMix's pom before rambling about
Maven stuff... :)
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Website Up!
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
What I have set up for servicemix is exactly that.
The location for the site deployment contains the
version number, so that you keep all versions.
http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/dist/servicemix-3.1-incubating/site/
http://incubator.apache.org/servicemix/dist/servicemix-3.0-incubating/site/
So I actually only launch the "mvn site:deploy" to deploy
all the maven site to its own location.
Is that what you meant ?
On 2/5/07, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/3/07, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > mvn site:site sit:deploy
> >
> > It works :-)
>
> :) Thanks.
>
> I was wondering if we could somehow get that automatically run as part
> of the release deployment - plus - could we include the version number
> in the location of where the site goes. i.e. so we can have trunk plus
> the last few releases' javadoc online.
>
> Maybe a simpler approach could be that we just do a 'mvn site:deploy'
> whenever we are doing a release - so that the online javadoc matches
> up with the last release. (We can then copy it to some other location
> manually whenever we do a major release if we wanna keep the old
> javadoc around).
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: Website Up!
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 2/3/07, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> mvn site:site sit:deploy
>
> It works :-)
:) Thanks.
I was wondering if we could somehow get that automatically run as part
of the release deployment - plus - could we include the version number
in the location of where the site goes. i.e. so we can have trunk plus
the last few releases' javadoc online.
Maybe a simpler approach could be that we just do a 'mvn site:deploy'
whenever we are doing a release - so that the online javadoc matches
up with the last release. (We can then copy it to some other location
manually whenever we do a major release if we wanna keep the old
javadoc around).
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Website Up!
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
mvn site:site sit:deploy
It works :-)
On 2/3/07, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agreed. I wonder if maven can deploy javadoc as part of a release?
>
> On 2/3/07, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> > I actually think that we should setup the site so that we keep java
> > doc up for all releases previously done.
> >
> > On 2/2/07, Brian McCallister <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Speaking of the site, what are the chances we can keep the javadoc
> > > link pointing to the current release instead of trunk?
> > >
> > > -Brian
> > >
> > > On Feb 2, 2007, at 6:31 AM, James Strachan wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 2/2/07, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> Actually, the cron is set up to run hourly and not daily,
> > > >> so the changes are already active ...
> > > >
> > > > Ah great thanks - thats good to know :)
> > > >
> > > >> It looks good ...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks :)
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > James
> > > > -------
> > > > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> > Hiram
> >
> > Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
> >
>
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: Website Up!
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
Agreed. I wonder if maven can deploy javadoc as part of a release?
On 2/3/07, Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com> wrote:
> I actually think that we should setup the site so that we keep java
> doc up for all releases previously done.
>
> On 2/2/07, Brian McCallister <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Speaking of the site, what are the chances we can keep the javadoc
> > link pointing to the current release instead of trunk?
> >
> > -Brian
> >
> > On Feb 2, 2007, at 6:31 AM, James Strachan wrote:
> >
> > > On 2/2/07, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Actually, the cron is set up to run hourly and not daily,
> > >> so the changes are already active ...
> > >
> > > Ah great thanks - thats good to know :)
> > >
> > >> It looks good ...
> > >
> > > Thanks :)
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > James
> > > -------
> > > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Hiram
>
> Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
>
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Website Up!
Posted by Hiram Chirino <hi...@hiramchirino.com>.
I actually think that we should setup the site so that we keep java
doc up for all releases previously done.
On 2/2/07, Brian McCallister <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> Speaking of the site, what are the chances we can keep the javadoc
> link pointing to the current release instead of trunk?
>
> -Brian
>
> On Feb 2, 2007, at 6:31 AM, James Strachan wrote:
>
> > On 2/2/07, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Actually, the cron is set up to run hourly and not daily,
> >> so the changes are already active ...
> >
> > Ah great thanks - thats good to know :)
> >
> >> It looks good ...
> >
> > Thanks :)
> >
> > --
> >
> > James
> > -------
> > http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
>
--
Regards,
Hiram
Blog: http://hiramchirino.com
Re: Website Up!
Posted by Brian McCallister <br...@apache.org>.
Speaking of the site, what are the chances we can keep the javadoc
link pointing to the current release instead of trunk?
-Brian
On Feb 2, 2007, at 6:31 AM, James Strachan wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Actually, the cron is set up to run hourly and not daily,
>> so the changes are already active ...
>
> Ah great thanks - thats good to know :)
>
>> It looks good ...
>
> Thanks :)
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Website Up!
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 2/2/07, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Actually, the cron is set up to run hourly and not daily,
> so the changes are already active ...
Ah great thanks - thats good to know :)
> It looks good ...
Thanks :)
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Website Up!
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Actually, the cron is set up to run hourly and not daily,
so the changes are already active ...
It looks good ...
On 2/2/07, James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/1/07, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The web site is now an rsync from the cwiki ACTIVEMQ space.
> > It is updated daily with a rsync + svn up.
>
> Awesome!
>
> > ... and I have removed the incubator logo ;-)
>
> As an experiment, I've tried adding an Apache logo in there instead -
> I'll wait 24 hours and see what the rsync looks like to see if it
> looks OK (we might wanna shrink it a tad)
>
> --
>
> James
> -------
> http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/
Re: Website Up!
Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.
On 2/1/07, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The web site is now an rsync from the cwiki ACTIVEMQ space.
> It is updated daily with a rsync + svn up.
Awesome!
> ... and I have removed the incubator logo ;-)
As an experiment, I've tried adding an Apache logo in there instead -
I'll wait 24 hours and see what the rsync looks like to see if it
looks OK (we might wanna shrink it a tad)
--
James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/
Re: Website Up!
Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
The web site is now an rsync from the cwiki ACTIVEMQ space.
It is updated daily with a rsync + svn up.
... and I have removed the incubator logo ;-)
On 2/1/07, Brian McCallister <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> http://activemq.apache.org/ is live :-)
>
> No we need to remove the "Incubator" stuff from it :-)
>
> -Brian
>
--
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Architect, LogicBlaze (http://www.logicblaze.com/)
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/