You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@orc.apache.org by Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> on 2016/01/15 18:49:10 UTC

[DISCUSS] Make ORC release without the Java code

Ok, based on your feedback, I'd like to make a release with just the C++
code. I'll volunteer as Release Manager. A couple of questions:


   1.  Which number should we use? I'd propose 1.0.0.
   2. Any blocker bugs? I'm going to tackle ORC-8 today because I believe
   it is a blocker not supporting compression in the file-metadata command.

Let's aim for a quick turn around and get a release candidate on Monday.

Thoughts?
   Owen

Re: [DISCUSS] Make ORC release without the Java code

Posted by Prasanth J <j....@gmail.com>.
+1 for release without Java code.

Thanks
Prasanth
> On Jan 15, 2016, at 1:14 PM, Aliaksei Sandryhaila <as...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> +1 on version 1.0.0.
> 
> Of all currently open bugs (except ORC-8), only ORC-7 looks like it needs a fix before making a release. Unfortunately, the earliest I can only work on it is the next week.
> 
> Aliaksei.
> 
> 
> On 01/15/2016 12:49 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
>> Ok, based on your feedback, I'd like to make a release with just the C++
>> code. I'll volunteer as Release Manager. A couple of questions:
>> 
>> 
>>    1.  Which number should we use? I'd propose 1.0.0.
>>    2. Any blocker bugs? I'm going to tackle ORC-8 today because I believe
>>    it is a blocker not supporting compression in the file-metadata command.
>> 
>> Let's aim for a quick turn around and get a release candidate on Monday.
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>>    Owen
>> 
>

Re: [DISCUSS] Make ORC release without the Java code

Posted by Aliaksei Sandryhaila <as...@apache.org>.
+1 on version 1.0.0.

Of all currently open bugs (except ORC-8), only ORC-7 looks like it 
needs a fix before making a release. Unfortunately, the earliest I can 
only work on it is the next week.

Aliaksei.


On 01/15/2016 12:49 PM, Owen O'Malley wrote:
> Ok, based on your feedback, I'd like to make a release with just the C++
> code. I'll volunteer as Release Manager. A couple of questions:
>
>
>     1.  Which number should we use? I'd propose 1.0.0.
>     2. Any blocker bugs? I'm going to tackle ORC-8 today because I believe
>     it is a blocker not supporting compression in the file-metadata command.
>
> Let's aim for a quick turn around and get a release candidate on Monday.
>
> Thoughts?
>     Owen
>