You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@spamassassin.apache.org by Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> on 2006/12/26 17:30:25 UTC
Re: svn commit: r490206 - in /spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1: 20_dnsbl_tests.cf 30_text_de.cf 30_text_nl.cf
I don't think we should add PBL to 3.1 -- (a) there's no data there
yet, and (b) it'll take a rescore run to figure out appropriate
scoring.
--j.
felicity@apache.org writes:
> Author: felicity
> Date: Mon Dec 25 17:40:12 2006
> New Revision: 490206
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=490206
> Log:
> sbl+xbl is now zen. add in rule for PBL as well
>
> Modified:
> spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1/20_dnsbl_tests.cf
> spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1/30_text_de.cf
> spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1/30_text_nl.cf
>
> Modified: spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1/20_dnsbl_tests.cf
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1/20_dnsbl_tests.cf?view=diff&rev=490206&r1=490205&r2=490206
> ==============================================================================
> --- spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1/20_dnsbl_tests.cf (original)
> +++ spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1/20_dnsbl_tests.cf Mon Dec 25 17:40:12 2006
> @@ -129,26 +129,32 @@
> #reuse RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL
>
> # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -# Spamhaus SBL+XBL
> +# Spamhaus ZEN (was SBL, XBL, and PBL)
> #
> # Spamhaus XBL contains both the Abuseat CBL (cbl.abuseat.org) and Blitzed
> # OPM (opm.blitzed.org) lists so it's not necessary to query those as well.
>
> -header __RCVD_IN_SBL_XBL eval:check_rbl('sblxbl', 'sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org.')
> -describe __RCVD_IN_SBL_XBL Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL+XBL
> -tflags __RCVD_IN_SBL_XBL net
> +header __RCVD_IN_ZEN eval:check_rbl('zen', 'zen.spamhaus.org.')
> +describe __RCVD_IN_ZEN Received via a relay in Spamhaus ZEN
> +tflags __RCVD_IN_ZEN net
>
> # SBL is the Spamhaus Block List: http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/
> -header RCVD_IN_SBL eval:check_rbl_sub('sblxbl', '127.0.0.2')
> +header RCVD_IN_SBL eval:check_rbl_sub('zen', '127.0.0.2')
> describe RCVD_IN_SBL Received via a relay in Spamhaus SBL
> tflags RCVD_IN_SBL net
> #reuse RCVD_IN_SBL
>
> # XBL is the Exploits Block List: http://www.spamhaus.org/xbl/
> -header RCVD_IN_XBL eval:check_rbl('sblxbl-lastexternal', 'sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org.', '127.0.0.[456]')
> +header RCVD_IN_XBL eval:check_rbl('zen-lastexternal', 'zen.spamhaus.org.', '127.0.0.[456]')
> describe RCVD_IN_XBL Received via a relay in Spamhaus XBL
> tflags RCVD_IN_XBL net
> #reuse RCVD_IN_XBL
> +
> +# PBL is the Policy Block List: http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/
> +header RCVD_IN_PBL eval:check_rbl('zen-lastexternal', 'zen.spamhaus.org.', '127.0.0.1[01]')
> +describe RCVD_IN_PBL Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
> +tflags RCVD_IN_PBL net
> +#reuse RCVD_IN_PBL
>
> # ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> # RFC-Ignorant blacklists (both name and IP based)
>
> Modified: spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1/30_text_de.cf
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1/30_text_de.cf?view=diff&rev=490206&r1=490205&r2=490206
> ==============================================================================
> --- spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1/30_text_de.cf (original)
> +++ spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1/30_text_de.cf Mon Dec 25 17:40:12 2006
> @@ -99,9 +99,9 @@
> lang de describe RCVD_IN_SORBS_BLOCK SORBS: Senderechner verweigert Tests
> lang de describe RCVD_IN_SORBS_ZOMBIE SORBS: Senderechner in Liste "entführter" Adressblöcke
> lang de describe RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL SORBS: Senderechner nur temporär mit Internet verbunden
> -lang de describe __RCVD_IN_SBL_XBL Transportiert via Rechner in SBL+XBL-Liste (http://www.spamhaus.org/)
> lang de describe RCVD_IN_SBL Transportiert via Rechner in SBL-Liste (http://www.spamhaus.org/sbl/)
> lang de describe RCVD_IN_XBL Transportiert via Rechner in XBL-Liste (http://www.spamhaus.org/xbl/)
> +lang de describe RCVD_IN_PBL Transportiert via Rechner in PBL-Liste (http://www.spamhaus.org/pbl/)
> lang de describe DNS_FROM_RFC_DSN Absender in dsn-Liste von www.rfc-ignorant.org
> lang de describe DNS_FROM_RFC_POST Absender in postmaster-Liste von www.rfc-ignorant.org
> lang de describe DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE Absender in abuse-Liste von www.rfc-ignorant.org
>
> Modified: spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1/30_text_nl.cf
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1/30_text_nl.cf?view=diff&rev=490206&r1=490205&r2=490206
> ==============================================================================
> --- spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1/30_text_nl.cf (original)
> +++ spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1/30_text_nl.cf Mon Dec 25 17:40:12 2006
> @@ -61,9 +61,9 @@
> lang nl describe RCVD_IN_SORBS_BLOCK SORBS: verzender weigert getest te worden
> lang nl describe RCVD_IN_SORBS_ZOMBIE SORBS: verzender is een gekaapt netwerk
> lang nl describe RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL SORBS: bericht is direct verstuurd vanaf een dynamisch IP adres
> -lang nl describe __RCVD_IN_SBL_XBL Ontvangen via een relay die gevonden is in Spamhaus SBL+XBL
> lang nl describe RCVD_IN_SBL Ontvangen via een relay die gevonden is in Spamhaus SBL
> lang nl describe RCVD_IN_XBL Ontvangen via een relay die gevonden is in Spamhaus XBL
> +lang nl describe RCVD_IN_PBL Ontvangen via een relay die gevonden is in Spamhaus PBL
> lang nl describe RCVD_IN_DSBL Ontvangen via een relay die gevonden is in list.dsbl.org
> lang nl describe RCVD_IN_BSP_TRUSTED Verzender is opgenomen in het Bonded Sender Program (trusted relay)
> lang nl describe RCVD_IN_BSP_OTHER Verzender is opgenomen in het Bonded Sender Program (other relay)
Re: svn commit: r490206 - in /spamassassin/rules/branches/3.1: 20_dnsbl_tests.cf 30_text_de.cf 30_text_nl.cf
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>.
On Tue, Dec 26, 2006 at 04:30:25PM +0000, Justin Mason wrote:
> I don't think we should add PBL to 3.1 -- (a) there's no data there
> yet, and (b) it'll take a rescore run to figure out appropriate
> scoring.
We can set the score low (like 0.001), but we'll want live data in the corpus
for reuse to work during net runs. I think I left it in there as a default 1,
but I'll lower it in a minute.
Speaking of which, if there's any other network tests which haven't been put
in the 3.1 rules yet, we'll want to do that so we can start using reuse during
the weekly and scoregen runs.
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"We use a NetApp 820 with Oracle8i (running on win2k)- The machine
itself is amazing. Fast, reliable, smarter than us when it breaks,
and support is great."
- JoAnne Martone in <00...@oit.ads.umass.edu>