RE: Please review proposed LDAP Scheme for UDDI RFC (3rd draft)

[Vijay KN <KN...@novell.com>]

Andy,

We have a working prototype for a UDDIv2 server that has been upgraded
to work in context of a v3 server - so while it provides a UDDIv2
front-end to UDDIv2 clients, internally it works as a v3 server and
updates the LDAP backend with objects in line with new UDDIv3 LDAP
schema defined in the draft.  We have not yet started on coding the
UDDIv3 server yet. Also, we plan to develop a UDDIv3 client in future,
we don't have anything right now.

If you are interested in a UDDIv2 server and client, we have a full
implementation available on the forge.novell.com site - ofcourse this
works with the UDDIv2 LDAP Schema defined in the previous version of the
LDAP Schema for UDDI draft. 

regards
Vijay

>>> "Andy Cutright" <An...@borland.com> 12/15/2003 11:48:48 PM
>>>
i've read this over. my familiarity with LDAP is unfortunately limited.


it appears to cover the fundamental UDDI data structures effectively.
do
you have a working prototype yet? any client engines? 

cheers,
andy

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 6:16 PM
> To: directory-dev@incubator.apache.org; juddi-dev@ws.apache.org 
> Cc: Bruce Bergeson; Kent Boogert
> Subject: Please review proposed LDAP Scheme for UDDI RFC (3rd draft)
> 
> 
> Directory and jUDDI Developers (yes, I realize that jUDDI is 
> over SQL :-)),
> 
> Bruce Bergeson (Novell) has provided a preview of the third draft of
a
> proposed RFC for implementing UDDI using LDAP, and has asked 
> for comments
> before it is sent to the IETF.  I have uploaded the draft to
> http://www.apache.org/~noel/draft-bergeson-uddi-ldap-schema-03.pdf.
> 
> Their timeframe is fairly short, but they welcome all 
> feedback and will
> incorporate changes before release.  If we can get them 
> comments in time.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> 	--- Noel
> 
>