You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tuscany.apache.org by Mike Edwards <mi...@gmail.com> on 2009/01/02 10:33:43 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.4 (RC4) - a question
Ram,
A question I'd like to ask concerns the (non) licensing of some Tuscany files.
I took a look at the manifest files (.MF) which are here:
tuscany-sca-1.4-src\itest\osgi-contribution\contribution-classes\src\main\resources\osgi
None of these have any license statement.
However, I note that the manifest files contained in the modules in the 2.0 stream have entries like
this:
Bundle-License: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
...so that it is perfectly possible to correctly mark the manifests with an appropriate license.
Should all these manifest files be updated with this license statement?
Yours, Mike.
Ramkumar R wrote:
> Wish you all a HAPPY AND PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR!!
>
>
> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.4 release are now
> available, please review and vote to release.
>
> The artifacts are available for at:
> http://people.apache.org/~ramkumar/tuscany/1.4RC4/
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eramkumar/tuscany/1.4RC4/>
>
> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging
> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT report.
>
> The SVN tag for the release is:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.4RC4/
>
> Here's my +1 to release.
>
> --
> Thanks & Regards,
> Ramkumar Ramalingam
Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 1.4 (RC4) - a question
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
>From the ASF legal point of view AFAIK there is no requirement to have a
manifest Bundle-License entry so i think the 1.4 artifacts are ok without
it.
...ant
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 9:33 AM, Mike Edwards <
mike.edwards.inglenook@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ram,
>
> A question I'd like to ask concerns the (non) licensing of some Tuscany
> files.
>
> I took a look at the manifest files (.MF) which are here:
>
>
> tuscany-sca-1.4-src\itest\osgi-contribution\contribution-classes\src\main\resources\osgi
>
> None of these have any license statement.
>
> However, I note that the manifest files contained in the modules in the 2.0
> stream have entries like this:
>
> Bundle-License: http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0.txt
>
> ...so that it is perfectly possible to correctly mark the manifests with an
> appropriate license.
>
> Should all these manifest files be updated with this license statement?
>
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
>
> Ramkumar R wrote:
>
>> Wish you all a HAPPY AND PROSPEROUS NEW YEAR!!
>>
>>
>> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.4 release are now
>> available, please review and vote to release.
>>
>> The artifacts are available for at:
>> http://people.apache.org/~ramkumar/tuscany/1.4RC4/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eramkumar/tuscany/1.4RC4/><
>> http://people.apache.org/%7Eramkumar/tuscany/1.4RC4/>
>>
>> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging
>> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT report.
>>
>> The SVN tag for the release is:
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.4RC4/
>>
>> Here's my +1 to release.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks & Regards,
>> Ramkumar Ramalingam
>>
>
>