[RESULT] [VOTE] Apache Jena 4.0.0 RC 1

[Andy Seaborne <an...@apache.org>]

The vote passes with 3 +1 from Bruno, Aaron and Andy

Thank you!

     Andy

On 27/03/2021 12:24, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Here is a vote on the release of Apache Jena 4.0.0.
> This is the first proposed release candidate.
> 
> The deadline is Tuesday, 30 March 2021 at 21:00 UTC
> 
> Please vote to approve this release:
> 
>          [ ] +1 Approve the release
>          [ ]  0 Don't care
>          [ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
> 
> ==== Major items in this release
> 
> * Require Java11
> 
> * RDF-star implementation
> 
> * Retire jena-sdb
> * Retire jena-text-es
> * Retire jena-elephas
> 
> * Model API Fix: Alt, Seq, Bad (Containers)
> * jena-core: rename RDFReader as RDFReaderI
>     and RDFWriter a RDFWriterI to avoid name clashes
> 
> * IRIx abstraction
> 
> * Deprecation cleanup
> 
> * Remove property functions:
>          list:listMember list:listIndex, list:listLength
>     Use list:member, list:index, list:length
> 
> * Single command line tool package:
>     jena.cmd.* -> org.apache.jena.cmd.*
> 
> * Lucene upgrade to 8.8.0.
>    Reload may be necessary.
> 
> * Other dependency upgrades
> 
> * Scripting improvements (JENA-1951)
> 
> * Very old MIME types "x-"* and text/nquads removed.
> 
> 
> ==== Changes for 4.0.0
> 
> See for JIRA tickets:
> https://s.apache.org/jena-4.0.0-jira
> 
> ==== Release Vote
> 
> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote.
> Please download and test the proposed release.
> 
> Staging repository:
>    https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-1042
> 
> Proposed dist/ area:
>    https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/jena/
> 
> Keys:
>    https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
> 
> Git commit (browser URL):
>    https://github.com/apache/jena/commit/012166721c
> 
> Git Commit Hash:
>    012166721cb6c02f510af949443198a3ddea035c
> 
> Git Commit Tag:
>    jena-4.0.0
> 
> This vote will be open until at least
> 
>      Tuesday, 30 March 2021 at 21:00 UTC
> 
> If you expect to check the release but the time limit does not work
> for you, please email within the schedule above with an expected time
> and we can extend the vote period.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
>        Andy
> 
> Checking needed:
> 
> + are the GPG signatures fine?
> + are the checksums correct?
> + is there a source archive?
> 
> + can the source archive really be built?
>            (NB This requires a "mvn install" first time)
> + is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
>            (both source and binary artifacts)?
> + does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
> + have any licenses of dependencies changed due to upgrades?
>             if so have LICENSE and NOTICE been upgraded appropriately?
> + does the tag/commit in the SCM contain reproducible sources?