You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@oodt.apache.org by Radu Manole <ma...@gmail.com> on 2015/06/24 00:06:26 UTC
Apache Avro - using strings or creating schema objects.
I have a question, in the catalog module, I want to use avro-rpc from
CommunicationChannel, based on xmlrpc example. But xmlrpc implementation is
using a Serializer class to transform OODT objects to strings. This is done
because xmlrpc support strings by default. My question is,
witch is better for avro-rpc, to create objects using avro schema, or to
use Serializer class and send strings.
Momentary I will implement using strings.
Thanks,
Radu.
Re: Apache Avro - using strings or creating schema objects.
Posted by Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>.
Hi Radu,
The IDL is also an excellent way to go but please consider the JSON schemas
I provided you with, they will most likely save you trouble.
Thanks
Lewis
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Radu Manole <ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
> I am not sure, but I think avro-ipc uses jansson internally.
>
> Lewis, the examples that you gave me are helping me to build filemgr types.
> I also thinking about using AVRO IDL.
>
> Thanks,
>
> 2015-06-24 1:32 GMT+03:00 BW <bw...@mysoftcloud.com>:
>
> > You can also embed jannson in Avro-rpc.
> >
> > On Tuesday, June 23, 2015, Lewis John Mcgibbney <
> lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com
> > >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Radu,
> > > Did you check out the Objects I've created at
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-658
> > > They may go a long way to helping you out.
> > > Lewis
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Radu Manole <manole.v.radu@gmail.com
> > > <javascript:;>>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I have a question, in the catalog module, I want to use avro-rpc from
> > > > CommunicationChannel, based on xmlrpc example. But xmlrpc
> > implementation
> > > is
> > > > using a Serializer class to transform OODT objects to strings. This
> is
> > > done
> > > > because xmlrpc support strings by default. My question is,
> > > > witch is better for avro-rpc, to create objects using avro schema, or
> > to
> > > > use Serializer class and send strings.
> > > >
> > > > Momentary I will implement using strings.
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Radu.
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > *Lewis*
> > >
> >
>
--
*Lewis*
Re: Apache Avro - using strings or creating schema objects.
Posted by Radu Manole <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hello,
I am not sure, but I think avro-ipc uses jansson internally.
Lewis, the examples that you gave me are helping me to build filemgr types.
I also thinking about using AVRO IDL.
Thanks,
2015-06-24 1:32 GMT+03:00 BW <bw...@mysoftcloud.com>:
> You can also embed jannson in Avro-rpc.
>
> On Tuesday, June 23, 2015, Lewis John Mcgibbney <lewis.mcgibbney@gmail.com
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Radu,
> > Did you check out the Objects I've created at
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-658
> > They may go a long way to helping you out.
> > Lewis
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Radu Manole <manole.v.radu@gmail.com
> > <javascript:;>>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I have a question, in the catalog module, I want to use avro-rpc from
> > > CommunicationChannel, based on xmlrpc example. But xmlrpc
> implementation
> > is
> > > using a Serializer class to transform OODT objects to strings. This is
> > done
> > > because xmlrpc support strings by default. My question is,
> > > witch is better for avro-rpc, to create objects using avro schema, or
> to
> > > use Serializer class and send strings.
> > >
> > > Momentary I will implement using strings.
> > > Thanks,
> > > Radu.
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > *Lewis*
> >
>
Re: Apache Avro - using strings or creating schema objects.
Posted by BW <bw...@mysoftcloud.com>.
You can also embed jannson in Avro-rpc.
On Tuesday, June 23, 2015, Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hi Radu,
> Did you check out the Objects I've created at
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-658
> They may go a long way to helping you out.
> Lewis
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Radu Manole <manole.v.radu@gmail.com
> <javascript:;>>
> wrote:
>
> > I have a question, in the catalog module, I want to use avro-rpc from
> > CommunicationChannel, based on xmlrpc example. But xmlrpc implementation
> is
> > using a Serializer class to transform OODT objects to strings. This is
> done
> > because xmlrpc support strings by default. My question is,
> > witch is better for avro-rpc, to create objects using avro schema, or to
> > use Serializer class and send strings.
> >
> > Momentary I will implement using strings.
> > Thanks,
> > Radu.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> *Lewis*
>
Re: Apache Avro - using strings or creating schema objects.
Posted by Lewis John Mcgibbney <le...@gmail.com>.
Hi Radu,
Did you check out the Objects I've created at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OODT-658
They may go a long way to helping you out.
Lewis
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Radu Manole <ma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> I have a question, in the catalog module, I want to use avro-rpc from
> CommunicationChannel, based on xmlrpc example. But xmlrpc implementation is
> using a Serializer class to transform OODT objects to strings. This is done
> because xmlrpc support strings by default. My question is,
> witch is better for avro-rpc, to create objects using avro schema, or to
> use Serializer class and send strings.
>
> Momentary I will implement using strings.
> Thanks,
> Radu.
>
--
*Lewis*