queueing up changesets offline

["Robert P. J. Day" <rp...@crashcourse.ca>]

(i'm fairly sure i know the answer to this, but i'll ask it,
anyway.)

  given my reading of changelists, it seems clear that they work only
on a per-fileset basis, with any individual file being in at most one
changelist at a time.

  i'm interested in being able to work on a working copy offline,
where i can make some changes, "stage" those changes as a single,
future commit (along the lines of what "git" can do), then go back to
work, make some more changes (which might proceed from the previous
changes), stage, etc, etc.  when i'm finally done, and i get back on
the net, i can then commit those changes, one at a time and *in that
specific order*, to the repo.

  i can see that changelists don't support that kind of behaviour, but
i've been told that "svk" does.  have people used "svk" for this sort
of thing?  does it work well?  or is there another way to get this
behaviour?  thanks.

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day
Linux Consulting, Training and Annoying Kernel Pedantry:
    Have classroom, will lecture.

http://crashcourse.ca                          Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
========================================================================

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1531800

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org].

Re: queueing up changesets offline

[Ryan Schmidt <su...@ryandesign.com>]

On Apr 3, 2009, at 07:02, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

>   given my reading of changelists, it seems clear that they work only
> on a per-fileset basis, with any individual file being in at most one
> changelist at a time.
>
>   i'm interested in being able to work on a working copy offline,
> where i can make some changes, "stage" those changes as a single,
> future commit (along the lines of what "git" can do), then go back to
> work, make some more changes (which might proceed from the previous
> changes), stage, etc, etc.  when i'm finally done, and i get back on
> the net, i can then commit those changes, one at a time and *in that
> specific order*, to the repo.
>
>   i can see that changelists don't support that kind of behaviour, but
> i've been told that "svk" does.  have people used "svk" for this sort
> of thing?  does it work well?  or is there another way to get this
> behaviour?  thanks.

As far as I know, that's one of the things svk is for. But I haven't  
used it.

------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=1065&dsMessageId=1546079

To unsubscribe from this discussion, e-mail: [users-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org].