You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2011/10/12 01:45:33 UTC
[Bug 6400] GA feedback for Mailspike DNSBL
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6400
Darxus <Da...@ChaosReigns.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Darxus@ChaosReigns.com
--- Comment #1 from Darxus <Da...@ChaosReigns.com> 2011-10-11 23:45:33 UTC ---
You're just looking for optimal scores to recommend to spamassassin users? I
should be able to do that for you. I could run the re-scorer, but I think
maybe it would be better to provide you with a score that would maximize
accuracy given the existing scores of the rest of the tests, instead of doing a
full re-scorer run? Feel free to remind me. I don't think we have enough
masscheck data to pick accurate scores for your L* and H* rules, but your _WL
and _BL rules shouldn't be a problem.
Looks like these rules moved to
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/spamassassin/trunk/rulesrc/sandbox/wtogami/20_mailspike.cf
RuleQA results for them:
http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/?daterev=20111008-r1180336-n&rule=%2Fmspike
Warren, you're recommending using RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL on spamtips.org, why isn't
it in the default rule set? In the last masscheck run, it scored better than
RCVD_IN_PSBL. MSPIKE_WL stuff isn't looking very good though, and for some
reason it's an additional DNS query.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.