You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Colin Alston <co...@thusa.co.za> on 2008/10/28 08:40:53 UTC

Bug #3275

Hello

Would it be possible to see some movement/comment on #3275
(http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3275)? The bug is a
rather serious regression since SVN 1.5.1 which just keeps persisting.
For those that implemented svnsync schemes at release we are pretty much
jammed on 1.5.0 and yelling at users that try to upgrade their clients.

There is a general consensus on the bug that the priority should be
raised to P1. Please can at least that happen so there aren't another 4
revisions that ignore the fact that SVN sync proxy is essentially
completely broken?

Regards,

-- 
Colin Alston <co...@thusa.co.za>

"Some people are like slinkies, they don't really have a purpose, but 
they still bring a smile to your face when you push them down the stairs."


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org

Re: Bug #3275

Posted by Daniel Shahaf <d....@daniel.shahaf.name>.
I think the quickest way to resolve this is for one of the 5-6 people who 
already responded on the issue to volunteer to dig into this himself.  
Don't sit and wait for us to fix it -- ask Jan Nijtmans; his one-line 
mod_dav_svn patch is sitting around uncommitted for a few months now.  :-(

Daniel
(who, OT, wonders if this feature couldn't be implemented client-side...)

Colin Alston wrote on Tue, 28 Oct 2008 at 10:40 +0200:
> Hello
> 
> Would it be possible to see some movement/comment on #3275
> (http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=3275)? The bug is a
> rather serious regression since SVN 1.5.1 which just keeps persisting.
> For those that implemented svnsync schemes at release we are pretty much
> jammed on 1.5.0 and yelling at users that try to upgrade their clients.
> 
> There is a general consensus on the bug that the priority should be
> raised to P1. Please can at least that happen so there aren't another 4
> revisions that ignore the fact that SVN sync proxy is essentially
> completely broken?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org