You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to jdo-dev@db.apache.org by Michael Bouschen <mi...@akquinet.de> on 2017/03/22 19:57:29 UTC

JDO TCK Conference Call Thursday March 23, 10 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

Hi,

We will have our regular meeting Thursday, March 23 at 9 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT) to discuss JDO TCK issues and status. 

We use the new dial-in for audio and video. You need a Skype account to join. 
https://join.skype.com/euV54RJwJBcf 

Agenda:

1. Mail from Craig: setParameters, setNamedParameters

2. JDO-759 "Spec update to clarify whether methods that are documented to be hints must not throw exceptions" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-759: Anything left?

3. New JIRA JDO-761 "Add TCK test running sample queries from the spec" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-761

4. JIRA JDO-760 "Spec update regarding whether Query.execute() returns List or Collection" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-760

5. Is anything still unresolved with JDO-749 "Support for java.time types, and querying using associated methods" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-749

6. Is anything still unresolved with JDO-745 "Support bitwise operations in JDOQL" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-745

7. JDO 3.1: Need to go through change lists in JIRA for 3.1 RC1 and 3.1 to prepare JCP Change Log

8. Other issues

Action Items from weeks past:

[Feb 24 2017] AI Michael: are there any TCK tests for the new methods JDO-749?
[Feb 24 2017] AI Michael: are there any TCK tests for the new methods? Any additional spec updates JDO-745?
[Oct 30 2015] AI Craig: File a maintenance review with JCP
[Apr 17 2015] AI Craig: Oracle spec page on JDO need to be updated once the JCP Maintenance Release for JDO 3.1 is published
[Oct 17 2014] AI Matthew any updates for "Modify specification to address NoSQL datastores": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-651?
[Feb 28 2014] AI Everyone: take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-712
[Feb 28 2014] AI Everyone: take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-625
[Dec 13 2013] AI Craig file a JIRA for java.sql.Blob and java.sql.Clob as persistent field types
[Aug 24 2012] AI Craig update the JIRAs JDO-689 JDO-690 and JDO-692 about JDOHelper methods. In process.

-- 
Michael Bouschen
akquinet tech@spree GmbH
B�lowstra�e 66 \u2022 D-10783 Berlin
Tel:   +49 30 235520-33
Fax:  +49 30 217520-12
E-Mail: michael.bouschen@akquinet.de <ma...@akquinet.de>
Web:   www.akquinet.de <http://www.akquinet.de/>
Gesch�ftsf�hrung: Martin Weber, Dr. Torsten Fink
Amtsgericht Berlin HRB 86780 \u2022 USt.-Id. Nr.: DE 225 964 680
[Facebook] <http://www.facebook.com/akquinet>  [XING]
<https://www.xing.com/companies/akquinetag>  [G+]
<https://plus.google.com/b/111054946250796705170/+akquinet/posts> 
[LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/akquinet-ag>  [Twitter]
<https://twitter.com/akquinet>

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Thursday March 23, 10 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

Posted by Michael Bouschen <mi...@akquinet.de>.
Hi,
> 3. New JIRA JDO-761 "Add TCK test running sample queries from the spec" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-761
>
> Preliminary patch has been applied to the JIRA. AI review the test case. Needs a configuration (jdoql perhaps) that includes the test class. 

I upadated the TCK test class and uploaded a new patch to the JIRA.
Please use the new version for the review.

Regards Michael


-- 
Michael Bouschen
akquinet tech@spree GmbH
B�lowstra�e 66 \u2022 D-10783 Berlin
Tel:   +49 30 235520-33
Fax:  +49 30 217520-12

E-Mail: michael.bouschen@akquinet.de <ma...@akquinet.de>
Web:   www.akquinet.de <http://www.akquinet.de/>

Gesch�ftsf�hrung: Martin Weber, Dr. Torsten Fink
Amtsgericht Berlin HRB 86780 \u2022 USt.-Id. Nr.: DE 225 964 680

[Facebook] <http://www.facebook.com/akquinet>  [XING]
<https://www.xing.com/companies/akquinetag>  [G+]
<https://plus.google.com/b/111054946250796705170/+akquinet/posts> 
[LinkedIn] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/akquinet-ag>  [Twitter]
<https://twitter.com/akquinet>

Re: JDO TCK Conference Call Thursday March 23, 10 AM Pacific Daylight Time (PDT)

Posted by Craig Russell <cr...@oracle.com>.
Attendees: Michael Bouschen, Tilmann Zäschke, Craig Russell

NOTE: Next meeting will be in three weeks on Wednesday April 13 at 9:00 AM Pacific Daylight Time

Agenda:

1. Mail from Craig: setParameters, setNamedParameters

> These methods are the only ones that can be used with the new execute methods to set parameters.
> 
> Sadly, they are not thread-safe, which is a problem considering that the Query object is supposed to be thread-safe.
> 
> I’d like to update the description to include the expected thread behavior:
> 
> * Parameter values are stored in thread local storage so the same Query object
> * can be used by multiple threads simultaneously.

Before we added new Query methods, the execute method provided the parameters. But now, the only way to provide parameters with the new execute methods is via the setParameters and setNamedParameters. This is especially important for named queries where the nominal usage pattern is for the implementation to store the (compiled) Query objects in a Map<String, Query>. 

AI Craig file a JIRA and write a test case to see how RI handles this case. 

2. JDO-759 "Spec update to clarify whether methods that are documented to be hints must not throw exceptions" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-759: Anything left?

Changes to chapter 1 are now accepted. 

3. New JIRA JDO-761 "Add TCK test running sample queries from the spec" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-761

Preliminary patch has been applied to the JIRA. AI review the test case. Needs a configuration (jdoql perhaps) that includes the test class. 

4. JIRA JDO-760 "Spec update regarding whether Query.execute() returns List or Collection" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-760

pending resolution of JDO-761 to verify the examples work. Please be very detailed.

5. Is anything still unresolved with JDO-749 "Support for java.time types, and querying using associated methods" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-749

6. Is anything still unresolved with JDO-745 "Support bitwise operations in JDOQL" https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-745

7. JDO 3.1: Need to go through change lists in JIRA for 3.1 RC1 and 3.1 to prepare JCP Change Log

8. Other issues

Action Items from weeks past:

[Feb 24 2017] AI Michael: are there any TCK tests for the new methods JDO-749?
[Feb 24 2017] AI Michael: are there any TCK tests for the new methods? Any additional spec updates JDO-745?
[Oct 30 2015] AI Craig: File a maintenance review with JCP
[Apr 17 2015] AI Craig: Oracle spec page on JDO need to be updated once the JCP Maintenance Release for JDO 3.1 is published
[Oct 17 2014] AI Matthew any updates for "Modify specification to address NoSQL datastores": https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-651?
[Feb 28 2014] AI Everyone: take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-712
[Feb 28 2014] AI Everyone: take a look at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JDO-625
[Dec 13 2013] AI Craig file a JIRA for java.sql.Blob and java.sql.Clob as persistent field types
[Aug 24 2012] AI Craig update the JIRAs JDO-689 JDO-690 and JDO-692 about JDOHelper methods. In process.

Craig L Russell
Architect
craig.russell@oracle.com
P.S. A good JDO? O, Gasp!