You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Kresten Krab Thorup <kr...@trifork.com> on 2005/11/07 13:52:27 UTC

CORBA

I submitted a patch for GERONIMO-1111 some time last week, and all I  
have heard back is that the JIRA entry now says "patch available".   
Apparently the changes have not been submitted to the trunk; is there  
anything else I should do to make that happen?

It's rather challenging to work effectively here if we cannot share  
code through a source repository.  I understand that you cannot  
guarantee any particular turn around, but if it is this slow then I  
might as well work out of a local source repository here and then  
submit a new tar ball every once in a while.

FYI, we have spent some time last week on the build setup, M2 and  
figuring a good way to do tests and in general just figuring out how  
to "play by the rules here" in the geronimo build world.

Kresten Krab Thorup
krab@trifork.com

"We do not inherit the Earth from our parents, we borrow it from our  
children."
Saint Exupery




Re: CORBA

Posted by Kresten Krab Thorup <kr...@trifork.com>.
> David Jencks wrote:
> While we figure out the best way to compile idl in maven2, the best  
> module structure etc etc could we commit the patches so we don't  
> get into patch hell?  svn is much more convenient to use for source  
> control than jira.  Are the patches entirely against sandbox/ 
> freeorb?   Shall I apply them?

The patch is agains specs/geronimo-specs-corba *and* sandbox/freeorb;  
with this patch you can build the specs with maven 1, and then  
sandbox/freeorb with maven2.  But it seems that Alan is working at  
making it all in Maven2; so perhaps we should better wait till that  
is achieved.

Kresten

> thanks
> david jencks
>
> Hoping to have a minute to look at this very soon....
>
>
> On Nov 7, 2005, at 4:52 AM, Kresten Krab Thorup wrote:
>
>> I submitted a patch for GERONIMO-1111 some time last week, and all  
>> I have heard back is that the JIRA entry now says "patch  
>> available".  Apparently the changes have not been submitted to the  
>> trunk; is there anything else I should do to make that happen?
>>
>> It's rather challenging to work effectively here if we cannot  
>> share code through a source repository.  I understand that you  
>> cannot guarantee any particular turn around, but if it is this  
>> slow then I might as well work out of a local source repository  
>> here and then submit a new tar ball every once in a while.
>>
>> FYI, we have spent some time last week on the build setup, M2 and  
>> figuring a good way to do tests and in general just figuring out  
>> how to "play by the rules here" in the geronimo build world.
>>
>> Kresten Krab Thorup
>> krab@trifork.com
>>
>> "We do not inherit the Earth from our parents, we borrow it from  
>> our children."
>> Saint Exupery
>>
>>
>>
>


Re: CORBA

Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
While we figure out the best way to compile idl in maven2, the best 
module structure etc etc could we commit the patches so we don't get 
into patch hell?  svn is much more convenient to use for source control 
than jira.  Are the patches entirely against sandbox/freeorb?   Shall I 
apply them?

thanks
david jencks

Hoping to have a minute to look at this very soon....


On Nov 7, 2005, at 4:52 AM, Kresten Krab Thorup wrote:

> I submitted a patch for GERONIMO-1111 some time last week, and all I 
> have heard back is that the JIRA entry now says "patch available".  
> Apparently the changes have not been submitted to the trunk; is there 
> anything else I should do to make that happen?
>
> It's rather challenging to work effectively here if we cannot share 
> code through a source repository.  I understand that you cannot 
> guarantee any particular turn around, but if it is this slow then I 
> might as well work out of a local source repository here and then 
> submit a new tar ball every once in a while.
>
> FYI, we have spent some time last week on the build setup, M2 and 
> figuring a good way to do tests and in general just figuring out how 
> to "play by the rules here" in the geronimo build world.
>
> Kresten Krab Thorup
> krab@trifork.com
>
> "We do not inherit the Earth from our parents, we borrow it from our 
> children."
> Saint Exupery
>
>
>


Re: CORBA

Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Kresten Krab Thorup wrote, On 11/7/2005 4:52 AM:

> I submitted a patch for GERONIMO-1111 some time last week, and all I  
> have heard back is that the JIRA entry now says "patch available".   
> Apparently the changes have not been submitted to the trunk; is there  
> anything else I should do to make that happen?
>
> It's rather challenging to work effectively here if we cannot share  
> code through a source repository.  I understand that you cannot  
> guarantee any particular turn around, but if it is this slow then I  
> might as well work out of a local source repository here and then  
> submit a new tar ball every once in a while.
>
> FYI, we have spent some time last week on the build setup, M2 and  
> figuring a good way to do tests and in general just figuring out how  
> to "play by the rules here" in the geronimo build world.


As I had mentioned to you last week, I was a bit busy moving my family 
to our new house.  I'm sorry about the inconvenience.  But, I have to 
say that if you expect people to just check things in as they are, you 
will end up being the only person who knows the code.  That would seem 
to be a situation that you claim to be avoiding.

ATM, we're kinda juggling the specs move and your patch; the specs will 
hold your IDL files.  Both are being moved to Maven 2.  I have made an 
IDLJ plugin and things seem to compile the IDL files.  I will check this 
in tomorrow.


Regards,
Alan