You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Kresten Krab Thorup <kr...@trifork.com> on 2005/11/07 13:52:27 UTC
CORBA
I submitted a patch for GERONIMO-1111 some time last week, and all I
have heard back is that the JIRA entry now says "patch available".
Apparently the changes have not been submitted to the trunk; is there
anything else I should do to make that happen?
It's rather challenging to work effectively here if we cannot share
code through a source repository. I understand that you cannot
guarantee any particular turn around, but if it is this slow then I
might as well work out of a local source repository here and then
submit a new tar ball every once in a while.
FYI, we have spent some time last week on the build setup, M2 and
figuring a good way to do tests and in general just figuring out how
to "play by the rules here" in the geronimo build world.
Kresten Krab Thorup
krab@trifork.com
"We do not inherit the Earth from our parents, we borrow it from our
children."
Saint Exupery
Re: CORBA
Posted by Kresten Krab Thorup <kr...@trifork.com>.
> David Jencks wrote:
> While we figure out the best way to compile idl in maven2, the best
> module structure etc etc could we commit the patches so we don't
> get into patch hell? svn is much more convenient to use for source
> control than jira. Are the patches entirely against sandbox/
> freeorb? Shall I apply them?
The patch is agains specs/geronimo-specs-corba *and* sandbox/freeorb;
with this patch you can build the specs with maven 1, and then
sandbox/freeorb with maven2. But it seems that Alan is working at
making it all in Maven2; so perhaps we should better wait till that
is achieved.
Kresten
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> Hoping to have a minute to look at this very soon....
>
>
> On Nov 7, 2005, at 4:52 AM, Kresten Krab Thorup wrote:
>
>> I submitted a patch for GERONIMO-1111 some time last week, and all
>> I have heard back is that the JIRA entry now says "patch
>> available". Apparently the changes have not been submitted to the
>> trunk; is there anything else I should do to make that happen?
>>
>> It's rather challenging to work effectively here if we cannot
>> share code through a source repository. I understand that you
>> cannot guarantee any particular turn around, but if it is this
>> slow then I might as well work out of a local source repository
>> here and then submit a new tar ball every once in a while.
>>
>> FYI, we have spent some time last week on the build setup, M2 and
>> figuring a good way to do tests and in general just figuring out
>> how to "play by the rules here" in the geronimo build world.
>>
>> Kresten Krab Thorup
>> krab@trifork.com
>>
>> "We do not inherit the Earth from our parents, we borrow it from
>> our children."
>> Saint Exupery
>>
>>
>>
>
Re: CORBA
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
While we figure out the best way to compile idl in maven2, the best
module structure etc etc could we commit the patches so we don't get
into patch hell? svn is much more convenient to use for source control
than jira. Are the patches entirely against sandbox/freeorb? Shall I
apply them?
thanks
david jencks
Hoping to have a minute to look at this very soon....
On Nov 7, 2005, at 4:52 AM, Kresten Krab Thorup wrote:
> I submitted a patch for GERONIMO-1111 some time last week, and all I
> have heard back is that the JIRA entry now says "patch available".
> Apparently the changes have not been submitted to the trunk; is there
> anything else I should do to make that happen?
>
> It's rather challenging to work effectively here if we cannot share
> code through a source repository. I understand that you cannot
> guarantee any particular turn around, but if it is this slow then I
> might as well work out of a local source repository here and then
> submit a new tar ball every once in a while.
>
> FYI, we have spent some time last week on the build setup, M2 and
> figuring a good way to do tests and in general just figuring out how
> to "play by the rules here" in the geronimo build world.
>
> Kresten Krab Thorup
> krab@trifork.com
>
> "We do not inherit the Earth from our parents, we borrow it from our
> children."
> Saint Exupery
>
>
>
Re: CORBA
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Kresten Krab Thorup wrote, On 11/7/2005 4:52 AM:
> I submitted a patch for GERONIMO-1111 some time last week, and all I
> have heard back is that the JIRA entry now says "patch available".
> Apparently the changes have not been submitted to the trunk; is there
> anything else I should do to make that happen?
>
> It's rather challenging to work effectively here if we cannot share
> code through a source repository. I understand that you cannot
> guarantee any particular turn around, but if it is this slow then I
> might as well work out of a local source repository here and then
> submit a new tar ball every once in a while.
>
> FYI, we have spent some time last week on the build setup, M2 and
> figuring a good way to do tests and in general just figuring out how
> to "play by the rules here" in the geronimo build world.
As I had mentioned to you last week, I was a bit busy moving my family
to our new house. I'm sorry about the inconvenience. But, I have to
say that if you expect people to just check things in as they are, you
will end up being the only person who knows the code. That would seem
to be a situation that you claim to be avoiding.
ATM, we're kinda juggling the specs move and your patch; the specs will
hold your IDL files. Both are being moved to Maven 2. I have made an
IDLJ plugin and things seem to compile the IDL files. I will check this
in tomorrow.
Regards,
Alan