You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Steve Harris <st...@kenamea.com> on 2003/11/15 00:45:42 UTC
Changes in james 3.0?
Could someone point me to the list of major changes in 3.0.
I'm thinking of upgrading and I want to get a feel for
what it's going to cost me.
-----Original Message-----
From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:noel@devtech.com]
Sent: Fri 11/14/2003 2:03 PM
To: James Developers List; sbrewin@synsys.com
Cc:
Subject: RE: Future direction for James
> > I am thinking that we could have a JellyProcessor, e.g.,
> > <processor name="custom-stuff"
> > class="org.apache.james.transport.JellyProcessor">
> > ...
> > </processor>
> > allowing the script to handle its own matching and
> > functionality.
> I'm not sure that we need to force Jelly, or any other scripting language
to
> operate in a discrete processor. Doing so would mean that the processor
> could not invoke standard or scripted mailets and matchers without making
> special provision. Reuse would be lost.
Only within that processor. That should not be a problem. We can still
have your ScriptedMatcher and ScriptedMailet, too, but there are some cases
(sieve comes to mind) where the semantic matches up better as a processor
than a matcher/mailet model.
> ??? sieve ???
Sieve. CMU. RFC 3028.
See: http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3028.txt
http://asg.web.cmu.edu/cyrus/sieve/
also lots of projects on SourceForge
I don't know of any Java implementation of Sieve (RFC 3028) as yet.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
RE: Changes in james 3.0?
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
> Cost me in terms of effort from the latest released version.
> I keep seeing people suggest that the 3 code line is better than the
> current packaged version.
The v2.2 line is better. I don't know if we will release it as v2.2 or v3,
but it is better. And fully compatible.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: Changes in james 3.0?
Posted by Steven Harris <st...@kenamea.com>.
Cost me in terms of effort from the latest released version.
I keep seeing people suggest that the 3 code line is better than the
current packaged version.
On Nov 14, 2003, at 9:47 PM, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>> Could someone point me to the list of major changes in 3.0.
>
> James v3 is barely in development.
>
>> I'm thinking of upgrading and I want to get a feel for
>> what it's going to cost me.
>
> Cost you? Upgrade from what version to what version?
>
> --- Noel
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
RE: Changes in james 3.0?
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
> Could someone point me to the list of major changes in 3.0.
James v3 is barely in development.
> I'm thinking of upgrading and I want to get a feel for
> what it's going to cost me.
Cost you? Upgrade from what version to what version?
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org