You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Steve Williams <st...@kromestudios.com> on 2003/12/10 11:22:27 UTC
RedHat RPMs and Apache 2.0.48 (was Re: Subversion 0.33.1 released)
David, is there any progress on RH9.0 RPMs and Apache 2.0.48?
Sly
> > Does anyone have an idea if/when RPMs will be available?
> > I guess it takes (much) more time than normal to create them, given that
> > apache needs to be recompiled as well...
> >
> > I guess 0.34 is due real soon already. Perhaps 0.33 will simply be
skipped?
> >
>
> RPMS will be released as soon as I can get Apache 2.0.48 RPM to compile
> and build. So far, I've tried several different ideas for getting it to
> compile and no luck so far. Currently it is giving a "sed: unterminated s
> command" error during the build.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RedHat RPMs and Apache 2.0.48 (was Re: Subversion 0.33.1 released)
Posted by David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>.
Thanks, I'll check that out tonight.
- David
On Wed, 17 Dec 2003, Chris Croome wrote:
> Further on the problems with the latest apache and subversion on Red Hat
> I have done a bit of digging and perhaps this might help with the
> problems that people have been having...
>
> Apache 2.0.48 is in the testing version of Fedora, the RPMS are here
> (the Freshrpms mirror is a lot faster for me than the Red Hat site):
>
> http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/Fedora/RPMS/
>
> And the SRPM is here:
>
> http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/SRPMS/httpd-2.0.48-3.src.rpm
>
> Also subversion 0.34 has been packaged, SRPM here:
>
> http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/SRPMS/subversion-0.34.0-3.src.rpm
>
> There has been some discussion about subversion on the fedora-devel
> list:
>
> http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2003-December/thread.html#00099
>
> Chris
>
>
--
David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david@summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RedHat RPMs and Apache 2.0.48 (was Re: Subversion 0.33.1 released)
Posted by Chris Croome <ch...@webarchitects.co.uk>.
Hi
Further on the problems with the latest apache and subversion on Red Hat
I have done a bit of digging and perhaps this might help with the
problems that people have been having...
Apache 2.0.48 is in the testing version of Fedora, the RPMS are here
(the Freshrpms mirror is a lot faster for me than the Red Hat site):
http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/Fedora/RPMS/
And the SRPM is here:
http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/SRPMS/httpd-2.0.48-3.src.rpm
Also subversion 0.34 has been packaged, SRPM here:
http://ftp.freshrpms.net/pub/fedora/linux/core/development/i386/SRPMS/subversion-0.34.0-3.src.rpm
There has been some discussion about subversion on the fedora-devel
list:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2003-December/thread.html#00099
Chris
--
Chris Croome <ch...@webarchitects.co.uk>
web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/
web content management http://mkdoc.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RedHat RPMs and Apache 2.0.48 (was Re: Subversion 0.33.1 released)
Posted by Steve Williams <st...@kromestudios.com>.
No idea about source RPMs. I found that article in Google. Note that I'm
not a Linux person. I know just enough to get Subversion RPMs installed on
RH9.
Sly
> > Would this article be any help?
> > "Upgrading Redhat 9 to PHP 4.3.4 and Apache 2.0.48 (Howto)"
> > http://www.involution.com/rh9_php434.php
> >
> > Sly
> >
>
> Actually maybe a little. Any idea where to get the src RPMS for these?
> It spurred me to try building httpd-2.0.48 with apr/apr-util-0.9.4 and
> I've gotten further than before. I'll see if I can get this combo to
> work.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RedHat RPMs and Apache 2.0.48 (was Re: Subversion 0.33.1 released)
Posted by David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>.
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Steve Williams wrote:
> Would this article be any help?
> "Upgrading Redhat 9 to PHP 4.3.4 and Apache 2.0.48 (Howto)"
> http://www.involution.com/rh9_php434.php
>
> Sly
>
Actually maybe a little. Any idea where to get the src RPMS for these?
It spurred me to try building httpd-2.0.48 with apr/apr-util-0.9.4 and
I've gotten further than before. I'll see if I can get this combo to
work.
--
David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david@summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RedHat RPMs and Apache 2.0.48 (was Re: Subversion 0.33.1 released)
Posted by Steve Williams <st...@kromestudios.com>.
Would this article be any help?
"Upgrading Redhat 9 to PHP 4.3.4 and Apache 2.0.48 (Howto)"
http://www.involution.com/rh9_php434.php
Sly
> > >> David, is there any progress on RH9.0 RPMs and Apache 2.0.48?
> > >
> > > No, not yet, sorry. The next thing I'm going to try (but don't really
> > > expect to work) is to try APR/APR-UTIL 0.9.4 with the latest code. I
> > > predict that it won't work because I think apache 2.0.48 and/or
subversion
> > > need the 0.9.5 code.
> >
> > Wow! I'm amazed nobody has yet built Apache 2.0.48 RPMs for RH9. I
> > didn't realise it was so hard.
> >
> > >> > RPMS will be released as soon as I can get Apache 2.0.48 RPM to
compile
> > >> > and build. So far, I've tried several different ideas for getting
it to
> > >> > compile and no luck so far. Currently it is giving a "sed:
unterminated s
> > >> > command" error during the build.
> >
> > I don't have a RedHat system, but I've seen that error in a few other
> > places. If you have the CDPATH environment variable set, then some
> > shells produce output when you cd and that confuses configure.
> > Similarly if some other utility produces unexpected output, or an
> > error message, it can confuse configure. If you are using an unusal
> > shell it might simply be truncating long lines. If there is some
> > dodgy shell quoting around autoconf's use of @ as a delimiter can get
> > mixed with $ and the shell will erroneously expand $@.
> >
> >
>
> Thanks for the clue, but I'm just using regular old BASH just like I've
> always used. 2.0.47 builds fine, 2.0.48 comes up with the "unterminated s
> command"....obviously something to do with sed. Do I need a newer version
> of sed than what comes with Redhat 9?
>
> I tried apr/apr-util-0.9.4 and httpd-2.0.47 and it didn't work either.
> (not surprising)
>
> Fedora Core 1 seems to have built 2.0.48 but I notice they have a newer
> version of sed (4.0.8). RH9 has sed-4.0.5.
>
> Anyone have any ideas or have gotten an RPM of httpd-2.0.48 to build on
> RedHat 9? I've spent weeks (off and on) trying to get this to work.
>
> I've searced GOOGLE but with no luck so far on finding a httpd-2.0.48
> (S)RPM for RedHat 9.
>
> Any pointers appreciated.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RedHat RPMs and Apache 2.0.48 (was Re: Subversion 0.33.1
released)
Posted by Philip Martin <ph...@codematters.co.uk>.
David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us> writes:
> Thanks for the clue, but I'm just using regular old BASH just like I've
> always used. 2.0.47 builds fine, 2.0.48 comes up with the "unterminated s
> command"....obviously something to do with sed. Do I need a newer version
> of sed than what comes with Redhat 9?
I suppose it could be a sed bug, but I think it's unlikely. More
likely is that one of the commands invoked by the configure script is
producing unexpected output, or an error. When the garbled output
gets substituted into the sed input, the result is an invalid sed
script. For example, most configure scripts unset CDPATH because the
cd in some shells will produce a line of output if that variable is
set.
--
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RedHat RPMs and Apache 2.0.48 (was Re: Subversion 0.33.1 released)
Posted by David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>.
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Philip Martin wrote:
> David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us> writes:
>
> > On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Steve Williams wrote:
> >
> >> David, is there any progress on RH9.0 RPMs and Apache 2.0.48?
> >
> > No, not yet, sorry. The next thing I'm going to try (but don't really
> > expect to work) is to try APR/APR-UTIL 0.9.4 with the latest code. I
> > predict that it won't work because I think apache 2.0.48 and/or subversion
> > need the 0.9.5 code.
>
> Wow! I'm amazed nobody has yet built Apache 2.0.48 RPMs for RH9. I
> didn't realise it was so hard.
>
> >> > RPMS will be released as soon as I can get Apache 2.0.48 RPM to compile
> >> > and build. So far, I've tried several different ideas for getting it to
> >> > compile and no luck so far. Currently it is giving a "sed: unterminated s
> >> > command" error during the build.
>
> I don't have a RedHat system, but I've seen that error in a few other
> places. If you have the CDPATH environment variable set, then some
> shells produce output when you cd and that confuses configure.
> Similarly if some other utility produces unexpected output, or an
> error message, it can confuse configure. If you are using an unusal
> shell it might simply be truncating long lines. If there is some
> dodgy shell quoting around autoconf's use of @ as a delimiter can get
> mixed with $ and the shell will erroneously expand $@.
>
>
Thanks for the clue, but I'm just using regular old BASH just like I've
always used. 2.0.47 builds fine, 2.0.48 comes up with the "unterminated s
command"....obviously something to do with sed. Do I need a newer version
of sed than what comes with Redhat 9?
I tried apr/apr-util-0.9.4 and httpd-2.0.47 and it didn't work either.
(not surprising)
Fedora Core 1 seems to have built 2.0.48 but I notice they have a newer
version of sed (4.0.8). RH9 has sed-4.0.5.
Anyone have any ideas or have gotten an RPM of httpd-2.0.48 to build on
RedHat 9? I've spent weeks (off and on) trying to get this to work.
I've searced GOOGLE but with no luck so far on finding a httpd-2.0.48
(S)RPM for RedHat 9.
Any pointers appreciated.
--
David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david@summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RedHat RPMs and Apache 2.0.48 (was Re: Subversion 0.33.1
released)
Posted by Philip Martin <ph...@codematters.co.uk>.
David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us> writes:
> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Steve Williams wrote:
>
>> David, is there any progress on RH9.0 RPMs and Apache 2.0.48?
>
> No, not yet, sorry. The next thing I'm going to try (but don't really
> expect to work) is to try APR/APR-UTIL 0.9.4 with the latest code. I
> predict that it won't work because I think apache 2.0.48 and/or subversion
> need the 0.9.5 code.
Wow! I'm amazed nobody has yet built Apache 2.0.48 RPMs for RH9. I
didn't realise it was so hard.
>> > RPMS will be released as soon as I can get Apache 2.0.48 RPM to compile
>> > and build. So far, I've tried several different ideas for getting it to
>> > compile and no luck so far. Currently it is giving a "sed: unterminated s
>> > command" error during the build.
I don't have a RedHat system, but I've seen that error in a few other
places. If you have the CDPATH environment variable set, then some
shells produce output when you cd and that confuses configure.
Similarly if some other utility produces unexpected output, or an
error message, it can confuse configure. If you are using an unusal
shell it might simply be truncating long lines. If there is some
dodgy shell quoting around autoconf's use of @ as a delimiter can get
mixed with $ and the shell will erroneously expand $@.
--
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: RedHat RPMs and Apache 2.0.48 (was Re: Subversion 0.33.1 released)
Posted by David Summers <da...@summersoft.fay.ar.us>.
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Steve Williams wrote:
> David, is there any progress on RH9.0 RPMs and Apache 2.0.48?
No, not yet, sorry. The next thing I'm going to try (but don't really
expect to work) is to try APR/APR-UTIL 0.9.4 with the latest code. I
predict that it won't work because I think apache 2.0.48 and/or subversion
need the 0.9.5 code.
> Sly
>
> > > Does anyone have an idea if/when RPMs will be available?
> > > I guess it takes (much) more time than normal to create them, given that
> > > apache needs to be recompiled as well...
> > >
> > > I guess 0.34 is due real soon already. Perhaps 0.33 will simply be
> skipped?
> > >
> >
> > RPMS will be released as soon as I can get Apache 2.0.48 RPM to compile
> > and build. So far, I've tried several different ideas for getting it to
> > compile and no luck so far. Currently it is giving a "sed: unterminated s
> > command" error during the build.
>
>
>
--
David Wayne Summers "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david@summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint = C0 E0 4F 50 DD A9 B6 2B 60 A1 31 7E D2 28 6D A8
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org