You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flink.apache.org by Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> on 2016/02/27 10:25:12 UTC

[CANCELLED][VOTE] Release Apache Flink 1.0.0 (RC1)

I cancel this vote in favor of a new RC.

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 1:47 PM, Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org> wrote:

> @Greg: I've merged the two PRs you've mentioned.
>
> Since nobody objected, I'll create now a branch for "release-1.0" and I'll
> update the version in master to 1.1-SNAPSHOT.
>
> Please remember that I'm aiming for creating the next RC later today. I
> keep an eye on blocking issues / open pull requests. If there's nothing
> I'll start creating the RC.
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:10 PM, Stephan Ewen <se...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Just looked at Greg's object juggle PR - looks good for inclusion in the
>> next release candidate.
>>
>> Have not tested the web UI Router fix, but the code looks good.
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have two bugfix pull requests in the stack.
>>
>> [FLINK-3340] [runtime] Fix object juggling in drivers
>>   https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1626
>>
>> [FLINK-3437] [web-dashboard] Fix UI router state for job plan
>>   https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1661
>>
>> Greg
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 8:32 AM, Robert Metzger <rm...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Damn. I agree that this is a blocker.
>> > I use the maven-enforcer-plugin to check for the right maven, but the
>> build
>> > profile that runs the profile is only active during "deploy", not when
>> > packaging the binaries.
>> > That's why I didn't realize that I build the binaries with the wrong
>> maven
>> > version.
>> >
>> > I suggest that we keep collecting problems until Friday afternoon (CET).
>> > Then I'll create the next release candidate.
>> >
>> > I'd also like to address this one:
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-3509
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Fabian Hueske <fh...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi folks,
>> > >
>> > > I think I found a release blocker.
>> > > The flink-dist JAR file contains non-relocated classes of Google Guava
>> > and
>> > > Apache HttpComponents.
>> > >
>> > > Fabian
>> > >
>> > > 2016-02-25 13:21 GMT+01:00 Chesnay Schepler <ch...@apache.org>:
>> > >
>> > > > tested the RC on Windows:
>> > > >
>> > > > - source compiles
>> > > > - some tests categorically fail: see FLINK-3491 / FLINK-3496
>> > > > - start/stop scripts work in both cygwin and windows CMD
>> > > > - ran several examples from batch/streaming/python
>> > > > - scripts also work on paths containing spaces
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On 25.02.2016 12:41, Robert Metzger wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > >> (I'm removing user@ from the discussion)
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Thank you for bringing the pull request to my attention Marton. I
>> have
>> > > to
>> > > >> admit that I didn't announce this RC properly in advance. In the
>> RC0
>> > > >> thread
>> > > >> I said "early next week" and now its Thursday. I should have said
>> > > >> something
>> > > >> in that thread.
>> > > >> The "trigger" for creating the release was that the number of
>> blocking
>> > > >> issues is 0 now.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I did a quick check of the open pull requests yesterday evening and
>> > > found
>> > > >> one [1] to be included into the RC as well. Since the PR you
>> mentioned
>> > > is
>> > > >> marked with [WIP] I thought its not yet ready to be merged.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> I would like to find a solution that works for everyone here: I
>> would
>> > > like
>> > > >> to avoid delaying the release until tomorrow evening, and also the
>> > work
>> > > it
>> > > >> incurs for me create a release candidate.
>> > > >> How about the following: We keep this vote open, test and check the
>> > > >> release
>> > > >> and you merge the change to master in the meantime.
>> > > >> Most likely, the release gets cancelled anyways because we find
>> > > something
>> > > >> and then the next RC will contain your change.
>> > > >>
>> > > >> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1706
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:11 PM, Márton Balassi <
>> > > >> balassi.marton@gmail.com>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Thanks for creating the candidate Robert and for the heads-up,
>> Slim.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> I would like to get a PR [1] in before 1.0.0 as it breaks hashing
>> > > >>> behavior
>> > > >>> of DataStream.keyBy. The PR has the feature implemented and the
>> java
>> > > >>> tests
>> > > >>> adopted, there is still a bit of outstanding fix for the scala
>> tests.
>> > > >>> Gábor
>> > > >>> Horváth or myself will finish it by tomorrow evening.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> [1] https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/1685
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Best,
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Marton
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Slim Baltagi <
>> sbaltagi@gmail.com>
>> > > >>> wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Dear Flink community
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> It is great news that the vote for the first release candidate
>> (RC1)
>> > > of
>> > > >>>> Apache Flink 1.0.0 is starting today February 25th, 2016!
>> > > >>>> As a community, we need to double our efforts and make sure that
>> > Flink
>> > > >>>> 1.0.0 is GA before these 2 upcoming major events:
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>     -  Strata + Hadoop World in San Jose on *March 28-31, 2016*
>> > > >>>>     -  Hadoop Summit Europe in Dublin on *April 13-14, 2016*
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> This is one aspect of the ‘market dynamics’ that we need to take
>> > into
>> > > >>>> account as a community.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Good luck!
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Slim Baltagi
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> On Feb 25, 2016, at 4:34 AM, Robert Metzger <rmetzger@apache.org
>> >
>> > > >>>> wrote:
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Dear Flink community,
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Please vote on releasing the following candidate as Apache Flink
>> > > version
>> > > >>>> 1.0.0.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> I've set user@flink.apache.org on CC because users are
>> encouraged
>> > to
>> > > >>>> help testing Flink 1.0.0 for their specific use cases. Please
>> report
>> > > >>>> issues
>> > > >>>> (and successful tests!) on dev@flink.apache.org.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> The commit to be voted on (
>> > > >>>> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/commit/e4d308d6)
>> > > >>>> e4d308d64057e5f94bec8bbca8f67aab0ea78faa
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Branch:
>> > > >>>> release-1.0.0-rc1 (see
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > >
>> >
>>
>> https://git1-us-west.apache.org/repos/asf/flink/repo?p=flink.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/release-1.0.0-rc1
>> > > >>>> )
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> The release artifacts to be voted on can be found at:
>> > > >>>> http://people.apache.org/~rmetzger/flink-1.0.0-rc1/
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> The release artifacts are signed with the key with fingerprint
>> > > D9839159:
>> > > >>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/flink/KEYS
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> The staging repository for this release can be found at:
>> > > >>>>
>> > >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1063
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> -------------------------------------------------------------
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> The vote is open until Tuesday and passes if a majority of at
>> least
>> > > >>>> three
>> > > >>>> +1 PMC votes are cast.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> The vote ends on Tuesday, March 1, 12:00 CET.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Flink 1.0.0
>> > > >>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because ...
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
>>
>
>