You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@iceberg.apache.org by "Jones, Danny" <dj...@amazon.co.uk> on 2026/08/26 09:33:47 UTC
[DISCUSSION] Moving forward with iceberg-rust 0.11 release
Hey Rust-interested folks,
I’d like to propose that we move forward with a release of iceberg-rust 0.11. I’m happy to volunteer as release manager, and Shawn offered to support me with steps that required committer privileges. The last minor release was cut in June and released in August. I’m hoping we can pull in those two months of changes, and have a much smoother release this time around.
Matt opened a tracking issue[1], please share your thoughts on anything you feel we should block cutting 0.11.x branch for, or if you feel now is or is not the right time.
Danny
[1]: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/3034
Re: [DISCUSSION] Moving forward with iceberg-rust 0.11 release
Posted by Alexander Bailey <za...@gmail.com>.
+1 for a new release! Thanks for driving Danny
On Mon, 31 Aug 2026 at 19:19, <ku...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I’m in agreement with moving forward.
>
> On Aug 31, 2026, at 09:00, Kevin Liu <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> Yes, let's do it!
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 3:20 AM Renjie Liu <li...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 for moving forward with 0.11 release.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 5:34 PM Jones, Danny <dj...@amazon.co.uk>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Rust-interested folks,
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I’d like to propose that we move forward with a release of iceberg-rust
>>> 0.11. I’m happy to volunteer as release manager, and Shawn offered to
>>> support me with steps that required committer privileges. The last minor
>>> release was cut in June and released in August. I’m hoping we can pull in
>>> those two months of changes, and have a much smoother release this time
>>> around.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Matt opened a tracking issue[1], please share your thoughts on anything
>>> you feel we should block cutting *0.11.x* branch for, or if you feel
>>> now is or is not the right time.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Danny
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/3034
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSSION] Moving forward with iceberg-rust 0.11 release
Posted by ku...@gmail.com.
I’m in agreement with moving forward.
> On Aug 31, 2026, at 09:00, Kevin Liu <ke...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> Yes, let's do it!
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 3:20 AM Renjie Liu
> <[liurenjie2008@gmail.com](mailto:liurenjie2008@gmail.com)> wrote:
>
>
>> +1 for moving forward with 0.11 release.
>
>>
>>
>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 5:34 PM Jones, Danny
<[djonesoa@amazon.co.uk](mailto:djonesoa@amazon.co.uk)> wrote:
>
>>
>>> Hey Rust-interested folks, __ __
>>>
>>> __ __
>>>
>>> I’d like to propose that we move forward with a release of iceberg-rust
0.11. I’m happy to volunteer as release manager, and Shawn offered to support
me with steps that required committer privileges. The last minor release was
cut in June and released in August. I’m hoping we can pull in those two months
of changes, and have a much smoother release this time around. __ __
>>>
>>> __ __
>>>
>>> Matt opened a tracking issue[1], please share your thoughts on anything
you feel we should block cutting _0.11.x_ branch for, or if you feel now is or
is not the right time. __ __
>>>
>>> __ __
>>>
>>> Danny __ __
>>>
>>> __ __
>>>
>>> [1]: [ https://github.com/apache/iceberg-
rust/issues/3034](https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/3034) __ __
Re: [DISCUSSION] Moving forward with iceberg-rust 0.11 release
Posted by Kevin Liu <ke...@apache.org>.
Yes, let's do it!
On Mon, Aug 31, 2026 at 3:20 AM Renjie Liu <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 for moving forward with 0.11 release.
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 5:34 PM Jones, Danny <dj...@amazon.co.uk>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey Rust-interested folks,
>>
>>
>>
>> I’d like to propose that we move forward with a release of iceberg-rust
>> 0.11. I’m happy to volunteer as release manager, and Shawn offered to
>> support me with steps that required committer privileges. The last minor
>> release was cut in June and released in August. I’m hoping we can pull in
>> those two months of changes, and have a much smoother release this time
>> around.
>>
>>
>>
>> Matt opened a tracking issue[1], please share your thoughts on anything
>> you feel we should block cutting *0.11.x* branch for, or if you feel now
>> is or is not the right time.
>>
>>
>>
>> Danny
>>
>>
>>
>> [1]: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/3034
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSSION] Moving forward with iceberg-rust 0.11 release
Posted by Renjie Liu <li...@gmail.com>.
+1 for moving forward with 0.11 release.
On Wed, Aug 26, 2026 at 5:34 PM Jones, Danny <dj...@amazon.co.uk> wrote:
> Hey Rust-interested folks,
>
>
>
> I’d like to propose that we move forward with a release of iceberg-rust
> 0.11. I’m happy to volunteer as release manager, and Shawn offered to
> support me with steps that required committer privileges. The last minor
> release was cut in June and released in August. I’m hoping we can pull in
> those two months of changes, and have a much smoother release this time
> around.
>
>
>
> Matt opened a tracking issue[1], please share your thoughts on anything
> you feel we should block cutting *0.11.x* branch for, or if you feel now
> is or is not the right time.
>
>
>
> Danny
>
>
>
> [1]: https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/3034
>