Re: SDO dependencies for SCA 1.0 release, was Fwd: SCA 1.0 release (was Re: Release management for next release, was: SCA 0.92 release?

[Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com>]

Great, so looks like we would need a DAS release compatible with SDO
1.0 in order to include any SCA/DAS integration in the SCA 1.0
release. I'll try to get that done, by cutting a branch and working on
a DAS release sometime this week. Please let me know if there is any
changes in plan.

On 8/28/07, kelvin goodson <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> There are no plans in place yet for the next SDO release.
> 1.0-incubating would seem the obvious choice.
>
> Kelvin.
>
> On 28/08/07, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > That would be my guess unless there's a newer SDO release by then but i've
> > not seen any mention of that in the SDO emails.
> >
> >  ...ant
> >
> > On 8/27/07, Luciano Resende <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > What are you guys thinking about SDO requirements for SCA 1.0 release
> > > ? SDO 1.0-incubating ?
> > >
> > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> > > From: Simon Laws <si...@googlemail.com>
> > > Date: Aug 27, 2007 2:58 AM
> > > Subject: Re: SCA 1.0 release (was Re: Release management for next
> > > release, was: SCA 0.92 release?
> > > To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org, antelder@apache.org
> > >
> > >
> > > On 8/27/07, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On 8/9/07, Venkata Krishnan <for.svkrish@gmail.com > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > <snip>
> > > >
> > > > - Post 0.95, maybe a couple of weeks after the release, we'd cut
> > > > > another branch and head with that for 1.0 release.   Being a 1.0
> > > > > release, we prob. need a branch early as that so that we can whet the
> > > > > things we are targetting for the release.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > This seems like a really good idea to me. The 0.99 release has again
> > > shown
> > > > that it always takes at least a couple of RCs to discover and resolve
> > > > regressions caused by last minute changes and to polish up the samples,
> > > > and
> > > > for 1.0 we're all likely to be a bit more pedantic about readme and
> > > sample
> > > > problems. How about aiming for a 1.0 branch and RC1 around the 14th of
> > > > September? That gives 3 weeks from now for getting things ready and then
> > > > two
> > > > weeks which should enough for 2 or 3 RCs and voting and still get a 1.0in
> > > > September.
> > > >
> > > > I've created a 1.0 JIRA version and started moving into there JIRAs i'd
> > > > like
> > > > to try to get done for 1.0 :
> > > >
> > > >
> > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310210&fixfor=12312698
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > One thing that would be good to do now while they're fresh in our minds
> > > is
> > > > for people to commit fixes to trunk for all the sample and readme issues
> > > > they reported in the 0.99 review so they don't get forgotten till
> > > > 1.0review.
> > > >
> > > >    ...ant
> > > >
> > > +1 from me. I think we are going to need the extra time to fix the many
> > > small things we found this time round.
> > >
> > > Simon
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Luciano Resende
> > > Apache Tuscany Committer
> > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende
> > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
> > >
> > >
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org
>
>


-- 
Luciano Resende
Apache Tuscany Committer
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tuscany-dev-unsubscribe@ws.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tuscany-dev-help@ws.apache.org