You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to cvs@httpd.apache.org by nd...@apache.org on 2012/02/10 22:53:20 UTC
svn commit: r1242950 -
/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties
Author: nd
Date: Fri Feb 10 21:53:19 2012
New Revision: 1242950
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1242950&view=rev
Log:
enter manpage section assignment into property file
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties?rev=1242950&r1=1242949&r2=1242950&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties (original)
+++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties Fri Feb 10 21:53:19 2012
@@ -2,3 +2,23 @@
# No xml files yet
# noxml.fr = upgrading.html.fr
+
+
+manpages.8 = \
+ apachectl \
+ htcacheclean \
+ httpd \
+ rotatelogs \
+ suexec
+
+
+manpages.1 = \
+ ab \
+ apxs \
+ dbmmanage \
+ htdbm \
+ htdigest \
+ htpasswd \
+ httxt2dbm \
+ logresolve
+
Re: svn commit: r1242950 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties
Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* Rainer Jung wrote:
> Should be move ab, apxs and logrotate back to section 8? I think they
> have been there until version 2.2.21 and moving them to section 1 was a
> bug for 2.2.x, because it was only meant to be done for 2.4.x and trunk.
>
> For 2.0.x you already have put them into section 8.
I've just documented the current state (ls -1 man/) - and leave the moving
around to someone else. That would have been my next mail ;-)
nd
--
If God intended people to be naked, they would be born that way.
-- Oscar Wilde
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: docs-unsubscribe@httpd.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: docs-help@httpd.apache.org
Re: svn commit: r1242950 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties
Posted by André Malo <nd...@perlig.de>.
* Rainer Jung wrote:
> Should be move ab, apxs and logrotate back to section 8? I think they
> have been there until version 2.2.21 and moving them to section 1 was a
> bug for 2.2.x, because it was only meant to be done for 2.4.x and trunk.
>
> For 2.0.x you already have put them into section 8.
I've just documented the current state (ls -1 man/) - and leave the moving
around to someone else. That would have been my next mail ;-)
nd
--
If God intended people to be naked, they would be born that way.
-- Oscar Wilde
Re: svn commit: r1242950 - /httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties
Posted by Rainer Jung <ra...@kippdata.de>.
Hi Andre,
nice fix. One remark see below.
On 10.02.2012 22:53, nd@apache.org wrote:
> Author: nd
> Date: Fri Feb 10 21:53:19 2012
> New Revision: 1242950
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1242950&view=rev
> Log:
> enter manpage section assignment into property file
>
> Modified:
> httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties
>
> Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties?rev=1242950&r1=1242949&r2=1242950&view=diff
> ==============================================================================
> --- httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties (original)
> +++ httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/docs/manual/style/build.properties Fri Feb 10 21:53:19 2012
> @@ -2,3 +2,23 @@
>
> # No xml files yet
> # noxml.fr = upgrading.html.fr
> +
> +
> +manpages.8 = \
> + apachectl \
> + htcacheclean \
> + httpd \
> + rotatelogs \
> + suexec
> +
> +
> +manpages.1 = \
> + ab \
> + apxs \
> + dbmmanage \
> + htdbm \
> + htdigest \
> + htpasswd \
> + httxt2dbm \
> + logresolve
> +
Should be move ab, apxs and logrotate back to section 8? I think they
have been there until version 2.2.21 and moving them to section 1 was a
bug for 2.2.x, because it was only meant to be done for 2.4.x and trunk.
For 2.0.x you already have put them into section 8.
Regards,
Rainer