You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@oltu.apache.org by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org> on 2013/03/21 18:49:09 UTC

changing/updating groupId/artifactId

Hi all guys,

since Oltu definitively breaks any Amber backward-compatibility, I'd
like to put a couple of modification, I am here to discuss 'em with
you to collect feedbacks:

 * groupId: we already have in the plan the OpenID Connect
implementation, so I think it would make sense to create sub-groupId,
such as org.apache.oltu for the main parent, org.apache.oltu.oauth2
for the oauth2 components, org.apache.oltu.oidc (or something else)
for OpenID Connect components and so on...

 * artifactId: I would like to move artifactId to OSGi-alike taxonomy,
it makes much more clear what they contain IMHO.

WDYT? Any objection?

Many thanks in advance, all the best!
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/

Re: changing/updating groupId/artifactId

Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
Hi all,

More than 72h have passed, Antonio agreed and no objections have been
shown, I am going ahead and I'll update the artifactId according to
the proposed convention.

Best,
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/


On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
> On Mar 21, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
>
>> Hi Antonio!
>>
>>>>
>>>> * artifactId: I would like to move artifactId to OSGi-alike taxonomy,
>>>> it makes much more clear what they contain IMHO.
>>>
>>> may you provide an example of such ?
>>
>> sure! rather than having oltu-oauth2-authzserver, my proposal is
>> having the groupId in the form org.apache.oltu.oauth2.authzserver.
>
> cool +1 then
>
>>
>> WDYT?
>> best,
>> -Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>> http://www.99soft.org/
>

Re: changing/updating groupId/artifactId

Posted by Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>.
On Mar 21, 2013, at 7:47 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:

> Hi Antonio!
> 
>>> 
>>> * artifactId: I would like to move artifactId to OSGi-alike taxonomy,
>>> it makes much more clear what they contain IMHO.
>> 
>> may you provide an example of such ?
> 
> sure! rather than having oltu-oauth2-authzserver, my proposal is
> having the groupId in the form org.apache.oltu.oauth2.authzserver.

cool +1 then

> 
> WDYT?
> best,
> -Simo
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/

Re: changing/updating groupId/artifactId

Posted by Simone Tripodi <si...@apache.org>.
Hi Antonio!

>>
>> * artifactId: I would like to move artifactId to OSGi-alike taxonomy,
>> it makes much more clear what they contain IMHO.
>
> may you provide an example of such ?

sure! rather than having oltu-oauth2-authzserver, my proposal is
having the groupId in the form org.apache.oltu.oauth2.authzserver.

WDYT?
best,
-Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/

Re: changing/updating groupId/artifactId

Posted by Antonio Sanso <as...@adobe.com>.
Hi Simone,

thanks for brining this up

On Mar 21, 2013, at 6:49 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:

> Hi all guys,
> 
> since Oltu definitively breaks any Amber backward-compatibility, I'd
> like to put a couple of modification, I am here to discuss 'em with
> you to collect feedbacks:
> 
> * groupId: we already have in the plan the OpenID Connect
> implementation, so I think it would make sense to create sub-groupId,
> such as org.apache.oltu for the main parent, org.apache.oltu.oauth2
> for the oauth2 components, org.apache.oltu.oidc (or something else)
> for OpenID Connect components and so on...

+1

> 
> * artifactId: I would like to move artifactId to OSGi-alike taxonomy,
> it makes much more clear what they contain IMHO.

may you provide an example of such ?

Regards

Antonio


> 
> WDYT? Any objection?
> 
> Many thanks in advance, all the best!
> -Simo
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
> http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
> http://www.99soft.org/