[jira] Issue Comment Edited: (LUCENE-1345) Allow Filter as clause to BooleanQuery

["Paul Elschot (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12662687#action_12662687 ] 

paul.elschot@xs4all.nl edited comment on LUCENE-1345 at 1/10/09 12:14 PM:
----------------------------------------------------------------

John, Michael,

bq. Given the perf number improvements we see, can we consider up the priority? 

I think most of the performance improvements that John posted can be moved into
trunk without the addition of Filter as a clause to BooleanQuery. Therefore I'd rather let
these go in before adding Filter as clause to BooleanQuery.


      was (Author: paul.elschot@xs4all.nl):
    John, Michael,

bq. Given the perf number improvements we see, can we consider up the priority? 

I think most of the performance improvements that John posted can be moved into
trunk without the addition of Filter as a clause to BooleanQuery, so I'd rather let
these go first.

  
> Allow Filter as clause to BooleanQuery
> --------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LUCENE-1345
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1345
>             Project: Lucene - Java
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Search
>            Reporter: Paul Elschot
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.9
>
>         Attachments: booleansetperf.txt, DisjunctionDISI.java, DisjunctionDISI.patch, DisjunctionDISI.patch, LUCENE-1345.patch, LUCENE-1345.patch, OpenBitSetIteratorExperiment.java, TestIteratorPerf.java, TestIteratorPerf.java
>
>


-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org