You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@accumulo.apache.org by Christopher <ct...@apache.org> on 2014/04/26 02:35:15 UTC
[VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Accumulo Developers,
Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
Source: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
Binary: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
(Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
given artifact.)
All artifacts were built and staged with:
mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
Release notes (in progress): http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
April 28 01:00 UTC.
(That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
[ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
[ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
[ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
Thanks.
P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
# note the trailing slash is needed
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>.
-1 because of issue w/ license files.
Opened ACCUMULO-2749. I am not sure this should hold up 1.6.0 unless we
can figure out what the problem is in short order.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> Accumulo Developers,
>
> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
>
> Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
> Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
> Source:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
> Binary:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> given artifact.)
>
> All artifacts were built and staged with:
> mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
>
> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>
> Release notes (in progress):
> http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
>
> Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
>
> This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
> April 28 01:00 UTC.
> (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
>
> [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
> [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
>
> Thanks.
>
> P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
> # note the trailing slash is needed
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by John Vines <vi...@apache.org>.
+1
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> Accumulo Developers,
>
> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
>
> Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
> Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
> Source:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
> Binary:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> given artifact.)
>
> All artifacts were built and staged with:
> mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
>
> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>
> Release notes (in progress):
> http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
>
> Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
>
> This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
> April 28 01:00 UTC.
> (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
>
> [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
> [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
>
> Thanks.
>
> P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
> # note the trailing slash is needed
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>.
+1
* Signatures and hashes validated.
* Source artifact matches given commit, modulo previously mentioned
.gitignore file.
* I agree that previous tests needn't be invalidated by changes introduced
in this RC
* Did one last run through the ITs with each of the hadoop profiles
* I am aware of concerns about ACCUMULO-2745 and the recent run of last
minute blockers.
-Sean
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 7:35 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> Accumulo Developers,
>
> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
>
> Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
> Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
> Source:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
> Binary:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> given artifact.)
>
> All artifacts were built and staged with:
> mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
>
> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>
> Release notes (in progress):
> http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
>
> Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
>
> This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
> April 28 01:00 UTC.
> (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
>
> [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
> [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
>
> Thanks.
>
> P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
> # note the trailing slash is needed
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
--
Sean
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
By my count, this vote fails with:
-1 -0 +0 +1 -1 +1 -1 = -1
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> Accumulo Developers,
>
> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
>
> Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
> Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
>
> Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
> Source: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
> Binary: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> given artifact.)
>
> All artifacts were built and staged with:
> mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
>
> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>
> Release notes (in progress): http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
>
> Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
>
> This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
> April 28 01:00 UTC.
> (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
>
> [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
> [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
>
> Thanks.
>
> P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
> # note the trailing slash is needed
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
-1 Reading over the legal/licensing docs the ASF has up made me come to
the conclusion that we should not be making a release with the files
that Mike outlined missing the header.
I'm still working on tests locally to verify things which have otherwise
been going well. I'll try to report back later for full context.
On 4/28/14, 12:20 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
> -1
>
> The good:
>
> * Verified all signatures and checksums.
> * Ran continuous ingest with binary artifact + custom built native maps.
>
>
> The issues, but not enough to vote against:
>
> * Encountered ACCUMULO-2741.
> * Encountered ACCUMULO-2742.
> * Source artifact missing .gitignore
> ** This has been discussed, and I'm voting for precedent here. We can agree
> to disagree, and if this vote passes then a new precedent will have been
> set.
>
>
> The bad:
>
> * CHANGES file contains changes for 1.5.0 and 1.4.0 (BAD)
> ** Past discussion here: http://markmail.org/message/ulvovup36uaa2cav
> ** It seems like we agreed to only include changes from the current major
> release line, but that is not 100% clear.
>
> * Missing licence headers:
> ** README
> ** conf/examples/crypto/readme.txt
> ** test/compat/japi-compliance/README
> ** test/system/continuous/ScaleTest.odp
> **
> docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/HDFS_WAL_states.odg
>
> **
> docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/HDFS_WAL_states.pdf
>
> **
> docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/tablet_states.odg
>
> ** docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/tablet_states.pdf
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Accumulo Developers,
>>
>> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
>>
>> Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
>> Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
>> Source:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
>> Binary:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
>> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
>> given artifact.)
>>
>> All artifacts were built and staged with:
>> mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
>>
>> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>>
>> Release notes (in progress):
>> http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
>>
>> Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
>>
>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
>> April 28 01:00 UTC.
>> (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
>>
>> [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
>> [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
>> [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
>> ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
>> wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
>> # note the trailing slash is needed
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>.
I am seeing consistently slower write rates when comparing 1.5.1 and
1.6.0. Following env :
* hadoop 2.2.0
* Zookeeper 3.4.5
* Centos 6 (native, not a VM)
* using examples/3GB/native-standalone config
* setting tserver.mutation.queue.max 4M
* I am running test/system/test1/ingest_test.sh
* single node
Saw the following rates
1.5.1 aggregate rate : 200,806 records/sec
1.6.0 aggregate rate : 181,264 records/sec (90%)
Reran test setting table.walog.enabled=false
1.5.1 aggregate rate : 302,307 records/sec
1.6.0 aggregate rate : 232,685 records/sec (77%)
I am not sure whats causing this. Has anyone else tried anything like
this? Given the gap is larger when walogs are turned off, this may not be
walog related.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 3:51 PM, Bill Havanki <bh...@clouderagovt.com>wrote:
> -0
>
> With the spate of blockers uncovered during the rc process so far
> [1][2][3], I'm uncomfortable approving the release so quickly after the
> most recent one was resolved. It's true there was a measure of luck in
> these being found when they were, but they appear to be indications that
> the code hasn't been up to snuff until very recently. My vote means "I'd
> rather wait some short amount of time to be sure".
>
> *However*, 1.6.0 really does need to be released, so I'm not willing to go
> all the way with -1. A blocker could come in the day after the eventual
> passing rc, no matter how long we might wait.
>
> In case of passage, tests I've run on rc4 so far: unit tests pass,
> functional tests pass, randomwalk ShortEach passes; randomwalk LongEach in
> progress. (randomwalk on 7-node cluster, 2 masters, 5 tservers, 3 zk, CDH
> 4.5)
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2668
> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2700
> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
>
> Bill H
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > > -1
> > >
> > > The good:
> > >
> > > * Verified all signatures and checksums.
> > > * Ran continuous ingest with binary artifact + custom built native
> maps.
> > >
> > >
> > > The issues, but not enough to vote against:
> > >
> > > * Encountered ACCUMULO-2741.
> > > * Encountered ACCUMULO-2742.
> > > * Source artifact missing .gitignore
> > > ** This has been discussed, and I'm voting for precedent here. We can
> > agree
> > > to disagree, and if this vote passes then a new precedent will have
> been
> > > set.
> > >
> > >
> > > The bad:
> > >
> > > * CHANGES file contains changes for 1.5.0 and 1.4.0 (BAD)
> > > ** Past discussion here: http://markmail.org/message/ulvovup36uaa2cav
> > > ** It seems like we agreed to only include changes from the current
> major
> > > release line, but that is not 100% clear.
> >
> > My understanding from that prior conversation is that, with the way we
> > use JIRA to mark things as fixed in the latest major release and
> > enumerating the fix versions to denote all the bugfix releases in
> > which it was fixed, meant that we can cover the entire CHANGE history
> > (after a certain point) by including only the major releases, and the
> > bugfixes since the last major one. Therefore, since this is a major
> > release, I included the 1.4.0 and 1.5.0 changes also. Anything fixed
> > in 1.5.1 would also be marked as fixed for 1.6.0 (if it still
> > applied), so the 1.6.0 changes include those and 1.5.1 is not needed
> > to list separately. This was not done for 1.5.0, because we hadn't
> > discussed it then.
> >
> > It seems you came to a different understanding from that conversation.
> > If I understand you correctly, it would mean we should only include
> > 1.6.0 changes? If that's the case, do you think a -1 is warranted for
> > including more than necessary (1.4.0 and 1.5.0)?
> >
> > >
> > > * Missing licence headers:
> > > ** README
> > > ** conf/examples/crypto/readme.txt
> > > ** test/compat/japi-compliance/README
> > > ** test/system/continuous/ScaleTest.odp
> > > **
> > > docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/HDFS_WAL_states.odg
> > >
> > > **
> > > docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/HDFS_WAL_states.pdf
> > >
> > > **
> > > docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/tablet_states.odg
> > >
> > > ** docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/tablet_states.pdf
> >
> > The rat check plugin typically ignores README/NOTICE/LICENSE files as
> > category "N" (for Notices). That's why it ignored the
> > japi-compliance/README and conf/examples/crypto/readme.txt. I think
> > it's expected that the LICENSE file covers them. At the very least, I
> > don't think they contain anything copyrightable that would necessitate
> > a license. But, for consistency, maybe we should add it anyway? I'm
> > not sure that consistency argument warrants blockage (for me), though.
> >
> > The rest were ignored because the rat check does not check binary
> > files. These files should be covered by the LICENSE/NOTICE files.
> > Binary document files may or may not be capable of supporting license
> > metadata, in general, but I think the coverage by the LICENSE/NOTICE
> > files is sufficient. However, we can do additional things with these
> > files. The ScaleTest.odp could probably be converted to markdown, with
> > a license header. The state_diagrams are not used anywhere in the
> > LaTeX generation (leftover from old developer manual?), and could
> > probably be deleted or moved to the website or wiki, if they are
> > needed at all. I'm not sure which option is best. However, again, I'd
> > consider the LICENSE/NOTICE files sufficient, so as not to block,
> > especially since they didn't block any previous release (presumably
> > because LICENSE/NOTICE covered them), and they've been around awhile.
> >
>
>
>
> --
> // Bill Havanki
> // Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions
> // 443.686.9283
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by Bill Havanki <bh...@clouderagovt.com>.
-0
With the spate of blockers uncovered during the rc process so far
[1][2][3], I'm uncomfortable approving the release so quickly after the
most recent one was resolved. It's true there was a measure of luck in
these being found when they were, but they appear to be indications that
the code hasn't been up to snuff until very recently. My vote means "I'd
rather wait some short amount of time to be sure".
*However*, 1.6.0 really does need to be released, so I'm not willing to go
all the way with -1. A blocker could come in the day after the eventual
passing rc, no matter how long we might wait.
In case of passage, tests I've run on rc4 so far: unit tests pass,
functional tests pass, randomwalk ShortEach passes; randomwalk LongEach in
progress. (randomwalk on 7-node cluster, 2 masters, 5 tservers, 3 zk, CDH
4.5)
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2668
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2700
[3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
Bill H
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > -1
> >
> > The good:
> >
> > * Verified all signatures and checksums.
> > * Ran continuous ingest with binary artifact + custom built native maps.
> >
> >
> > The issues, but not enough to vote against:
> >
> > * Encountered ACCUMULO-2741.
> > * Encountered ACCUMULO-2742.
> > * Source artifact missing .gitignore
> > ** This has been discussed, and I'm voting for precedent here. We can
> agree
> > to disagree, and if this vote passes then a new precedent will have been
> > set.
> >
> >
> > The bad:
> >
> > * CHANGES file contains changes for 1.5.0 and 1.4.0 (BAD)
> > ** Past discussion here: http://markmail.org/message/ulvovup36uaa2cav
> > ** It seems like we agreed to only include changes from the current major
> > release line, but that is not 100% clear.
>
> My understanding from that prior conversation is that, with the way we
> use JIRA to mark things as fixed in the latest major release and
> enumerating the fix versions to denote all the bugfix releases in
> which it was fixed, meant that we can cover the entire CHANGE history
> (after a certain point) by including only the major releases, and the
> bugfixes since the last major one. Therefore, since this is a major
> release, I included the 1.4.0 and 1.5.0 changes also. Anything fixed
> in 1.5.1 would also be marked as fixed for 1.6.0 (if it still
> applied), so the 1.6.0 changes include those and 1.5.1 is not needed
> to list separately. This was not done for 1.5.0, because we hadn't
> discussed it then.
>
> It seems you came to a different understanding from that conversation.
> If I understand you correctly, it would mean we should only include
> 1.6.0 changes? If that's the case, do you think a -1 is warranted for
> including more than necessary (1.4.0 and 1.5.0)?
>
> >
> > * Missing licence headers:
> > ** README
> > ** conf/examples/crypto/readme.txt
> > ** test/compat/japi-compliance/README
> > ** test/system/continuous/ScaleTest.odp
> > **
> > docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/HDFS_WAL_states.odg
> >
> > **
> > docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/HDFS_WAL_states.pdf
> >
> > **
> > docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/tablet_states.odg
> >
> > ** docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/tablet_states.pdf
>
> The rat check plugin typically ignores README/NOTICE/LICENSE files as
> category "N" (for Notices). That's why it ignored the
> japi-compliance/README and conf/examples/crypto/readme.txt. I think
> it's expected that the LICENSE file covers them. At the very least, I
> don't think they contain anything copyrightable that would necessitate
> a license. But, for consistency, maybe we should add it anyway? I'm
> not sure that consistency argument warrants blockage (for me), though.
>
> The rest were ignored because the rat check does not check binary
> files. These files should be covered by the LICENSE/NOTICE files.
> Binary document files may or may not be capable of supporting license
> metadata, in general, but I think the coverage by the LICENSE/NOTICE
> files is sufficient. However, we can do additional things with these
> files. The ScaleTest.odp could probably be converted to markdown, with
> a license header. The state_diagrams are not used anywhere in the
> LaTeX generation (leftover from old developer manual?), and could
> probably be deleted or moved to the website or wiki, if they are
> needed at all. I'm not sure which option is best. However, again, I'd
> consider the LICENSE/NOTICE files sufficient, so as not to block,
> especially since they didn't block any previous release (presumably
> because LICENSE/NOTICE covered them), and they've been around awhile.
>
--
// Bill Havanki
// Solutions Architect, Cloudera Govt Solutions
// 443.686.9283
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> -1
>
> The good:
>
> * Verified all signatures and checksums.
> * Ran continuous ingest with binary artifact + custom built native maps.
>
>
> The issues, but not enough to vote against:
>
> * Encountered ACCUMULO-2741.
> * Encountered ACCUMULO-2742.
> * Source artifact missing .gitignore
> ** This has been discussed, and I'm voting for precedent here. We can agree
> to disagree, and if this vote passes then a new precedent will have been
> set.
>
>
> The bad:
>
> * CHANGES file contains changes for 1.5.0 and 1.4.0 (BAD)
> ** Past discussion here: http://markmail.org/message/ulvovup36uaa2cav
> ** It seems like we agreed to only include changes from the current major
> release line, but that is not 100% clear.
My understanding from that prior conversation is that, with the way we
use JIRA to mark things as fixed in the latest major release and
enumerating the fix versions to denote all the bugfix releases in
which it was fixed, meant that we can cover the entire CHANGE history
(after a certain point) by including only the major releases, and the
bugfixes since the last major one. Therefore, since this is a major
release, I included the 1.4.0 and 1.5.0 changes also. Anything fixed
in 1.5.1 would also be marked as fixed for 1.6.0 (if it still
applied), so the 1.6.0 changes include those and 1.5.1 is not needed
to list separately. This was not done for 1.5.0, because we hadn't
discussed it then.
It seems you came to a different understanding from that conversation.
If I understand you correctly, it would mean we should only include
1.6.0 changes? If that's the case, do you think a -1 is warranted for
including more than necessary (1.4.0 and 1.5.0)?
>
> * Missing licence headers:
> ** README
> ** conf/examples/crypto/readme.txt
> ** test/compat/japi-compliance/README
> ** test/system/continuous/ScaleTest.odp
> **
> docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/HDFS_WAL_states.odg
>
> **
> docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/HDFS_WAL_states.pdf
>
> **
> docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/tablet_states.odg
>
> ** docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/tablet_states.pdf
The rat check plugin typically ignores README/NOTICE/LICENSE files as
category "N" (for Notices). That's why it ignored the
japi-compliance/README and conf/examples/crypto/readme.txt. I think
it's expected that the LICENSE file covers them. At the very least, I
don't think they contain anything copyrightable that would necessitate
a license. But, for consistency, maybe we should add it anyway? I'm
not sure that consistency argument warrants blockage (for me), though.
The rest were ignored because the rat check does not check binary
files. These files should be covered by the LICENSE/NOTICE files.
Binary document files may or may not be capable of supporting license
metadata, in general, but I think the coverage by the LICENSE/NOTICE
files is sufficient. However, we can do additional things with these
files. The ScaleTest.odp could probably be converted to markdown, with
a license header. The state_diagrams are not used anywhere in the
LaTeX generation (leftover from old developer manual?), and could
probably be deleted or moved to the website or wiki, if they are
needed at all. I'm not sure which option is best. However, again, I'd
consider the LICENSE/NOTICE files sufficient, so as not to block,
especially since they didn't block any previous release (presumably
because LICENSE/NOTICE covered them), and they've been around awhile.
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by Keith Turner <ke...@deenlo.com>.
There was a discussion about CHANGES. I am not sure there could truly be
consensus w/o a vote on that particular subject. I don't think its
something that should hold up 1.6.0
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 5:19 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> Going to vote +0 myself, for the license issues Mike points out.
> I don't have an opinion about the CHANGES file, but I'd like consensus
> before changing it again.
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> > -1
> >
> > The good:
> >
> > * Verified all signatures and checksums.
> > * Ran continuous ingest with binary artifact + custom built native maps.
> >
> >
> > The issues, but not enough to vote against:
> >
> > * Encountered ACCUMULO-2741.
> > * Encountered ACCUMULO-2742.
> > * Source artifact missing .gitignore
> > ** This has been discussed, and I'm voting for precedent here. We can
> agree
> > to disagree, and if this vote passes then a new precedent will have been
> > set.
> >
> >
> > The bad:
> >
> > * CHANGES file contains changes for 1.5.0 and 1.4.0 (BAD)
> > ** Past discussion here: http://markmail.org/message/ulvovup36uaa2cav
> > ** It seems like we agreed to only include changes from the current major
> > release line, but that is not 100% clear.
> >
> > * Missing licence headers:
> > ** README
> > ** conf/examples/crypto/readme.txt
> > ** test/compat/japi-compliance/README
> > ** test/system/continuous/ScaleTest.odp
> > **
> > docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/HDFS_WAL_states.odg
> >
> > **
> > docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/HDFS_WAL_states.pdf
> >
> > **
> > docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/tablet_states.odg
> >
> > ** docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/tablet_states.pdf
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Accumulo Developers,
> >>
> >> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
> >>
> >> Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
> >> Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
> >>
> >> Staging repo:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
> >> Source:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
> >> Binary:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
> >> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> >> given artifact.)
> >>
> >> All artifacts were built and staged with:
> >> mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
> >>
> >> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> >>
> >> Release notes (in progress):
> >> http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
> >>
> >> Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
> >>
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
> >>
> >> This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
> >> April 28 01:00 UTC.
> >> (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> >> [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
> >> [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> >> ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> >> wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
> >> # note the trailing slash is needed
> >>
> >> --
> >> Christopher L Tubbs II
> >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Going to vote +0 myself, for the license issues Mike points out.
I don't have an opinion about the CHANGES file, but I'd like consensus
before changing it again.
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> -1
>
> The good:
>
> * Verified all signatures and checksums.
> * Ran continuous ingest with binary artifact + custom built native maps.
>
>
> The issues, but not enough to vote against:
>
> * Encountered ACCUMULO-2741.
> * Encountered ACCUMULO-2742.
> * Source artifact missing .gitignore
> ** This has been discussed, and I'm voting for precedent here. We can agree
> to disagree, and if this vote passes then a new precedent will have been
> set.
>
>
> The bad:
>
> * CHANGES file contains changes for 1.5.0 and 1.4.0 (BAD)
> ** Past discussion here: http://markmail.org/message/ulvovup36uaa2cav
> ** It seems like we agreed to only include changes from the current major
> release line, but that is not 100% clear.
>
> * Missing licence headers:
> ** README
> ** conf/examples/crypto/readme.txt
> ** test/compat/japi-compliance/README
> ** test/system/continuous/ScaleTest.odp
> **
> docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/HDFS_WAL_states.odg
>
> **
> docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/HDFS_WAL_states.pdf
>
> **
> docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/tablet_states.odg
>
> ** docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/tablet_states.pdf
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Accumulo Developers,
>>
>> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
>>
>> Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
>> Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
>>
>> Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
>> Source:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
>> Binary:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
>> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
>> given artifact.)
>>
>> All artifacts were built and staged with:
>> mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
>>
>> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>>
>> Release notes (in progress):
>> http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
>>
>> Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
>>
>> This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
>> April 28 01:00 UTC.
>> (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
>>
>> [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
>> [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
>> [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
>> ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
>> wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
>> # note the trailing slash is needed
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by Josh Elser <jo...@gmail.com>.
On 4/28/14, 12:20 PM, Mike Drob wrote:
> -1
>
> The good:
>
> * Verified all signatures and checksums.
> * Ran continuous ingest with binary artifact + custom built native maps.
>
>
> The issues, but not enough to vote against:
>
> * Encountered ACCUMULO-2741.
> * Encountered ACCUMULO-2742.
> * Source artifact missing .gitignore
> ** This has been discussed, and I'm voting for precedent here. We can agree
> to disagree, and if this vote passes then a new precedent will have been
> set.
>
>
> The bad:
>
> * CHANGES file contains changes for 1.5.0 and 1.4.0 (BAD)
> ** Past discussion here:http://markmail.org/message/ulvovup36uaa2cav
> ** It seems like we agreed to only include changes from the current major
> release line, but that is not 100% clear.
>
> * Missing licence headers:
> ** README
> ** conf/examples/crypto/readme.txt
> ** test/compat/japi-compliance/README
> ** test/system/continuous/ScaleTest.odp
> **
> docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/HDFS_WAL_states.odg
>
> **
> docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/HDFS_WAL_states.pdf
>
> **
> docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/tablet_states.odg
>
> ** docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/tablet_states.pdf
Should we be trying to get a license included in a non-plaintext file?
(odg, pdf, and odp)
I remember that ScaleTest presentation being an issue before we had the
rat-check automated (correctly) in the build. I haven't seen it since we
got the *apache*-rat-plugin configured.
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com>.
-1
The good:
* Verified all signatures and checksums.
* Ran continuous ingest with binary artifact + custom built native maps.
The issues, but not enough to vote against:
* Encountered ACCUMULO-2741.
* Encountered ACCUMULO-2742.
* Source artifact missing .gitignore
** This has been discussed, and I'm voting for precedent here. We can agree
to disagree, and if this vote passes then a new precedent will have been
set.
The bad:
* CHANGES file contains changes for 1.5.0 and 1.4.0 (BAD)
** Past discussion here: http://markmail.org/message/ulvovup36uaa2cav
** It seems like we agreed to only include changes from the current major
release line, but that is not 100% clear.
* Missing licence headers:
** README
** conf/examples/crypto/readme.txt
** test/compat/japi-compliance/README
** test/system/continuous/ScaleTest.odp
**
docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/HDFS_WAL_states.odg
**
docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/HDFS_WAL_states.pdf
**
docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/tablet_states.odg
** docs/src/main/latex/common/state_diagrams/tablet_states.pdf
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> Accumulo Developers,
>
> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
>
> Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
> Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
>
> Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
> Source:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
> Binary:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> given artifact.)
>
> All artifacts were built and staged with:
> mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
>
> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>
> Release notes (in progress):
> http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
>
> Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
>
> This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
> April 28 01:00 UTC.
> (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
>
> [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
> [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
>
> Thanks.
>
> P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
> # note the trailing slash is needed
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by Mike Drob <ma...@cloudera.com>.
We also have a tendency to vote at the last minute anyway, regardless of
weekend or weekday. I hope that's because everybody is busy running tests.
:)
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:04 AM, Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> I think Friday was fine. I know I've just been silent due to recovery time
> from the surge of activity around making sure RC4 would be ready. I suspect
> it might be the same for others.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:24 AM, William Slacum <
> wilhelm.von.cloud@accumulo.net> wrote:
>
> > Do you think doing this on a Friday was a good idea? I know that point
> came
> > up earlier, and it was possibly due to already discovered issues that
> would
> > fail the release, but I think the lack of traffic on here is significant.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Correction on the vote end date. It's:
> > > Tue, 2014 April 29 01:00 UTC ... or
> > > Mon, 2014 April 28 21:00 EDT (9pm)
> > >
> > > The initial email had the wrong date (28 instead of 29).
> > >
> > > --
> > > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > Accumulo Developers,
> > > >
> > > > Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
> > > >
> > > > Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
> > > > Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
> > > >
> > > > Staging repo:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
> > > > Source:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
> > > > Binary:
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
> > > > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for
> a
> > > > given artifact.)
> > > >
> > > > All artifacts were built and staged with:
> > > > mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
> > > >
> > > > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> > > >
> > > > Release notes (in progress):
> > > http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
> > > >
> > > > Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
> > > >
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
> > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
> > > >
> > > > This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
> > > > April 28 01:00 UTC.
> > > > (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> > > > [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote
> against...
> > > > [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> > > > ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks.
> > > >
> > > > P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> > > > wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
> > > >
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
> > > > # note the trailing slash is needed
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Sean
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by Sean Busbey <bu...@cloudera.com>.
I think Friday was fine. I know I've just been silent due to recovery time
from the surge of activity around making sure RC4 would be ready. I suspect
it might be the same for others.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 7:24 AM, William Slacum <
wilhelm.von.cloud@accumulo.net> wrote:
> Do you think doing this on a Friday was a good idea? I know that point came
> up earlier, and it was possibly due to already discovered issues that would
> fail the release, but I think the lack of traffic on here is significant.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Correction on the vote end date. It's:
> > Tue, 2014 April 29 01:00 UTC ... or
> > Mon, 2014 April 28 21:00 EDT (9pm)
> >
> > The initial email had the wrong date (28 instead of 29).
> >
> > --
> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > > Accumulo Developers,
> > >
> > > Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
> > >
> > > Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
> > > Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
> > >
> > > Staging repo:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
> > > Source:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
> > > Binary:
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
> > > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> > > given artifact.)
> > >
> > > All artifacts were built and staged with:
> > > mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
> > >
> > > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> > >
> > > Release notes (in progress):
> > http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
> > >
> > > Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
> > >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
> > >
> > > This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
> > > April 28 01:00 UTC.
> > > (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> > > [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
> > > [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> > > ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
> > >
> > > Thanks.
> > >
> > > P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> > > wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
> > >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
> > > # note the trailing slash is needed
> > >
> > > --
> > > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >
>
--
Sean
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by John Vines <vi...@apache.org>.
Please change the subject if you're going to change this into a
conversation about when to start votes. This subject is for votes for an RC
candidate.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:30 AM, William Slacum <
wilhelm.von.cloud@accumulo.net> wrote:
> I was concerned about the lack of activity. I don't have a personal need
> for an extension, but I do recall a discussion about Friday RC's
> potentially being problematic in the past, which is why I brought it up.
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > I don't know what everyone's schedules are. If the point of a vote was
> > to begin performing testing, I'd say yes, or if this were RC1, I'd say
> > yes (or extended it to 4 days so it's not a surprise). However, since
> > we're already in the RC mindset, having had 3 prior ones already, an
> > RC4 was already expected to be forthcoming. Since I don't think any of
> > the issues since RC3 invalidate the previous testing, and because this
> > is RC4, having gone through several previous candidates, I think a 3
> > day vote starting on Friday is fine. That gives many people an
> > opportunity to examine the release candidate's changes since the last
> > one, whether they do so on a weekend or whether they do so on Monday.
> >
> > I'm not concerned about the lack of initial activity... that's usually
> > the pattern for votes.
> >
> > Do you think you need extra time to evaluate the release candidate? Do
> > we need to discuss an extension?
> >
> > --
> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:24 AM, William Slacum
> > <wi...@accumulo.net> wrote:
> > > Do you think doing this on a Friday was a good idea? I know that point
> > came
> > > up earlier, and it was possibly due to already discovered issues that
> > would
> > > fail the release, but I think the lack of traffic on here is
> significant.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Correction on the vote end date. It's:
> > >> Tue, 2014 April 29 01:00 UTC ... or
> > >> Mon, 2014 April 28 21:00 EDT (9pm)
> > >>
> > >> The initial email had the wrong date (28 instead of 29).
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Christopher L Tubbs II
> > >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >> > Accumulo Developers,
> > >> >
> > >> > Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
> > >> >
> > >> > Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
> > >> > Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
> > >> >
> > >> > Staging repo:
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
> > >> > Source:
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
> > >> > Binary:
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
> > >> > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash
> for a
> > >> > given artifact.)
> > >> >
> > >> > All artifacts were built and staged with:
> > >> > mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
> > >> >
> > >> > Signing keys available at:
> https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> > >> >
> > >> > Release notes (in progress):
> > >> http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
> > >> >
> > >> > Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
> > >> >
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
> > >> >
> > >> > This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
> > >> > April 28 01:00 UTC.
> > >> > (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
> > >> >
> > >> > [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> > >> > [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote
> against...
> > >> > [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> > >> > ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
> > >> >
> > >> > Thanks.
> > >> >
> > >> > P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> > >> > wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
> > >> >
> > >>
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
> > >> > # note the trailing slash is needed
> > >> >
> > >> > --
> > >> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > >> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> > >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by William Slacum <wi...@accumulo.net>.
I was concerned about the lack of activity. I don't have a personal need
for an extension, but I do recall a discussion about Friday RC's
potentially being problematic in the past, which is why I brought it up.
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 11:21 AM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> I don't know what everyone's schedules are. If the point of a vote was
> to begin performing testing, I'd say yes, or if this were RC1, I'd say
> yes (or extended it to 4 days so it's not a surprise). However, since
> we're already in the RC mindset, having had 3 prior ones already, an
> RC4 was already expected to be forthcoming. Since I don't think any of
> the issues since RC3 invalidate the previous testing, and because this
> is RC4, having gone through several previous candidates, I think a 3
> day vote starting on Friday is fine. That gives many people an
> opportunity to examine the release candidate's changes since the last
> one, whether they do so on a weekend or whether they do so on Monday.
>
> I'm not concerned about the lack of initial activity... that's usually
> the pattern for votes.
>
> Do you think you need extra time to evaluate the release candidate? Do
> we need to discuss an extension?
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:24 AM, William Slacum
> <wi...@accumulo.net> wrote:
> > Do you think doing this on a Friday was a good idea? I know that point
> came
> > up earlier, and it was possibly due to already discovered issues that
> would
> > fail the release, but I think the lack of traffic on here is significant.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> Correction on the vote end date. It's:
> >> Tue, 2014 April 29 01:00 UTC ... or
> >> Mon, 2014 April 28 21:00 EDT (9pm)
> >>
> >> The initial email had the wrong date (28 instead of 29).
> >>
> >> --
> >> Christopher L Tubbs II
> >> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > Accumulo Developers,
> >> >
> >> > Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
> >> >
> >> > Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
> >> > Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
> >> >
> >> > Staging repo:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
> >> > Source:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
> >> > Binary:
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
> >> > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> >> > given artifact.)
> >> >
> >> > All artifacts were built and staged with:
> >> > mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
> >> >
> >> > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> >> >
> >> > Release notes (in progress):
> >> http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
> >> >
> >> > Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
> >> >
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
> >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
> >> >
> >> > This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
> >> > April 28 01:00 UTC.
> >> > (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
> >> >
> >> > [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> >> > [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
> >> > [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> >> > ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks.
> >> >
> >> > P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> >> > wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
> >> >
> >>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
> >> > # note the trailing slash is needed
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> >> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
> >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
I don't know what everyone's schedules are. If the point of a vote was
to begin performing testing, I'd say yes, or if this were RC1, I'd say
yes (or extended it to 4 days so it's not a surprise). However, since
we're already in the RC mindset, having had 3 prior ones already, an
RC4 was already expected to be forthcoming. Since I don't think any of
the issues since RC3 invalidate the previous testing, and because this
is RC4, having gone through several previous candidates, I think a 3
day vote starting on Friday is fine. That gives many people an
opportunity to examine the release candidate's changes since the last
one, whether they do so on a weekend or whether they do so on Monday.
I'm not concerned about the lack of initial activity... that's usually
the pattern for votes.
Do you think you need extra time to evaluate the release candidate? Do
we need to discuss an extension?
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 8:24 AM, William Slacum
<wi...@accumulo.net> wrote:
> Do you think doing this on a Friday was a good idea? I know that point came
> up earlier, and it was possibly due to already discovered issues that would
> fail the release, but I think the lack of traffic on here is significant.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Correction on the vote end date. It's:
>> Tue, 2014 April 29 01:00 UTC ... or
>> Mon, 2014 April 28 21:00 EDT (9pm)
>>
>> The initial email had the wrong date (28 instead of 29).
>>
>> --
>> Christopher L Tubbs II
>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > Accumulo Developers,
>> >
>> > Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
>> >
>> > Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
>> > Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
>> >
>> > Staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
>> > Source:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
>> > Binary:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
>> > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
>> > given artifact.)
>> >
>> > All artifacts were built and staged with:
>> > mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
>> >
>> > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>> >
>> > Release notes (in progress):
>> http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
>> >
>> > Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
>> >
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
>> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
>> >
>> > This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
>> > April 28 01:00 UTC.
>> > (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
>> >
>> > [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
>> > [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
>> > [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
>> > ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
>> >
>> > Thanks.
>> >
>> > P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
>> > wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
>> > # note the trailing slash is needed
>> >
>> > --
>> > Christopher L Tubbs II
>> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by William Slacum <wi...@accumulo.net>.
Do you think doing this on a Friday was a good idea? I know that point came
up earlier, and it was possibly due to already discovered issues that would
fail the release, but I think the lack of traffic on here is significant.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:37 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> Correction on the vote end date. It's:
> Tue, 2014 April 29 01:00 UTC ... or
> Mon, 2014 April 28 21:00 EDT (9pm)
>
> The initial email had the wrong date (28 instead of 29).
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Accumulo Developers,
> >
> > Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
> >
> > Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
> > Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
> >
> > Staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
> > Source:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
> > Binary:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
> > (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> > given artifact.)
> >
> > All artifacts were built and staged with:
> > mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
> >
> > Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
> >
> > Release notes (in progress):
> http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
> >
> > Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
> >
> > This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
> > April 28 01:00 UTC.
> > (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
> >
> > [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> > [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
> > [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> > ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> > wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
> > # note the trailing slash is needed
> >
> > --
> > Christopher L Tubbs II
> > http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
>
Re: [VOTE] Accumulo 1.6.0-RC4
Posted by Christopher <ct...@apache.org>.
Correction on the vote end date. It's:
Tue, 2014 April 29 01:00 UTC ... or
Mon, 2014 April 28 21:00 EDT (9pm)
The initial email had the wrong date (28 instead of 29).
--
Christopher L Tubbs II
http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Christopher <ct...@apache.org> wrote:
> Accumulo Developers,
>
> Please consider the following candidate for Accumulo 1.6.0.
>
> Git Commit: 95ddea99e120102ce3316efbbe4948b574e59bc3
> Branch: 1.6.0-RC4
>
> Staging repo: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010
> Source: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-src.tar.gz
> Binary: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/org/apache/accumulo/accumulo/1.6.0/accumulo-1.6.0-bin.tar.gz
> (Append ".sha1", ".md5" or ".asc" to download the signature/hash for a
> given artifact.)
>
> All artifacts were built and staged with:
> mvn release:prepare && mvn release:perform
>
> Signing keys available at: https://www.apache.org/dist/accumulo/KEYS
>
> Release notes (in progress): http://accumulo.apache.org/release_notes/1.6.0
>
> Changes since RC3 (`git log 5678e51..origin/1.6.0-RC4`):
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-1219
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2523
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2569
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2654
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2707
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2713
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2714
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2715
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2716
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2717
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2718
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2720
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2723
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2726
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2728
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2729
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2733
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ACCUMULO-2734
>
> This vote will remain open for 72 hours (3 days), until Tue, 2014
> April 28 01:00 UTC.
> (That's 9pm EDT on Monday.)
>
> [ ] +1 - I have verified and accept...
> [ ] +0 - I have reservations, but not strong enough to vote against...
> [ ] -1 - Because..., I do not accept...
> ... these artifacts as the 1.6.0 release of Apache Accumulo.
>
> Thanks.
>
> P.S. Hint: download the whole staging repo with
> wget -erobots=off -r -l inf -np -nH
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheaccumulo-1010/
> # note the trailing slash is needed
>
> --
> Christopher L Tubbs II
> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii