You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Joshua McKenzie (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/09/22 20:48:05 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (CASSANDRA-9642) getSplits should not depend on selectAndReference()

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9642?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Joshua McKenzie updated CASSANDRA-9642:
---------------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 3.0.0 rc2)
                   3.0.x
                   2.2.x
                   2.1.x

> getSplits should not depend on selectAndReference()
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-9642
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-9642
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Core
>            Reporter: Benedict
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.1.x, 2.2.x, 3.0.x
>
>
> It turns out this method that nobody thinks too much about is on the critical path for some pretty important functionality. It uses {{keySamples}} and (repeatedly) {{estimatedKeysForRange}}, both of which take references to all intersecting sstables.
> Both could quite easily and safely be switched to guarding by the {{OpOrder readOrdering}}, which is both less burden and guarantees the operation cannot be blocked by issues like CASSANDRA-9637.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)