You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to log4j-dev@logging.apache.org by Mark Womack <mw...@apache.org> on 2005/08/24 07:20:00 UTC
[VOTE] Release 1.2.12rc6 as official log4j 1.2.12 release
Please evaluate the 1.2.12rc6 release. I am +1 for making it the official
1.2.12 release.
-Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release 1.2.12rc6 as official log4j 1.2.12 release
Posted by Mark Womack <mw...@apache.org>.
Just to officially close this, the 1.2.12rc6 version was accepted as the
official 1.2.12 release with 3 positive votes, 0 negative votes, and 1
abstention.
Files were updated with the release date of the build, the cvs was tagged
with v1_2_12, and an official build was created. The vote now goes to the
LS PMC for official approval for release.
-Mark
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Womack" <mw...@apache.org>
To: "Log4J Developers List" <lo...@logging.apache.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 23, 2005 10:20 PM
Subject: [VOTE] Release 1.2.12rc6 as official log4j 1.2.12 release
> Please evaluate the 1.2.12rc6 release. I am +1 for making it the official
> 1.2.12 release.
>
> -Mark
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release 1.2.12rc6 as official log4j 1.2.12 release
Posted by Mark Womack <wo...@adobe.com>.
Elias,
They are on the boat for the 1.3 task list. I haven't spent time putting
together a task list to review for 1.3, but after the 1.2.12 release and the
svn migration, 1.3 will be the immediate focus. We'll get organized around
it then.
-Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Elias Ross [mailto:eross@m-qube.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 26, 2005 10:07 AM
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.2.12rc6 as official log4j 1.2.12 release
>
> On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 23:27 -0500, Curt Arnold wrote:
> > +1
> >
>
> +1
>
> Incidentally, I do want to see my concurrent patches in 1.3 sometime.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.2.12rc6 as official log4j 1.2.12 release
Posted by Elias Ross <er...@m-qube.com>.
On Thu, 2005-08-25 at 23:27 -0500, Curt Arnold wrote:
> +1
>
+1
Incidentally, I do want to see my concurrent patches in 1.3 sometime.
Thanks.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
RE: [VOTE] Release 1.2.12rc6 as official log4j 1.2.12 release
Posted by Mark Womack <wo...@adobe.com>.
Yeah!
We need one more committer to vote positive to go ahead with the PMC release
vote and, if approved, actual release.
Thanks,
-Mark
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curt Arnold [mailto:carnold@apache.org]
> Sent: Thursday, August 25, 2005 9:27 PM
> To: Log4J Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release 1.2.12rc6 as official log4j 1.2.12 release
>
> +1
>
> My last set of modifications to the unit tests did not appear to take
> the first time even though commit messages hit the list. I retried
> and it appears to have taken this time and used the same revision
> numbers. The modifications have no effect on the distribution.
>
> Checked the tarball and zip for consistency.
>
> Unit tests run with no failures on the following platforms:
>
> Mac OS/X + Java 1.4.2_50 (had to specify -Djavac.source=1.3 as 1.1
> was not recognized)
> Windows 2000 + JDK 1.1.8, JDK 1.2.2, JDK 1.3.1_15, JDK 1.4.2_09, JDK
> 1.5.0_04
> SuSE 9.3 x86_64 + Java 1.4.2_08
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.2.12rc6 as official log4j 1.2.12 release
Posted by Curt Arnold <ca...@apache.org>.
+1
My last set of modifications to the unit tests did not appear to take
the first time even though commit messages hit the list. I retried
and it appears to have taken this time and used the same revision
numbers. The modifications have no effect on the distribution.
Checked the tarball and zip for consistency.
Unit tests run with no failures on the following platforms:
Mac OS/X + Java 1.4.2_50 (had to specify -Djavac.source=1.3 as 1.1
was not recognized)
Windows 2000 + JDK 1.1.8, JDK 1.2.2, JDK 1.3.1_15, JDK 1.4.2_09, JDK
1.5.0_04
SuSE 9.3 x86_64 + Java 1.4.2_08
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Release 1.2.12rc6 as official log4j 1.2.12 release
Posted by Paul Smith <ps...@aconex.com>.
Hi Mark and Curt,
I can only give a +0 as I have zero time to evaluate the release, but
from everything I've read, you guys have done a remarkable job, so I
applaud your efforts and stand behind you (putting aside the fact
that i still think < JDK 1.3 is not worth the effort, but everyone
calls me the upgrade-a-tron here at work, so that's no surprise really).
Incidently the reason I have no time is that I'm going on a (much
needed) O/S holiday friday week for 4w, so I'll be out of touch for a
while, and I'm busily trying to tie up loose ends here at work.
Thanks again for all the work you guys have put into the release stuff.
Paul
On 24/08/2005, at 3:20 PM, Mark Womack wrote:
> Please evaluate the 1.2.12rc6 release. I am +1 for making it the
> official 1.2.12 release.
>
> -Mark
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscribe@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-help@logging.apache.org