You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by ga...@apache.org on 2008/04/24 10:55:57 UTC
[BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 651174
Geronimo Revision: 651174 built with tests included
See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080424/build-0300.log
Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080424
[INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
[INFO] Total time: 32 minutes 43 seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Thu Apr 24 03:40:55 EDT 2008
[INFO] Final Memory: 337M/672M
[INFO] ------------------------------------------------------------------------
TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only)
=================================
See detailed results at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html
Assembly: tomcat
=================================
See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080424/logs-0300-tomcat/test.log
Assembly: jetty
=================================
See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080424/logs-0300-jetty/test.log
[INFO] Running TestSuite
[INFO] Tests run: 13, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 79.962 sec <<< FAILURE!
Samples: trunk
=================================
Log: http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080424/samples-0300.log
Build status: OK
Re: [BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 651174
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> It appears to be unrelated to SLF4J changes, but I'm not sure... anyone
> know better why these tests are failing?
It is because of my recent changes in openejb after which I published
them to the m2 repo. I made sure in some classes that input params
were not null. I will fix the Geronimo tests tonight. Thanks for your
patience.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Re: [BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 651174
Posted by Jacek Laskowski <ja...@laskowski.net.pl>.
On Sat, Apr 26, 2008 at 7:43 AM, Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com> wrote:
> Did something in openejb change recently? These tests were all passing
> while I was testing my SLF4J changes with `mvn -o` and then I did an online
> built and now they are failing because of:
Fixed as of revision 651851.
Jacek
--
Jacek Laskowski
http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl
Re: [BUILD] trunk: Failed for Revision: 651174
Posted by Jason Dillon <ja...@planet57.com>.
Did something in openejb change recently? These tests were all
passing while I was testing my SLF4J changes with `mvn -o` and then I
did an online built and now they are failing because of:
<snip>
java.lang.NullPointerException: context or beanClass input parameter
is null
at
org
.apache.openejb.core.CoreDeploymentInfo.<init>(CoreDeploymentInfo.java:
182)
at
org
.apache
.geronimo
.openejb.cluster.stateful.container.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest
$1.<init>(ClusteredStatefulContainerTest.java:107)
at
org
.apache
.geronimo
.openejb
.cluster
.stateful
.container
.ClusteredStatefulContainerTest
.setUp(ClusteredStatefulContainerTest.java:95)
at com.agical.rmock.extension.junit.BasicJUnitStrategyTestCase
$1.run(BasicJUnitStrategyTestCase.java:32)
at
com
.agical.rmock.core.strategy.impl.CompositeStep.run(CompositeStep.java:
24)
at
com.agical.rmock.core.strategy.impl.FinallyStep.run(FinallyStep.java:19)
at com.agical.rmock.core.expectation.Engine.runStrategy(Engine.java:
142)
...
</snip>
and
<snip>
java.lang.IllegalStateException: No existing context
at org.apache.openejb.core.ThreadContext.exit(ThreadContext.java:65)
at
org
.apache
.geronimo
.openejb
.cluster
.stateful
.container
.ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest
.tearDown(ClusteredStatefulInstanceManagerTest.java:102)
at com.agical.rmock.extension.junit.BasicJUnitStrategyTestCase
$2.run(BasicJUnitStrategyTestCase.java:61)
at
com.agical.rmock.core.strategy.impl.FinallyStep.run(FinallyStep.java:23)
at com.agical.rmock.core.expectation.Engine.runStrategy(Engine.java:
142)
</snip>
It appears to be unrelated to SLF4J changes, but I'm not sure...
anyone know better why these tests are failing?
--jason
On Apr 24, 2008, at 3:55 PM, gawor@apache.org wrote:
> Geronimo Revision: 651174 built with tests included
>
> See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080424/build-0300.log
>
> Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080424
> [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> [INFO] Total time: 32 minutes 43 seconds
> [INFO] Finished at: Thu Apr 24 03:40:55 EDT 2008
> [INFO] Final Memory: 337M/672M
> [INFO]
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> TESTSUITE RESULTS (Failures only)
> =================================
> See detailed results at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/testsuite/ResultsSummary.html
>
> Assembly: tomcat
> =================================
> See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080424/logs-0300-tomcat/test.log
>
>
> Assembly: jetty
> =================================
> See the full test.log file at http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080424/logs-0300-jetty/test.log
>
> [INFO] Running TestSuite
> [INFO] Tests run: 13, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time
> elapsed: 79.962 sec <<< FAILURE!
>
> Samples: trunk
> =================================
> Log: http://people.apache.org/builds/geronimo/server/binaries/trunk/20080424/samples-0300.log
>
> Build status: OK
>