You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@clerezza.apache.org by Tsuyoshi Ito <ts...@trialox.org> on 2009/12/11 16:10:27 UTC
Continuous Integration
Hi there
Have we made a decision about the continuous integration
infratstructure? Should we use hudson or continuum? We have used
continuum so far but I have no problem with hudson.
Cheers
Tsuy
Re: Continuous Integration
Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <re...@trialox.org>.
so could a mentor or the champion post an issue to get hudson?
cheers
reto
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 5:26 PM, Hasan <ha...@apache.org> wrote:
> I wouldn't mind using hudson
>
> Hasan
>
>
> Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
>> <re...@trialox.org> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> It's a while since I've last been using hudson, I remember it having some
>>> features that I was missing in continuum. The only problem I had was the
>>> rich webinterface occasionally crashing firefox, but I suppose that's
>>> fixed
>>> by now so I'm fine with hudson....
>>>
>>>
>>
>> I haven't had any issues with Hudson and Firefox since starting to use
>> it back in April.
>>
>> -Bertrand
>>
>>
>
Re: Continuous Integration
Posted by Hasan <ha...@apache.org>.
I wouldn't mind using hudson
Hasan
Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
> <re...@trialox.org> wrote:
>
>> It's a while since I've last been using hudson, I remember it having some
>> features that I was missing in continuum. The only problem I had was the
>> rich webinterface occasionally crashing firefox, but I suppose that's fixed
>> by now so I'm fine with hudson....
>>
>
> I haven't had any issues with Hudson and Firefox since starting to use
> it back in April.
>
> -Bertrand
>
Re: Continuous Integration
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Reto Bachmann-Gmuer
<re...@trialox.org> wrote:
> It's a while since I've last been using hudson, I remember it having some
> features that I was missing in continuum. The only problem I had was the
> rich webinterface occasionally crashing firefox, but I suppose that's fixed
> by now so I'm fine with hudson....
I haven't had any issues with Hudson and Firefox since starting to use
it back in April.
-Bertrand
Re: Continuous Integration
Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <re...@trialox.org>.
It's a while since I've last been using hudson, I remember it having some
features that I was missing in continuum. The only problem I had was the
rich webinterface occasionally crashing firefox, but I suppose that's fixed
by now so I'm fine with hudson.
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:14 PM, Tommaso Teofili
<to...@gmail.com>wrote:
> my personal preference for continuous integration is for Hudson, but no
> problem on using Continuum.
> Tommaso
>
> 2009/12/11 Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Tsuyoshi Ito <ts...@trialox.org>
> > wrote:
> > > ...Have we made a decision about the continuous integration
> > infratstructure?
> > > Should we use hudson or continuum? We have used continuum so far but I
> > have
> > > no problem with hudson....
> >
> > In Sling we are using hudson because at the time we decided, the
> > Apache continuum server was often overloaded and slow. I don't know if
> > that's still the case.
> >
> > -Bertrand
> >
>
Re: Continuous Integration
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
my personal preference for continuous integration is for Hudson, but no
problem on using Continuum.
Tommaso
2009/12/11 Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Tsuyoshi Ito <ts...@trialox.org>
> wrote:
> > ...Have we made a decision about the continuous integration
> infratstructure?
> > Should we use hudson or continuum? We have used continuum so far but I
> have
> > no problem with hudson....
>
> In Sling we are using hudson because at the time we decided, the
> Apache continuum server was often overloaded and slow. I don't know if
> that's still the case.
>
> -Bertrand
>
Re: Continuous Integration
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Tsuyoshi Ito <ts...@trialox.org> wrote:
> ...Have we made a decision about the continuous integration infratstructure?
> Should we use hudson or continuum? We have used continuum so far but I have
> no problem with hudson....
In Sling we are using hudson because at the time we decided, the
Apache continuum server was often overloaded and slow. I don't know if
that's still the case.
-Bertrand