You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Michael McCandless (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2013/10/08 14:00:45 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (LUCENE-5263) Deletes may be silently lost if an
IOException is hit and later not hit (e.g., disk fills up and then frees
up)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5263?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-5263:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Deletes may be silently lost if an IOException is hit and later not hit (e.g., disk fills up and then frees up) (was: Deletes may be silently lost if disk fills up and then frees up)
> Deletes may be silently lost if an IOException is hit and later not hit (e.g., disk fills up and then frees up)
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-5263
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-5263
> Project: Lucene - Core
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: core/index
> Reporter: Michael McCandless
> Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Fix For: 5.0, 4.6
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-5263.patch, LUCENE-5263.patch
>
>
> This case is tricky to handle, yet I think realistic: disk fills up
> temporarily, causes an exception in writeLiveDocs, and then the app
> keeps using the IW instance.
> Meanwhile disk later frees up again, IW is closed "successfully". In
> certain cases, we can silently lose deletes in this case.
> I had already committed
> TestIndexWriterDeletes.testNoLostDeletesOnDiskFull, and Jenkins seems
> happy with it so far, but when I added fangs to the test (cutover to
> RandomIndexWriter from IndexWriter, allow IOE during getReader, add
> randomness to when exc is thrown, etc.), it uncovered some real/nasty
> bugs:
> * ReaderPool.dropAll was suppressing any exception it hit, because
> {code}if (priorE != null){code} should instead be {code}if (priorE == null){code}
> * After a merge, we have to write deletes before committing the
> segment, because an exception when writing deletes means we need
> to abort the merge
> * Several places that were directly calling deleter.checkpoint must
> also increment the changeCount else on close IW thinks there are
> no changes and doesn't write a new segments file.
> * closeInternal was dropping pooled readers after writing the
> segments file, which would lose deletes still buffered due to a
> previous exc.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1#6144)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org