Site config and per user whitelist

[Lior Marantenboim <li...@bumeran.com>]

Hi everyone again

Right now I have a site wide configuration with a site wide whitelist. I
was wondering if, apart from this config, some users could have their
own config and use their own whitelists.

So those who don't have this config file will use the default one, and
those who do, use theirs.

Thanks

Lior

Re: [OT] Email Servers

[Ralf Hildebrandt <Ra...@charite.de>]

* Jeffrey Lee <je...@reflex8.com>:
> The email server I am using now has some unwelcomed price changes 
> happening soon and I would like to switch to another server. I would 
> like something that works well with SA and possibly ClamAV. The server 
> would require pop, imap, and webmail. If someone could suggest other 
> solutions please do.

We use postfix, amavisd-new with clamav, courier-imap (does pop too)
and SquirrelMail as webmail.

-- 
Ralf Hildebrandt (i.A. des IT-Zentrum)          Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de
Charite - Universitätsmedizin Berlin            Tel.  +49 (0)30-450 570-155
Gemeinsame Einrichtung von FU- und HU-Berlin    Fax.  +49 (0)30-450 570-962
IT-Zentrum Standort CBF                                   AIM.  ralfpostfix

Re: [OT] Email Servers

[Daniel Bird <db...@sghms.ac.uk>]

>On Thursday 21 October 2004 13:59, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
>  
>
>>The email server I am using now has some unwelcomed price changes
>>happening soon and I would like to switch to another server. I would
>>like something that works well with SA and possibly ClamAV. The server
>>would require pop, imap, and webmail. If someone could suggest other
>>solutions please do.
>>
>>    
>>
We use SunONE messaging server. SpamAssassin and Virus scanning 
(MailScanner) done at the edge on mailhubs running RHEL3 and exim. Works 
really well, although ClamAV and SA can be integrated into Messaging 
Server if wanted via the SMTP channels..

Dan

>>Thanks,
>>Jeffrey Lee
>>    
>>
>
>
>  
>


-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

Re: [OT] Email Servers

[Joe Croft <jo...@croftj.net>]

Communigate Pro from Stalker software has treated my real well over the last 3 
years.

-joe

On Thursday 21 October 2004 13:59, Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> The email server I am using now has some unwelcomed price changes
> happening soon and I would like to switch to another server. I would
> like something that works well with SA and possibly ClamAV. The server
> would require pop, imap, and webmail. If someone could suggest other
> solutions please do.
>
> Thanks,
> Jeffrey Lee

Re: [OT] Email Servers

[Rick Macdougall <ri...@nougen.com>]

Jeffrey Lee wrote:
> The email server I am using now has some unwelcomed price changes 
> happening soon and I would like to switch to another server. I would 
> like something that works well with SA and possibly ClamAV. The server 
> would require pop, imap, and webmail. If someone could suggest other 
> solutions please do.

Hi,

I use qmail/vpopmail on a variety of client servers.  Works great with 
SA and Clam plus it has the bonus of a mature virtual domain hosting web 
interface.

Supports all the usual imap, pop3, smtp, smtp auth etc etc.

Regards,

Rick

Re: [OT] Email Servers

[Sahil Tandon <sa...@hamla.org>]

Quoting Jeffrey Lee <je...@reflex8.com>:

> The email server I am using now has some unwelcomed price changes
> happening soon and I would like to switch to another server. I would
> like something that works well with SA and possibly ClamAV. The server
> would require pop, imap, and webmail. If someone could suggest other
> solutions please do.

On the MTA level, we use Postfix[1] in conjunction with amavisd-new[2] (which
hands off messages to ClamAV and SA).  For IMAP and POP, we use UW IMAP[3];
webmail is served via IMP[4].

Good luck.

--
Sahil Tandon

[1] http://www.postfix.org
[2] http://freshmeat.net/projects/amavisd-new/
[3] http://www.washington.edu/imap/
[4] http://www.horde.org/imp/

Re: [OT] Email Servers

[Mike Burger <mb...@bubbanfriends.org>]

On Thu, 21 Oct 2004, Jeffrey Lee wrote:

> The email server I am using now has some unwelcomed price changes 
> happening soon and I would like to switch to another server. I would 
> like something that works well with SA and possibly ClamAV. The server 
> would require pop, imap, and webmail. If someone could suggest other 
> solutions please do.

A linux box running Postfix, uw-imap/courier imap/whatever is coming with 
the Fedora distribution (I forget the package name, now), and Squirrelmail 
should suit your needs.  Clam-AV should work...personally, I'm using 
AmavisD with H+BEDV's AntiVir.

-- 
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org

Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.citadel.org or http://dogpound2.citadel.org

To be notified of updates to the web site, visit 
http://www.bubbanfriends.org/mailman/listinfo/site-update, or send a 
message to:

site-update-request@bubbanfriends.org

with a message of: 

subscribe

Re: [OT] Email Servers

[kaiser suse <ei...@mainphrame.com>]

FWIW, Suse linux pro 9.1 is a great starting point for me, as it ships
with postfix, spamassassin, amavisd, and clamav, and saslauth, and working
well together - I merely substituted dovecot as the imap/pop3 server,
updated spamassassin to 3.0 and added maia mailguard for quarantine
management. Maia is especially nice as it adds the missing piece.

The customers are quite happy with it.

Joe

Ron Johnson said:
> Jeffrey Lee writes:
>>
>> The email server I am using now has some unwelcomed price changes
>> happening soon and I would like to switch to another server. I would
>> like something that works well with SA and possibly ClamAV. The server
>> would require pop, imap, and webmail. If someone could suggest other
>> solutions please do.
>
> You might want to check out the Mimedefang How-To
>
> http://www.mickeyhill.com/mimedefang-howto/
>
> Not that there's anything magical about sendmail/mimedefang.
> Meets my needs nicely and with the How-To to follow is dead
> easy to set up. SA and ClamAV work very nicely and the MD
> mailing list is very helpful if you end up with problems.
>
> There's a commercial version of mimedefang (Canit) if that's
> the route you want to go. Anything that Canit does you can
> do yourself, but sometimes it's worth it to pay for the
> heavy lifting.
>
> The real answer is whatever UNIX flavor you're most
> comfortable with, the most convenient HW platform,
> the MTA you're happiest with. Pop, imap and webmail pretty
> much work independent of other issues.
>
>
>


-- 

RE: [OT] Email Servers

[kaiser suse <ei...@mainphrame.com>]

Andrew Ott said:
>
> Amavisd-new launches spamassasin in perl form rather then use spamd.

This is true, but amavisd does load the perl spamassassin code into memory
once at startup, so it's just as fast as spamd.


> The fedora core machines running amavisd-new are both 2.4 dual xeons with
> 4gb of memory
> Amavisd-new virus scanning and spam scanning with spamassasin is using
> about
> 18% cpu, and for everything we have about 1.8gb of memory in use, but that
> includes a virtual workspace for amavisd-new, which makes it much faster
> then doing it on disk.

Ah, excellent idea...

> We average a 1.12 load on the servers.  We are
> also
> using a raid 10 array of 4 ultra 320 scsi disks for faster write for the
> sendmail queues.

Check, that makes good sense.

> Andrew
>
>
>>> We are using 2 fedora core 2 machines running dual sendmail with
>>> amavisd-new, spamassassin 3.0, clamav, delivered to a database using
>>> dbmail, all with individual user preferences. For frontend machines.
>>> And 2 fedora core 2 machines running sendmail, dbmail-imapd and
>>> dbmail-pop3d, along with the horde web mail system for full webmail,
>>> calendar, address book, and task-list functions.
>
> email builder Wrote:
>>May I ask if you are running spamd?  How much CPU does SA consume?
>
>
>


-- 

RE: [OT] Email Servers

[Andrew Ott <ao...@actcom.net>]

Amavisd-new launches spamassasin in perl form rather then use spamd.

The fedora core machines running amavisd-new are both 2.4 dual xeons with
4gb of memory
Amavisd-new virus scanning and spam scanning with spamassasin is using about
18% cpu, and for everything we have about 1.8gb of memory in use, but that
includes a virtual workspace for amavisd-new, which makes it much faster
then doing it on disk.  We average a 1.12 load on the servers.  We are also
using a raid 10 array of 4 ultra 320 scsi disks for faster write for the
sendmail queues.

Andrew


>> We are using 2 fedora core 2 machines running dual sendmail with 
>> amavisd-new, spamassassin 3.0, clamav, delivered to a database using 
>> dbmail, all with individual user preferences. For frontend machines.  
>> And 2 fedora core 2 machines running sendmail, dbmail-imapd and 
>> dbmail-pop3d, along with the horde web mail system for full webmail, 
>> calendar, address book, and task-list functions.

email builder Wrote:
>May I ask if you are running spamd?  How much CPU does SA consume?

RE: [OT] Email Servers

[email builder <em...@yahoo.com>]

> We are using 2 fedora core 2 machines running dual sendmail with
> amavisd-new, spamassassin 3.0, clamav, delivered to a database using dbmail,
> all with individual user preferences. For frontend machines.  And 2 fedora
> core 2 machines running sendmail, dbmail-imapd and dbmail-pop3d, along with
> the horde web mail system for full webmail, calendar, address book, and
> task-list functions.

May I ask if you are running spamd?  How much CPU does SA consume?




		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoComplete - You start. We finish.
http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail 

RE: [OT] Email Servers

[Andrew Ott <ao...@actcom.net>]

We are using 2 fedora core 2 machines running dual sendmail with
amavisd-new, spamassassin 3.0, clamav, delivered to a database using dbmail,
all with individual user preferences. For frontend machines.  And 2 fedora
core 2 machines running sendmail, dbmail-imapd and dbmail-pop3d, along with
the horde web mail system for full webmail, calendar, address book, and
task-list functions.

The database runs on a redhat es3 machine running mysql 4 with innodb
databases.

Handles about 120,000 messages a day, with no problems.  And best of all
other then redhat es3 all of it is free software.

We will also probably install Maia Mailguard after the patch for the new
amavisd-new becomes available.  This will allow us to quarantine items and
allow each one of our users to view any quarantine items and have them
delivered to their inbox if they really want them.

Andrew Ott

-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Lee [mailto:jeff@reflex8.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 11:59 AM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: [OT] Email Servers

The email server I am using now has some unwelcomed price changes happening
soon and I would like to switch to another server. I would like something
that works well with SA and possibly ClamAV. The server would require pop,
imap, and webmail. If someone could suggest other solutions please do.

Thanks,
Jeffrey Lee

[OT] Email Servers

[Jeffrey Lee <je...@reflex8.com>]

The email server I am using now has some unwelcomed price changes 
happening soon and I would like to switch to another server. I would 
like something that works well with SA and possibly ClamAV. The server 
would require pop, imap, and webmail. If someone could suggest other 
solutions please do.

Thanks,
Jeffrey Lee

Re: Site config and per user whitelist

[Lior Marantenboim <li...@bumeran.com>]

>>From procmail, it calls spamc which connects to spamd.

Any other thing you need?

On Thu, 2004-10-21 at 12:28, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 11:57 AM 10/21/2004 -0300, Lior Marantenboim wrote:
> >Hi everyone again
> >
> >Right now I have a site wide configuration with a site wide whitelist. I
> >was wondering if, apart from this config, some users could have their
> >own config and use their own whitelists.
> 
> 
> Depends on how your site wide is set up. In particular, exactly where and 
> how does SA get called?  

Re: Site config and per user whitelist

[Matt Kettler <mk...@comcast.net>]

At 11:57 AM 10/21/2004 -0300, Lior Marantenboim wrote:
>Hi everyone again
>
>Right now I have a site wide configuration with a site wide whitelist. I
>was wondering if, apart from this config, some users could have their
>own config and use their own whitelists.


Depends on how your site wide is set up. In particular, exactly where and 
how does SA get called?