You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Henrique (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/09/04 14:57:00 UTC
[jira] [Comment Edited] (IGNITE-11974) infinite loop and 100% cpu
in GridDhtPartitionsEvictor: Eviction in progress ...
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11974?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17190762#comment-17190762 ]
Henrique edited comment on IGNITE-11974 at 9/4/20, 2:56 PM:
------------------------------------------------------------
Hi [~v.pyatkov], thanks for taking a look and confirming the issue.
Our main query, and the one I am using to reproduce the issue, is indeed a SqlFieldsQuery, but I have double checked and we are closing the cursor resource properly, it shouldn't be the cause of the issue.
We've now switched to using 2.7.6 in production and have not experienced any issues ever since.
If I have some time I'll try to set up a running example where you guys can use to reproduce on your side, and investigate.
Thanks for helping.
was (Author: arroyo):
Hi [~v.pyatkov], thanks for taking a look and confirming the issue.
Our main query, and the one I am using to reproduce the issue, is indeed a SqlFieldsQuery, but I have double checked and we are closing the cursor resource properly, it shouldn't be the cause of the issue.
We've now switched to using 2.7.6 in production and have not experienced any issues evet since.
If I have some time I'll try to set up a running example where you guys can use to reproduce on your side, and investigate.
Thanks for helping.
> infinite loop and 100% cpu in GridDhtPartitionsEvictor: Eviction in progress ...
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: IGNITE-11974
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-11974
> Project: Ignite
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: cache
> Affects Versions: 2.5
> Reporter: Igor Kamyshnikov
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: eviction-in-progress-dumps.zip, image-2019-07-10-16-07-37-185.png, server-node-restarts-1.png
>
>
> Note: RCA was not done:
> Sometimes ignite server nodes fall into infinite loop and consume 100% cpu:
> {noformat}
> "sys-#260008" #260285 prio=5 os_prio=0 tid=0x00007fabb020a800 nid=0x1e850 runnable [0x00007fab26fef000]
> java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
> at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap$Traverser.advance(ConcurrentHashMap.java:3339)
> at java.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap$ValueIterator.next(ConcurrentHashMap.java:3439)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtPartitionsEvictor$1.call(GridDhtPartitionsEvictor.java:84)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtPartitionsEvictor$1.call(GridDhtPartitionsEvictor.java:73)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.IgniteUtils.wrapThreadLoader(IgniteUtils.java:6695)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.closure.GridClosureProcessor$2.body(GridClosureProcessor.java:967)
> at org.apache.ignite.internal.util.worker.GridWorker.run(GridWorker.java:110)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1149)
> at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:624)
> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:748)
> Locked ownable synchronizers:
> - <0x0000000649b9cba0> (a java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker)
> {noformat}
> the following appears in logs each 2 minutes:
> {noformat}
> #### INFO 2019-07-08 12:21:45.081 (1562581305081) [sys-#98168] [GridDhtPartitionsEvictor] > Eviction in progress [grp=CUSTPRODINVOICEDISCUSAGE, remainingCnt=102]
> {noformat}
> remainingCnt remains the same once it reached 102 (the very first line in the logs was with value equal to 101).
> Some other facts:
> we have a heapdump taken for *topVer = 900* . the problem appeared after *topVer = 790*, but it looks like it was silently waiting from *topVer = 641* (about 24 hours back).
> There were 259 topology changes between 900 and 641.
> All 102 GridDhtLocalPartitions can be found in the heapdump:
> {noformat}
> select * from "org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtLocalPartition" t where delayedRenting = true
> {noformat}
> They all have status = 65537 , which means (according to org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtLocalPartition#state):
> reservations(65537) = 1
> getPartState(65537) = OWNING
> There are also 26968 instances of org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl$$Lambda$70, that are created by org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtPartitionTopologyImpl#checkEvictions method.
> 26418 of 26968 refer to AtomicInteger instance with value = 102:
> 26418/102 = 259 = 900 - 641 (see topology info above).
> The key thing seen from the heapdump is that topVer = 641 or topVer = 642 was the last topology where these 102 partitions were assigned to the current ignite server node.
> {noformat}
> select
> t.this
> ,t.this['clientEvtChange'] as clientEvtChange
> ,t.this['topVer.topVer'] as topVer
> ,t.this['assignment.elementData'][555]['elementData'][0]['hostNames.elementData'][0] as primary_part
> ,t.this['assignment.elementData'][555]['elementData'][1]['hostNames.elementData'][0] as secondary_part
> from org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.affinity.HistoryAffinityAssignment t where length(t.this['assignment.elementData']) = 1024
> order by topVer
> {noformat}
> !image-2019-07-10-16-07-37-185.png!
> The connection of a client node at topVer = 790 somehow triggered the GridDhtPartitionsEvictor loop to execute.
> Summary:
> 1) it is seen that 102 partitions has one reservation and OWNING state.
> 2) they were backup partitions.
> 3) for some reason their eviction has been silently delaying (because of reservations), but each topology change seemed to trigger eviction attempt.
> 4) something managed to make org.apache.ignite.internal.processors.cache.distributed.dht.GridDhtPartitionsEvictor#evictPartitionAsync to run never exiting.
> Additional info:
> topVer = 641 was in chain of sever nodes restarts (not sure if rebalancing actually succeeded):
> !server-node-restarts-1.png!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)