You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@beam.apache.org by "Kenneth Knowles (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/07/11 17:46:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (BEAM-115) Beam Runner API

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-115?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Kenneth Knowles resolved BEAM-115.
----------------------------------
       Resolution: Resolved
    Fix Version/s: Not applicable

I think this umbrella ticket is no longer adding value. The Runner API is a subproject with lots of threads.

> Beam Runner API
> ---------------
>
>                 Key: BEAM-115
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEAM-115
>             Project: Beam
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: beam-model-runner-api
>            Reporter: Kenneth Knowles
>            Assignee: Kenneth Knowles
>             Fix For: Not applicable
>
>
> The PipelineRunner API from the SDK is not ideal for the Beam technical vision.
> It has technical limitations:
>  - The user's DAG (even including library expansions) is never explicitly represented, so it cannot be analyzed except incrementally, and cannot necessarily be reconstructed (for example, to display it!).
>  - The flattened DAG of just primitive transforms isn't well-suited for display or transform override.
>  - The TransformHierarchy isn't well-suited for optimizations.
>  - The user must realistically pre-commit to a runner, and its configuration (batch vs streaming) prior to graph construction, since the runner will be modifying the graph as it is built.
>  - It is fairly language- and SDK-specific.
> It has usability issues (these are not from intuition, but derived from actual cases of failure to use according to the design)
>  - The interleaving of apply() methods in PTransform/Pipeline/PipelineRunner is confusing.
>  - The TransformHierarchy, accessible only via visitor traversals, is cumbersome.
>  - The staging of construction-time vs run-time is not always obvious.
> These are just examples. This ticket tracks designing, coming to consensus, and building an API that more simply and directly supports the technical vision.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)