You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@deltaspike.apache.org by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com> on 2013/06/17 02:42:11 UTC
[VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name
All
Based on the thread thus far, I'd like to call a vote. These are the two
names the seem to have the least angst:
beanval
bean-validation
So, to vote please respond with a +1 or a -1. +1 is for "beanval" but -1
is for "bean-validation"
I'm not including bv due to the US English connotations. I'm not including
bval due to the existing apache project plus references to other names I
saw in a quick google search.
- John
Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
-1
Le 17 juin 2013 02:49, "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> This way we can just sum up the total.
> On Jun 16, 2013 8:46 PM, "Jason Porter" <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > This a little odd way of doing a vote, but whatever :)
> >
> >
> > -1 I prefer bean-validation, it aligns exactly with the name.
> >
> > —
> > Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:43 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > [+1] beanval
> > > BTW, I'll leave this open for about 72 hours.
> > > John
> > > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:42 PM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com
> > >wrote:
> > >> All
> > >>
> > >> Based on the thread thus far, I'd like to call a vote. These are the
> > two
> > >> names the seem to have the least angst:
> > >>
> > >> beanval
> > >> bean-validation
> > >>
> > >> So, to vote please respond with a +1 or a -1. +1 is for "beanval" but
> > -1
> > >> is for "bean-validation"
> > >>
> > >> I'm not including bv due to the US English connotations. I'm not
> > >> including bval due to the existing apache project plus references to
> > other
> > >> names I saw in a quick google search.
> > >>
> > >> - John
> > >>
>
Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.
This way we can just sum up the total.
On Jun 16, 2013 8:46 PM, "Jason Porter" <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This a little odd way of doing a vote, but whatever :)
>
>
> -1 I prefer bean-validation, it aligns exactly with the name.
>
> —
> Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:43 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > [+1] beanval
> > BTW, I'll leave this open for about 72 hours.
> > John
> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:42 PM, John D. Ament <john.d.ament@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >> All
> >>
> >> Based on the thread thus far, I'd like to call a vote. These are the
> two
> >> names the seem to have the least angst:
> >>
> >> beanval
> >> bean-validation
> >>
> >> So, to vote please respond with a +1 or a -1. +1 is for "beanval" but
> -1
> >> is for "bean-validation"
> >>
> >> I'm not including bv due to the US English connotations. I'm not
> >> including bval due to the existing apache project plus references to
> other
> >> names I saw in a quick google search.
> >>
> >> - John
> >>
Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name
Posted by Jason Porter <li...@gmail.com>.
This a little odd way of doing a vote, but whatever :)
-1 I prefer bean-validation, it aligns exactly with the name.
—
Sent from Mailbox for iPhone
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 6:43 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> [+1] beanval
> BTW, I'll leave this open for about 72 hours.
> John
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:42 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>wrote:
>> All
>>
>> Based on the thread thus far, I'd like to call a vote. These are the two
>> names the seem to have the least angst:
>>
>> beanval
>> bean-validation
>>
>> So, to vote please respond with a +1 or a -1. +1 is for "beanval" but -1
>> is for "bean-validation"
>>
>> I'm not including bv due to the US English connotations. I'm not
>> including bval due to the existing apache project plus references to other
>> names I saw in a quick google search.
>>
>> - John
>>
Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <ge...@gmail.com>.
-1
"bv" was coined by the eg, is used in the spec. document and other areas
since years (and it fits to the abbreviations used for other spec. modules).
-> +1 for "bv"
regards,
gerhard
2013/6/17 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> gee, was too fast.
>
> Amending my vote to
>
> +0 (I'm fine with both)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> > To: "dev@deltaspike.apache.org" <de...@deltaspike.apache.org>
> > Cc:
> > Sent: Monday, 17 June 2013, 7:28
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name
> >
> > +1
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> >> From: John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
> >> To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
> >> Cc:
> >> Sent: Monday, 17 June 2013, 2:42
> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name
> >>
> >> [+1] beanval
> >>
> >> BTW, I'll leave this open for about 72 hours.
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:42 PM, John D. Ament
> >> <jo...@gmail.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> All
> >>>
> >>> Based on the thread thus far, I'd like to call a vote. These are
> > the
> >> two
> >>> names the seem to have the least angst:
> >>>
> >>> beanval
> >>> bean-validation
> >>>
> >>> So, to vote please respond with a +1 or a -1. +1 is for
> >> "beanval" but -1
> >>> is for "bean-validation"
> >>>
> >>> I'm not including bv due to the US English connotations. I'm
> > not
> >>> including bval due to the existing apache project plus references to
> > other
> >>> names I saw in a quick google search.
> >>>
> >>> - John
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
gee, was too fast.
Amending my vote to
+0 (I'm fine with both)
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> To: "dev@deltaspike.apache.org" <de...@deltaspike.apache.org>
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, 17 June 2013, 7:28
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name
>
> +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
>> To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
>> Cc:
>> Sent: Monday, 17 June 2013, 2:42
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name
>>
>> [+1] beanval
>>
>> BTW, I'll leave this open for about 72 hours.
>>
>> John
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:42 PM, John D. Ament
>> <jo...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> All
>>>
>>> Based on the thread thus far, I'd like to call a vote. These are
> the
>> two
>>> names the seem to have the least angst:
>>>
>>> beanval
>>> bean-validation
>>>
>>> So, to vote please respond with a +1 or a -1. +1 is for
>> "beanval" but -1
>>> is for "bean-validation"
>>>
>>> I'm not including bv due to the US English connotations. I'm
> not
>>> including bval due to the existing apache project plus references to
> other
>>> names I saw in a quick google search.
>>>
>>> - John
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
+1
LieGrue,
strub
----- Original Message -----
> From: John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>
> To: dev@deltaspike.apache.org
> Cc:
> Sent: Monday, 17 June 2013, 2:42
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name
>
> [+1] beanval
>
> BTW, I'll leave this open for about 72 hours.
>
> John
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:42 PM, John D. Ament
> <jo...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> All
>>
>> Based on the thread thus far, I'd like to call a vote. These are the
> two
>> names the seem to have the least angst:
>>
>> beanval
>> bean-validation
>>
>> So, to vote please respond with a +1 or a -1. +1 is for
> "beanval" but -1
>> is for "bean-validation"
>>
>> I'm not including bv due to the US English connotations. I'm not
>> including bval due to the existing apache project plus references to other
>> names I saw in a quick google search.
>>
>> - John
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.
[+1] beanval
BTW, I'll leave this open for about 72 hours.
John
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:42 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>wrote:
> All
>
> Based on the thread thus far, I'd like to call a vote. These are the two
> names the seem to have the least angst:
>
> beanval
> bean-validation
>
> So, to vote please respond with a +1 or a -1. +1 is for "beanval" but -1
> is for "bean-validation"
>
> I'm not including bv due to the US English connotations. I'm not
> including bval due to the existing apache project plus references to other
> names I saw in a quick google search.
>
> - John
>
Re: [VOTE] Bean Validation Module Name
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@gmail.com>.
Ok, so bean-validation is the winner.
I'll create JIRAs and complete the move a bit later.
John
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 8:42 PM, John D. Ament <jo...@gmail.com>wrote:
> All
>
> Based on the thread thus far, I'd like to call a vote. These are the two
> names the seem to have the least angst:
>
> beanval
> bean-validation
>
> So, to vote please respond with a +1 or a -1. +1 is for "beanval" but -1
> is for "bean-validation"
>
> I'm not including bv due to the US English connotations. I'm not
> including bval due to the existing apache project plus references to other
> names I saw in a quick google search.
>
> - John
>