You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> on 2014/08/15 19:49:17 UTC
xbean release next week?
Hi
I plan to release xbean next week (hopefully on wednesday but can be
the week end if I dont find time)
Main changes is: removing Async finder which was just crap (mea culpa)
and avoid AnnotationFinder to leak (ie only use classes from archive).
This last change can be very impacting for apps (if A extends B before
we tried to get B if B is not in the finder archive but now it is
skipped - it means archive needs to be correct now).
Why such a change? 1) consistency with its contract, 2) cause when you
scan you rarely want to "leak" on classloaders and more important: 3)
cause performance wise it is really impacting. For findImplementation
for instance it x3 the execution time.
But since it is impacting I'm tempted to do a 4.0.0.
Any -1?+1?
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
Re: xbean release next week?
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
+1
The move to 4.0 is perfectly fine for such a big change.
Are the changes already in trunk? Would like to test it with OWB before you do a release.
LieGrue,
strub
On Friday, 15 August 2014, 19:50, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Hi
>
>I plan to release xbean next week (hopefully on wednesday but can be
>the week end if I dont find time)
>
>Main changes is: removing Async finder which was just crap (mea culpa)
>and avoid AnnotationFinder to leak (ie only use classes from archive).
>
>This last change can be very impacting for apps (if A extends B before
>we tried to get B if B is not in the finder archive but now it is
>skipped - it means archive needs to be correct now).
>
>Why such a change? 1) consistency with its contract, 2) cause when you
>scan you rarely want to "leak" on classloaders and more important: 3)
>cause performance wise it is really impacting. For findImplementation
>for instance it x3 the execution time.
>
>But since it is impacting I'm tempted to do a 4.0.0.
>
>Any -1?+1?
>
>
>Romain Manni-Bucau
>Twitter: @rmannibucau
>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>
Re: xbean release next week?
Posted by Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>.
changes are on central ;) but work fine with tomee
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-08-28 9:25 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>:
> +1
>
> The move to 4.0 is perfectly fine for such a big change.
> Are the changes already in trunk? Would like to test it with OWB before you
> do a release.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> On Friday, 15 August 2014, 19:50, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Hi
>
> I plan to release xbean next week (hopefully on wednesday but can be
> the week end if I dont find time)
>
> Main changes is: removing Async finder which was just crap (mea culpa)
> and avoid AnnotationFinder to leak (ie only use classes from archive).
>
> This last change can be very impacting for apps (if A extends B before
> we tried to get B if B is not in the finder archive but now it is
> skipped - it means archive needs to be correct now).
>
> Why such a change? 1) consistency with its contract, 2) cause when you
> scan you rarely want to "leak" on classloaders and more important: 3)
> cause performance wise it is really impacting. For findImplementation
> for instance it x3 the execution time.
>
> But since it is impacting I'm tempted to do a 4.0.0.
>
> Any -1?+1?
>
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> Twitter: @rmannibucau
> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
Re: xbean release next week?
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
+1
The move to 4.0 is perfectly fine for such a big change.
Are the changes already in trunk? Would like to test it with OWB before you do a release.
LieGrue,
strub
On Friday, 15 August 2014, 19:50, Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>Hi
>
>I plan to release xbean next week (hopefully on wednesday but can be
>the week end if I dont find time)
>
>Main changes is: removing Async finder which was just crap (mea culpa)
>and avoid AnnotationFinder to leak (ie only use classes from archive).
>
>This last change can be very impacting for apps (if A extends B before
>we tried to get B if B is not in the finder archive but now it is
>skipped - it means archive needs to be correct now).
>
>Why such a change? 1) consistency with its contract, 2) cause when you
>scan you rarely want to "leak" on classloaders and more important: 3)
>cause performance wise it is really impacting. For findImplementation
>for instance it x3 the execution time.
>
>But since it is impacting I'm tempted to do a 4.0.0.
>
>Any -1?+1?
>
>
>Romain Manni-Bucau
>Twitter: @rmannibucau
>Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>
>
>