You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Aleksey Yeschenko (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/05/19 15:59:00 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (CASSANDRA-8163) Re-introduce DESCRIBE permission

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8163?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14550333#comment-14550333 ] 

Aleksey Yeschenko edited comment on CASSANDRA-8163 at 5/19/15 1:58 PM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

-Can we, for 2.2, just introduce the permission to the enum, and have it be a no-op?-

-I don't want us to break the API again in 3.0.-

Scratch that, we already have it in the enum, for roles. Sorry for the confusion.


was (Author: iamaleksey):
Can we, for 2.2, just introduce the permission to the enum, and have it be a no-op?

I don't want us to break the API again in 3.0.

> Re-introduce DESCRIBE permission
> --------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CASSANDRA-8163
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-8163
>             Project: Cassandra
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>            Reporter: Vishy Kasar
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 3.x
>
>
> We have a cluster like this:
> project1_keyspace
> table101
> table102
> project2_keyspace
> table201
> table202
> We have set up following users and grants:
> project1_user has all access to project1_keyspace 
> project2_user has all access to project2_keyspace
> However project1_user can still do a 'describe schema' and get the schema for project2_keyspace as well. We do not want project1_user to have any knowledge for project2 in any way (cqlsh/java-driver etc) .



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)