You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@trafficserver.apache.org by "Masakazu Kitajo (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2015/08/15 19:35:45 UTC

[jira] [Commented] (TS-3843) Strange framing should be handled as usual

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3843?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14698367#comment-14698367 ] 

Masakazu Kitajo commented on TS-3843:
-------------------------------------

{noformat}
SEND[1]: [Lenght: 0, Type: HEADERS(1), Flags: 0, StreamID: 1]
SEND[1]: [Lenght: 26, Type: CONTINUATION(9), Flags: 4, StreamID: 1]
 Flags: END_HEADERS
SEND[1]: [Lenght: 0, Type: DATA(0), Flags: 1, StreamID: 1]
 Flags: END_STREAM
RECV[0]: [Lenght: 8, Type: GOAWAY(7), Flags: 0, StreamID: 0]
 Last-Stream-ID: 1
 Error Code: PROTOCOL_ERROR
{noformat}

> Strange framing should be handled as usual
> ------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TS-3843
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TS-3843
>             Project: Traffic Server
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: HTTP/2
>            Reporter: Masakazu Kitajo
>
> To put all header fields into CONTINUATION frames is not prohibited, however, TS treat this framing as a protocol error.
> Though such a framing is inefficient and would not be used by ordinary clients, it should be handled in the same way as normal cases. Because it can be used for server fingerprinting.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)