You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2019/12/23 03:40:05 UTC

[GitHub] [spark] HeartSaVioR commented on issue #26981: [SPARK-26389][SS][FOLLOW-UP]Format config name to follow the other boolean conf naming convention

HeartSaVioR commented on issue #26981: [SPARK-26389][SS][FOLLOW-UP]Format config name to follow the other boolean conf naming convention
URL: https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/26981#issuecomment-568343316
 
 
   It would be great if we make clear about "Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?"; which versions are affected by such incompatible change. If official versions are contained we should also link both via AlternateConfig.
   
   I know that's only applied to 3.0.0 so I don't expect we want to use AlternateConfig to couple them, but given the description of PR describes "yes" on the statement, so better to be clear. (Given this is FOLLOW-UP of the feature which is not released officially, maybe "No" is OK as well.)

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org