You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@tapestry.apache.org by Walter <wa...@builditglobal.com> on 2004/08/16 23:01:11 UTC
Portlet Container
Can any recommend a portal container that they use with Tapestry?
Re: Portlet Container
Posted by Warner Onstine <sw...@warneronstine.com>.
I for one would be very interested, although I won't have any time to
devote until mid-Sept.
-warner
On Aug 17, 2004, at 1:00 PM, Adam Greene wrote:
> Walter wrote:
>
>> Can any recommend a portal container that they use with Tapestry?
>
> I have looked at making Pluto work with Tapestry, but haven't had time
> to do work on it. There are basically three parts to Pluto, two of
> the parts will work with only minor adjustments and they are the
> actual JSR-168 interfaces and the Portlet Container. It is the setup
> and config and control portion that needs to be translated (100+
> classes). The translation will take some time as we need to abstract
> away the Persistence layer and make the render portion Tapestry
> specific. Maybe we should look at putting together a team to work on
> it, rather than leaving poor Howard et al to do it :-) I will
> eventually do it myself for a project I'm working on, but the slated
> deliverable isn't until next year.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Portlet Container
Posted by Walter <wa...@builditglobal.com>.
Hi Adam,
Thank you for the comments. I hope to have a firm decision about our
development technology focus in the next two weeks and will commit
resources to that direction. If we decide to stay with Tapestry (as we
are finding not many developers have experience using it presently) we
will commit to "our requirement" to assist with bringing Tapestry (and
perhaps Pluto) JSR-168 compliant. Our requirement was also for WSRP
compliance and although I know that some believe these standards are
more marketing hype than standards, we have made a business decision to
implement both of them in our browser-based portal project. I'm
grateful for your mention Pluto because I did not know it existed as we
were introduced to a number of other open source portal projects
originally. The plan was to select a portal container, portal framework
and wsrp platform after we completed our Phase I release. Hopefully,
I've been promised it will be in the next two weeks but the work with
Slide has caused problems.
According to our written plan, "We will use the TapestryFramework to
organize a web based user interface. Further the page layout and
styling part of our application may be changed to the XSLT standard,
while using Tapestry for form handling and organizing pages." We have
done this and will report if we get this to work with Slide.
Walt.
Adam Greene wrote:
> Walter wrote:
>
>> Can any recommend a portal container that they use with Tapestry?
>
>
> I have looked at making Pluto work with Tapestry, but haven't had time
> to do work on it. There are basically three parts to Pluto, two of
> the parts will work with only minor adjustments and they are the
> actual JSR-168 interfaces and the Portlet Container. It is the setup
> and config and control portion that needs to be translated (100+
> classes). The translation will take some time as we need to abstract
> away the Persistence layer and make the render portion Tapestry
> specific. Maybe we should look at putting together a team to work on
> it, rather than leaving poor Howard et al to do it :-) I will
> eventually do it myself for a project I'm working on, but the slated
> deliverable isn't until next year.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org
>
>
Re: Portlet Container
Posted by Adam Greene <ag...@iq-2000.com>.
Walter wrote:
> Can any recommend a portal container that they use with Tapestry?
I have looked at making Pluto work with Tapestry, but haven't had time
to do work on it. There are basically three parts to Pluto, two of the
parts will work with only minor adjustments and they are the actual
JSR-168 interfaces and the Portlet Container. It is the setup and
config and control portion that needs to be translated (100+ classes).
The translation will take some time as we need to abstract away the
Persistence layer and make the render portion Tapestry specific. Maybe
we should look at putting together a team to work on it, rather than
leaving poor Howard et al to do it :-) I will eventually do it myself
for a project I'm working on, but the slated deliverable isn't until
next year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: tapestry-user-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: tapestry-user-help@jakarta.apache.org