You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tapestry.apache.org by Robert Zeigler <ro...@scazdl.org> on 2009/07/01 18:14:27 UTC
tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage)
Looking to apply the patch in this ticket; I can apply it to trunk,
but it looks like there's also a strong sentiment in favor of applying
the patch to the 5.1 release, as well (and, eventually, releasing
5.1.0.6). Any qualms with me making a 5.1.0.6 branch based on the
5.1.0.5 release?
Robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage)
Posted by Robert Zeigler <ro...@scazdl.org>.
*shrug* I named it 5.1.0.x-dev, with the idea that any ongoing
development of the 5.1.0 line will go there.
Robert
On Jul 3, 2009, at 7/38:31 AM , Massimo Lusetti wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Howard Lewis Ship<hl...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 on creating a new branch, towards an eventual .6 release
>
> If the only changes from .5 is the XML parser implementation, no
> functional changes no other bug fix or what else i would name it .5
> with and identifier... let's say .5-nowood
>
> Regards
> --
> Massimo
> http://meridio.blogspot.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage)
Posted by Massimo Lusetti <ml...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Howard Lewis Ship<hl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 on creating a new branch, towards an eventual .6 release
If the only changes from .5 is the XML parser implementation, no
functional changes no other bug fix or what else i would name it .5
with and identifier... let's say .5-nowood
Regards
--
Massimo
http://meridio.blogspot.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage)
Posted by "Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo" <th...@gmail.com>.
Em Wed, 01 Jul 2009 15:25:49 -0300, Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com>
escreveu:
> That's what I said. Seriously, did you copy mine, or do we come up with
> identical phrasing?
I just committed a copyright infringement. :) I copied your message.
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage)
Posted by Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:23 AM, Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo <
thiagohp@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 on creating a new branch, towards an eventual .6 release
>
That's what I said. Seriously, did you copy mine, or do we come up with
identical phrasing?
>
> --
> Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
> Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
> http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
Re: tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage)
Posted by "Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo" <th...@gmail.com>.
+1 on creating a new branch, towards an eventual .6 release
--
Thiago H. de Paula Figueiredo
Independent Java consultant, developer, and instructor
http://www.arsmachina.com.br/thiago
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
Re: tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage)
Posted by Howard Lewis Ship <hl...@gmail.com>.
+1 on creating a new branch, towards an eventual .6 release
On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Christian Gruber <
christianedwardgruber@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (not only non-binding, but with considerable conflict of interest, since
> I'm the one badgering Howard et. al. to have this happen ;)
>
>
>
> On Jul 1, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Robert Zeigler wrote:
>
> Looking to apply the patch in this ticket; I can apply it to trunk, but it
>> looks like there's also a strong sentiment in favor of applying the patch to
>> the 5.1 release, as well (and, eventually, releasing 5.1.0.6). Any qualms
>> with me making a 5.1.0.6 branch based on the 5.1.0.5 release?
>>
>> Robert
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>>
>>
> Christian Edward Gruber
> christianedwardgruber@gmail.com
> http://www.geekinasuit.com/
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
>
--
Howard M. Lewis Ship
Creator of Apache Tapestry
Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
Re: tap5-745 (remove woodstox-specific stax implementation usage)
Posted by Christian Gruber <ch...@gmail.com>.
+1 (not only non-binding, but with considerable conflict of interest,
since I'm the one badgering Howard et. al. to have this happen ;)
On Jul 1, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Robert Zeigler wrote:
> Looking to apply the patch in this ticket; I can apply it to trunk,
> but it looks like there's also a strong sentiment in favor of
> applying the patch to the 5.1 release, as well (and, eventually,
> releasing 5.1.0.6). Any qualms with me making a 5.1.0.6 branch
> based on the 5.1.0.5 release?
>
> Robert
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org
>
Christian Edward Gruber
christianedwardgruber@gmail.com
http://www.geekinasuit.com/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@tapestry.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@tapestry.apache.org