You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@thrift.apache.org by "David Reiss (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/01/19 20:24:54 UTC

[jira] Commented: (THRIFT-681) The HTML generator does not handle JavaDoc style comments very well

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-681?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12802424#action_12802424 ] 

David Reiss commented on THRIFT-681:
------------------------------------

See test/DocTest.thrift for the proper way of documenting parameters.  We don't have an example for exceptions, but they work the same way.

> The HTML generator does not handle JavaDoc style comments very well
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: THRIFT-681
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-681
>             Project: Thrift
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 0.2
>            Reporter: John Bartak
>
> If you create comments using the standard JavaDoc conventions of @param and @exception, the output that gets generated isn't the cleanest.  It would be better if the list of parameters and exceptions were placed in a table with the appropriate headers rather than just outputting the @param and @exception tags into the HTML output.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.